{"id":84069,"date":"2024-05-07T09:40:00","date_gmt":"2024-05-07T09:40:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/uncategorized\/2024\/05\/07\/one-defense-strategy-two-drastically-different-budgets\/"},"modified":"2026-08-08T01:07:03","modified_gmt":"2026-08-08T01:07:03","slug":"one-defense-strategy-two-drastically-different-budgets","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/news\/your-air-force\/2024\/05\/07\/one-defense-strategy-two-drastically-different-budgets\/","title":{"rendered":"One defense strategy, two drastically different budgets"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

This is the second story of a two-part series. The first story is <\/i>available here<\/i><\/a>.<\/i><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Call it a tale of two China strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The U.S. Air Force and Navy are each preparing for a potential fight<\/a> in the Pacific against China<\/a>, perhaps in the next couple of years, under the guidance of the same National Defense Strategy. But this uncertain timing overlaps uncomfortably with a mountain of modernization priorities for each service.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Add to that budget caps for fiscal 2024 and fiscal 2025, and the two services have responded with very different budget strategies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On one side, the Air Force\u2019s proposed FY25 budget<\/a> would trim its procurement account by $1.6 billion from the prior year, while boosting research, development, test and evaluation spending by nearly that amount. In the process, the service expects to reduce its fighter jet purchases by 12.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For its part, the Navy has found itself in a shooting war in the Red Sea while also trying to increase its presence in the Pacific region to deter China. The service has prioritized paying for current operations and personnel in its FY25 spending request. Procurement spending is flat, while research and development drops 5%.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

U.S. intelligence officials say Chinese President Xi Jinping has set a goal for the nation\u2019s military to modernize enough to carry out an invasion of Taiwan \u2014 which China views as a rogue breakaway province \u2014 as early as 2027.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Chinese President Xi Jinping is displayed on a screen as Type 99A2 battle tanks participate in a 2015 parade in Beijing. (Ng Han Guan\/AP)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The Air Force says that, while it wrestles with spending caps under the Fiscal Responsibility Act, it leaned toward research and development more than procurement to ensure future capabilities remain on track.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Navy, in contrast, contends that if it must deter or fight China in this \u201cdecade of concern,\u201d it would do so with the fleet it has today, not the one it hopes to develop in the decades to come.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As the services determine their approaches, lawmakers are weighing in on whether the United States will be ready to face China in time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rep. Rob Wittman, R-Va., said at a March conference China could try to take Taiwan by force as early as 2027, noting that fielding capabilities at the turn of the decade will be too late.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAnybody that uses a metric or time frame and says, \u2018We\u2019ll get this stuff done by 2030\u2032 \u2014 wrong answer,\u201d Wittman said at the McAleese & Associates event. \u201c2027 needs to be the metric. That\u2019s how we will have the opportunity to deter [China].\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A pattern of differing approaches<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

At least one expert told Defense News it\u2019s normal for the Navy and Air Force to take different approaches on modernization.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In general, the Navy has taken a more strategic, methodical route to accomplishing its aircraft modernization goals, holding back on buying next-generation aircraft until technology matures and prices come down, said Todd Harrison, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute think tank who focuses on defense budgets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the meantime, the Navy has bought aircraft already in production to fill out its inventory. For example, over the last decade, the service repeatedly extended its fourth-generation F\/A-18E\/F Super Hornet production line to avoid a fighter jet shortfall. It introduced its fifth-generation F-35C<\/a> in 2019, well after the Marine Corps\u2019 F-35B in 2015 and the Air Force\u2019s F-35A in 2016.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Sailors perform maintenance on an F\/A-18E Super Hornet from the hanger bay of the U.S. Navy aircraft carrier John C. Stennis. (MCSN Tomas Compian\/U.S. Defense Logistics Agency)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThat\u2019s why for about a decade, until just recently, the Navy had a higher aircraft procurement budget than the Air Force,\u201d Harrison said. \u201cThe Air Force approach has been more about chasing new technologies and shiny objects that are dangled in front of them.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Air Force is now simultaneously trying to buy the F-15EX, a new version of a legacy fighter, and the F-35A, while \u201cgetting knee-deep\u201d into developing a sixth-generation fighter program called Next Generation Air Dominance, or NGAD, Harrison said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThey\u2019re trying to buy three different generations of fighters all at the same time,\u201d he said. \u201cAnd it looks like they just aren\u2019t sure where they want to place their bets. That\u2019s an unsustainable approach, and it looks like it\u2019s catching up to them. They just don\u2019t have the resources to continue buying three different lines of three different generations of fighters all at once.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But if China moves to reclaim Taiwan in 2027, Harrison said, the Air Force is \u201cgoing to come up short. They\u2019re not going to have the future systems like NGAD in time, and they\u2019re not going to have the quantity of fifth-gen and fourth-gen fighters that they would likely need in those scenarios. \u2026 They\u2019re destined to fall short on quantities with this approach.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n

<\/atype-video-jwplayer>
The Pentagon released footage of a Chinese aircraft approaching a U.S. aircraft over the South China Sea.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n

The Navy, for its part, acknowledges it would enter a hypothetical 2027 battle with the fleet it has today. So even as its ship and aircraft fleet have shrunk in size in recent years amid the decommissioning of Cold War-era platforms, the service has focused on the readiness of the ships and planes it would take to war.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Navy has launched several data-driven efforts aimed at quickening maintenance, and it has looked to field software updates and other capabilities that can be rapidly implemented on existing platforms, rather than built into those of the future.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Navy Under Secretary Erik Raven told Defense News all the services are driven \u201cto be ready to execute the [National Defense Strategy] over the near, the medium and the longer term. Each service will come to that with a slightly different view on how to execute that strategy. But we\u2019re fundamentally all aligned to execute that strategy.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the Navy has sided with Wittman\u2019s push to be ready by 2027, Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall said at the McAleese conference<\/a> his service must take a longer view.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cIt\u2019s a risk balance over time,\u201d Kendall said. \u201cIf you fixate only on 2027, you\u2019re going to find that in \u201929 you\u2019re in big trouble.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2018We got pinched\u2019<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

Maj. Gen. Dave Tabor, director of programs for the Air Force\u2019s Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Plans and Programs, told Defense News the service must be able to field enough existing capabilities and continue developing the next generation of aircraft to stay on the cutting edge. To do that, he said, the service had to strike a fine balance between R&D and procurement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And with the Fiscal Responsibility Act\u2019s budgetary caps pushing the Air Force to make tough choices, R&D came out on top.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAt the end of the day, we got pinched by the topline,\u201d Tabor said, and six F-35s and six F-15EXs got cut. \u201cThe result is relatively minimal to our overall rollout, but it\u2019s 12 jets [cut] that last year we were thrilled to have.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The consequences of the FRA\u2019s budgetary caps started to come into focus last summer after the Air Force had drawn up its program objective memorandum, which spells out the service\u2019s spending plans over the next five years, Tabor said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cWe knew that [the FRA] was coming; we didn\u2019t know how it was going to manifest,\u201d he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Then-Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. CQ Brown speaks with airmen during a stop at Travis Air Force Base, Calif., on Aug. 4, 2022. (Senior Airman Alexander Merchak\/U.S. Air Force)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Top Air Force leaders, including then-Chief of Staff Gen. CQ Brown, current Chief of Staff Gen. David Allvin and Secretary Kendall, convened in June for a high-level meeting called Corona South. A key topic of discussion, Tabor said, was what to put on the chopping block to meet the budget caps. The matter remained unsettled as Corona South wrapped up, he added, and only became more clear after submitting the program objective memorandum at the end of June.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In hindsight, the Air Force would have liked a clearer picture of its budgetary outlook earlier, though service leaders ended up relatively satisfied with the result, Tabor said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cBuilding a 90% solution is a whole lot different than building a 100% solution and taking 10% out of it, and the latter is kind of what we ended up with,\u201d he said. \u201cThe approach was [preserving capabilities that provide] relative value to the joint fight and what did the least amount of damage to what we had already done.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If a conflict with China were to erupt, he added, systems now in the works \u2014 such as NGAD, the B-21 Raider stealth bomber and artificial intelligence-operated drones known as collaborative combat aircraft \u2014 would allow the Air Force to fight in ways it never had before.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

NGAD and the collaborative combat aircraft ended up winners in the Air Force\u2019s proposed R&D budget: The former\u2019s funding in 2025 would jump by $815 million to more than $2.7 billion, and CCA spending would increase by $165 million to $557 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Harrison and Heather Penney, a former F-16 pilot and senior resident fellow at the Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies, said the Air Force can\u2019t count on having newer capabilities, such as NGAD, fielded in the early 2030s. Such a time frame could be overly optimistic, they agreed, given the advanced technology that must be refined for NGAD and the track record of some nascent aircraft programs failing to stay on schedule.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
This concept art shows a concept for the U.S. Air Force’s future fighter, known as Next Generation Air Dominance. (Boeing)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

\u201cWhen was the last time we ever saw an advanced capability show up on time and on budget?\u201d Penney said. The B-21\u2032s apparent success so far is \u201can exception to how we\u2019ve seen everything else happen. The capabilities [intended for NGAD], in terms of fully operationally capable \u2014 that\u2019s not 2030. We\u2019re talking 2035, 2040.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tabor said NGAD is \u201cproceeding at pace\u201d and that, even if it falls behind schedule, \u201cwe\u2019re prepared with other capabilities to mitigate risk\u201d for a conflict with China.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2018Something has to give\u2019<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

For the Navy, prioritizing current operations over future platforms<\/a> wasn\u2019t a choice; it was an operational imperative.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Navy reported it has lobbed a billion dollars\u2019 worth of missiles into the skies of the Middle East since October, shooting down drones and missiles launched by the Yemen-based Houthi rebel group. The service hasn\u2019t publicly estimated the cost of its operations there, which include the higher-than-usual tempo of daily operations for ships and planes, the extension of the Gerald R. Ford Carrier Strike Group\u2019s deployment in the fall, and what\u2019s likely to be a greater maintenance bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cWhere the Department of the Navy really placed its priorities is on our fundamental mission of being forward-deployed around the world so that if a crisis hits, we\u2019re there on the scene,\u201d Raven, the undersecretary, told Defense News days after releasing the FY25 budget. \u201cReadiness and people were the two top priorities that really came through in this budget.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Navy asked for $87.6 billion for operations and maintenance, up $3 billion from FY24. It also continued a recent focus on munitions, asking for $6.6 billion to buy weapons and expand the industrial base that builds them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But it had to then cut procurement and R&D. The Navy asked for six ships, compared to the seven it previously expected to include in its FY25 budget. It also asked for 75 planes, compared to the 94 it previously planned to purchase.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Naval special warfare operators use a submarine exploration diver propulsion vehicle during underwater training in the waters near Virginia Beach, Va., on Jan. 7, 2024. (MC1 Trey Hutcheson\/U.S. Navy)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

This took a toll on all three of the Navy\u2019s key modernization programs<\/a>: its own Next Generation Air Dominance, which includes a manned and unmanned family of systems to replace the F\/A-18E\/F Super Hornet fleet; the SSN(X) next-generation attack submarine that will follow the Virginia class; and the DDG(X) next-generation destroyer that will follow the Arleigh Burke class.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Navy\u2019s NGAD effort took the biggest financial hit: The service wants $454 million in FY25, compared to $1.5 billion in FY24, for the F\/A-XX piloted aircraft portion of the program.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The SSN(X) program faces the most significant delay: The service now says it will begin acquisition in the early 2040s, compared to a previous 2035 start and a 2031 plan before that.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Raven said the Navy had to take risk here, given the FRA budget caps.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cIf we\u2019re going to prioritize people and readiness, something has to give, and we saw the best benefit in taking more risk in that longer-term modernization,\u201d he told Defense News. \u201cBut budget caps have consequences. There are hard choices being made in this year\u2019s budget.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Down the line, Raven added, \u201cthere may be opportunities to learn from the Air Force as it develops its path to some of these same types of technologies\u201d \u2014 such as their separate NGAD programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Though lawmakers like Wittman have expressed a preference for prioritizing readiness over future fleet size and capability, one expert warned the Navy is digging itself a hole it will struggle to get out of.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cGiven the long lead time to design and build capital assets such as ships and aircraft, the U.S. Navy has entered its version of a \u2018doom loop\u2019 where funds for future ships are deferred to pay for today\u2019s readiness \u2014 which ensures tomorrow\u2019s readiness will also suffer, as new ships are required to maintain readiness,\u201d Mackenzie Eaglen, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, told Defense News.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cReadiness and fleet size are inextricably linked,\u201d Eaglen added. \u201cIt\u2019s shortsighted to believe they are separate and distinct.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Air Force, after decades of deferred modernization, now faces a \u201cmassive gap\u201d between its current reality and the vision Kendall crafted for transforming the service through next-generation systems, Penney said. But it can\u2019t achieve that vision without pouring its money into research and development.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cNobody\u2019s wrong here, and nobody\u2019s right,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is the second story of a two-part series. The first story is <\/i>available here<\/i><\/a>.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Air Force wants to trim procurement funds, but boost research and development. The Navy wants money to cover ongoing operations at the expense of R&D.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":108294,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"single-post-featured-layout","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-noindex":"","_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-nofollow":"","_yoast_wpseo_canonical":"","_acf":"","_yoast_wpseo_primary_category":67,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","_smg_distribution_targets":[]},"categories":[101,16,26,67],"tags":[],"coauthors":[3320,3263],"class_list":["post-84069","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-daily-news-roundup","category-news","category-newsletters","category-your-air-force"],"acf":{"subheadline":"Why the US Air Force and Navy created contrasting spending plans to prepare for conflict with China","legacy_arc_id":"VDMAROVGQZFKPFZ6WPPLXQTTZ4","arc_canonical_url":"\/global\/the-americas\/2024\/05\/07\/one-defense-strategy-two-drastically-different-budgets\/","remove_feature_photo":false,"is_sponsored":false,"subtype":"featured-layout","redirect_url":"","disable_inline_ads":false,"native_logo_pretext":"Presented By:"},"yoast_head":"\nOne defense strategy, two drastically different budgets - Air Force TImes<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The Air Force wants to trim procurement funds, but boost research and development. The Navy wants money to cover ongoing operations at the expense of R&D.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"One defense strategy, two drastically different budgets\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Air Force wants to trim procurement funds, but boost research and development. The Navy wants money to cover ongoing operations at the expense of R&D.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/news\/your-air-force\/2024\/05\/07\/one-defense-strategy-two-drastically-different-budgets\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Air Force TImes\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2024-05-07T09:40:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-08-08T01:07:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Stephen Losey, Megan Eckstein\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Stephen Losey, Megan Eckstein\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"12 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\n\t \"@context\": \"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\n\t \"@graph\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"Article\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/airforcetimes\\\/news\\\/your-air-force\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/07\\\/one-defense-strategy-two-drastically-different-budgets\\\/#article\",\n\t \"isPartOf\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/airforcetimes\\\/news\\\/your-air-force\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/07\\\/one-defense-strategy-two-drastically-different-budgets\\\/\"\n\t },\n\t \"author\": {\n\t \"name\": \"migration\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/airforcetimes\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1\"\n\t },\n\t \"headline\": \"One defense strategy, two drastically different budgets\",\n\t \"datePublished\": \"2024-05-07T09:40:00+00:00\",\n\t \"dateModified\": \"2026-08-08T01:07:03+00:00\",\n\t \"mainEntityOfPage\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/airforcetimes\\\/news\\\/your-air-force\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/07\\\/one-defense-strategy-two-drastically-different-budgets\\\/\"\n\t },\n\t \"wordCount\": 2383,\n\t \"commentCount\": 0,\n\t \"publisher\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/airforcetimes\\\/#organization\"\n\t },\n\t \"image\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/airforcetimes\\\/news\\\/your-air-force\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/07\\\/one-defense-strategy-two-drastically-different-budgets\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t },\n\t \"thumbnailUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/8265997.jpg.jpg\",\n\t \"articleSection\": [\n\t \"Daily News Roundup\",\n\t \"News\",\n\t \"Newsletters\",\n\t \"Your Air Force\"\n\t ],\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t \"potentialAction\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"CommentAction\",\n\t \"name\": \"Comment\",\n\t \"target\": [\n\t \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/airforcetimes\\\/news\\\/your-air-force\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/07\\\/one-defense-strategy-two-drastically-different-budgets\\\/#respond\"\n\t ]\n\t }\n\t ]\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"WebPage\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/airforcetimes\\\/news\\\/your-air-force\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/07\\\/one-defense-strategy-two-drastically-different-budgets\\\/\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/airforcetimes\\\/news\\\/your-air-force\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/07\\\/one-defense-strategy-two-drastically-different-budgets\\\/\",\n\t \"name\": \"One defense strategy, two drastically different budgets - Air Force TImes\",\n\t \"isPartOf\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/airforcetimes\\\/#website\"\n\t },\n\t \"primaryImageOfPage\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/airforcetimes\\\/news\\\/your-air-force\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/07\\\/one-defense-strategy-two-drastically-different-budgets\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t },\n\t \"image\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/airforcetimes\\\/news\\\/your-air-force\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/07\\\/one-defense-strategy-two-drastically-different-budgets\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t },\n\t \"thumbnailUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/8265997.jpg.jpg\",\n\t \"datePublished\": \"2024-05-07T09:40:00+00:00\",\n\t \"dateModified\": \"2026-08-08T01:07:03+00:00\",\n\t \"description\": \"The Air Force wants to trim procurement funds, but boost research and development. The Navy wants money to cover ongoing operations at the expense of R&D.\",\n\t \"breadcrumb\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/airforcetimes\\\/news\\\/your-air-force\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/07\\\/one-defense-strategy-two-drastically-different-budgets\\\/#breadcrumb\"\n\t },\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t \"potentialAction\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ReadAction\",\n\t \"target\": [\n\t \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/airforcetimes\\\/news\\\/your-air-force\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/07\\\/one-defense-strategy-two-drastically-different-budgets\\\/\"\n\t ]\n\t }\n\t ]\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/airforcetimes\\\/news\\\/your-air-force\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/07\\\/one-defense-strategy-two-drastically-different-budgets\\\/#primaryimage\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/8265997.jpg.jpg\",\n\t \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/8265997.jpg.jpg\"\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"BreadcrumbList\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/airforcetimes\\\/news\\\/your-air-force\\\/2024\\\/05\\\/07\\\/one-defense-strategy-two-drastically-different-budgets\\\/#breadcrumb\",\n\t \"itemListElement\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t \"position\": 1,\n\t \"name\": \"Home\",\n\t \"item\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/airforcetimes\\\/\",\n\t \"ad_zone\": \"home\"\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t \"position\": 2,\n\t \"name\": \"Your Air Force\",\n\t \"item\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/airforcetimes\\\/news\\\/your-air-force\\\/\",\n\t \"ad_zone\": \"your-air-force\"\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t \"position\": 3,\n\t \"name\": \"One defense strategy, two drastically different budgets\"\n\t }\n\t ]\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"WebSite\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/airforcetimes\\\/#website\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/airforcetimes\\\/\",\n\t \"name\": \"Air Force TImes\",\n\t \"description\": \"Independent News For Airmen | Air Force Times\",\n\t \"publisher\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/airforcetimes\\\/#organization\"\n\t },\n\t \"potentialAction\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"SearchAction\",\n\t \"target\": {\n\t \"@type\": \"EntryPoint\",\n\t \"urlTemplate\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/airforcetimes\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"\n\t },\n\t \"query-input\": {\n\t \"@type\": \"PropertyValueSpecification\",\n\t \"valueRequired\": true,\n\t \"valueName\": \"search_term_string\"\n\t }\n\t }\n\t ],\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\"\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/airforcetimes\\\/#organization\",\n\t \"name\": \"Air Force TImes\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/airforcetimes\\\/\",\n\t \"logo\": {\n\t \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/airforcetimes\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/air-logo-white.png\",\n\t \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/air-logo-white.png\",\n\t \"caption\": \"Air Force TImes\"\n\t },\n\t \"image\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/airforcetimes\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"\n\t }\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"Person\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/airforcetimes\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1\",\n\t \"name\": \"migration\",\n\t \"image\": {\n\t \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=gcf4cb6ee0ec29e49e7a963234e4340ec\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\n\t \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\n\t \"caption\": \"migration\"\n\t },\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/airforcetimes\\\/author\\\/migration\\\/\"\n\t }\n\t ]\n\t}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"One defense strategy, two drastically different budgets - Air Force TImes","description":"The Air Force wants to trim procurement funds, but boost research and development. The Navy wants money to cover ongoing operations at the expense of R&D.","robots":{"index":"noindex","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"One defense strategy, two drastically different budgets","og_description":"The Air Force wants to trim procurement funds, but boost research and development. The Navy wants money to cover ongoing operations at the expense of R&D.","og_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/news\/your-air-force\/2024\/05\/07\/one-defense-strategy-two-drastically-different-budgets\/","og_site_name":"Air Force TImes","article_published_time":"2024-05-07T09:40:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-08-08T01:07:03+00:00","author":"Stephen Losey, Megan Eckstein","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Stephen Losey, Megan Eckstein","Est. reading time":"12 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/news\/your-air-force\/2024\/05\/07\/one-defense-strategy-two-drastically-different-budgets\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/news\/your-air-force\/2024\/05\/07\/one-defense-strategy-two-drastically-different-budgets\/"},"author":{"name":"migration","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/#\/schema\/person\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1"},"headline":"One defense strategy, two drastically different budgets","datePublished":"2024-05-07T09:40:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-08T01:07:03+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/news\/your-air-force\/2024\/05\/07\/one-defense-strategy-two-drastically-different-budgets\/"},"wordCount":2383,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/news\/your-air-force\/2024\/05\/07\/one-defense-strategy-two-drastically-different-budgets\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/8265997.jpg.jpg","articleSection":["Daily News Roundup","News","Newsletters","Your Air Force"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/news\/your-air-force\/2024\/05\/07\/one-defense-strategy-two-drastically-different-budgets\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/news\/your-air-force\/2024\/05\/07\/one-defense-strategy-two-drastically-different-budgets\/","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/news\/your-air-force\/2024\/05\/07\/one-defense-strategy-two-drastically-different-budgets\/","name":"One defense strategy, two drastically different budgets - Air Force TImes","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/news\/your-air-force\/2024\/05\/07\/one-defense-strategy-two-drastically-different-budgets\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/news\/your-air-force\/2024\/05\/07\/one-defense-strategy-two-drastically-different-budgets\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/8265997.jpg.jpg","datePublished":"2024-05-07T09:40:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-08T01:07:03+00:00","description":"The Air Force wants to trim procurement funds, but boost research and development. The Navy wants money to cover ongoing operations at the expense of R&D.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/news\/your-air-force\/2024\/05\/07\/one-defense-strategy-two-drastically-different-budgets\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/news\/your-air-force\/2024\/05\/07\/one-defense-strategy-two-drastically-different-budgets\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/news\/your-air-force\/2024\/05\/07\/one-defense-strategy-two-drastically-different-budgets\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/8265997.jpg.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/8265997.jpg.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/news\/your-air-force\/2024\/05\/07\/one-defense-strategy-two-drastically-different-budgets\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/","ad_zone":"home"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Your Air Force","item":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/news\/your-air-force\/","ad_zone":"your-air-force"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"One defense strategy, two drastically different budgets"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/#website","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/","name":"Air Force TImes","description":"Independent News For Airmen | Air Force Times","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/#organization","name":"Air Force TImes","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/air-logo-white.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/air-logo-white.png","caption":"Air Force TImes"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/#\/schema\/person\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1","name":"migration","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=gcf4cb6ee0ec29e49e7a963234e4340ec","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"migration"},"url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/author\/migration\/"}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"distributor_meta":false,"distributor_terms":false,"distributor_media":false,"distributor_original_site_name":"Air Force TImes","distributor_original_site_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes","push-errors":false,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/8265997.jpg.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/84069","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=84069"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/84069\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":84074,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/84069\/revisions\/84074"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=84069"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=84069"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=84069"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/airforcetimes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=84069"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}