{"id":68726,"date":"2017-09-12T17:44:23","date_gmt":"2017-09-12T17:44:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/uncategorized\/2017\/09\/12\/va-secretary-defends-his-departments-medical-experiments-on-dogs\/"},"modified":"2026-08-08T13:40:36","modified_gmt":"2026-08-08T13:40:36","slug":"va-secretary-defends-his-departments-medical-experiments-on-dogs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/veterans\/2017\/09\/12\/va-secretary-defends-his-departments-medical-experiments-on-dogs\/","title":{"rendered":"VA secretary defends department’s medical experiments on dogs"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

WASHINGTON \u2014 Veterans Affairs Secretary David Shulkin defended his department\u2019s medical testing on dogs in an op-ed on Tuesday, arguing that proposed limits would significantly damage ongoing research designed to help ailing veterans.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the piece, published by USA Today<\/a>, Shulkin argues that VA canine testing programs \u201care some the safest and most humane in the world\u201d and are being unfairly characterized by critics. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cVA\u2019s canine research program represents a great example of why the department exists, as one of our current canine research studies illustrates,\u201d he wrote. \u201cThe study focuses on ways to prevent serious and potentially fatal lung infections that affect some veterans with spinal cord injuries because they are unable to cough effectively.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThe commercial demand for this type of study is almost non-existent \u2026 Shutting down VA\u2019s animal research programs would deny some of our most vulnerable veterans hope for new and potentially life-changing treatments.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The high-profile defense comes after months of attacks from critics of VA\u2019s use of medical testing on dogs, who say the tests are unnecessary and inhumane. In a US News & World Report editorial last month<\/a>, Reps. Dina Titus, D-Nev., and David Brat, R-Va., said VA\u2019s dog experiments \u201calmost amount to torture.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Justin Goodman, vice president for public policy at White Coat Waste, blasted Shulkin\u2019s op-ed as \u201ctreating this issue of bad policy as just a public relations problem.\u201d He said VA has not offered any solid evidence that the animal testing is producing new scientific breakthroughs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThey\u2019re defending people who make their paycheck torturing dogs,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

VA has fought back against accusations of irresponsible conduct in their research. Watchdog groups have accused the agency of incomplete records and violations of federal restrictions on canine experiments, but department leaders have insisted they follow all relevant regulations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In a statement last month, Dr. Michael Fallon, chief veterinary medical officer for VA, said dogs account for \u201cfewer than 0.05 percent\u201d used for medical tests in 2016. Canines are used \u201conly when studies of rodents cannot provide the information that is needed.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In July, House members passed an amendment to an omnibus spending measure that states VA funding for fiscal 2018 may not be used \u201cto purchase, breed, transport, house, feed, maintain, dispose of, or experiment on dogs\u201d as part of pain studies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Several veterans groups have publicly opposed the language, calling it too restrictive. Shulkin in his piece called for senators to reject the idea.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAmerica needs VA\u2019s innovative research programs, and veterans and their families have earned them,\u201d he wrote. \u201cWe owe it to these patriots to do all we can to develop medical advancements that could help restore some of what they have sacrificed in service to our nation.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Senate lawmakers are expected to discuss the provision in coming weeks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n