{"id":40366,"date":"2017-11-30T22:55:03","date_gmt":"2017-11-30T22:55:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/armytimes\/uncategorized\/2017\/11\/30\/2-star-responds-to-anonymous-email-blasting-watered-down-special-forces-training-standards\/"},"modified":"2026-08-08T02:59:06","modified_gmt":"2026-08-08T02:59:06","slug":"2-star-responds-to-anonymous-email-blasting-watered-down-special-forces-training-standards","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/armytimes\/news\/your-army\/2017\/11\/30\/2-star-responds-to-anonymous-email-blasting-watered-down-special-forces-training-standards\/","title":{"rendered":"2-star responds to anonymous email blasting watered-down Special Forces training standards"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

The Army has launched an investigation into allegations of lowered training standards and \u201cmoral cowardice\u201d among Army leaders in charge of the school that trains soldiers into Green Berets. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The accusations were lodged in an anonymous email. It was sent by a writer purporting to be speaking on behalf of an undisclosed number of trainers at the John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center and School at Fort Bragg, North Carolina.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the letter, the author says that over the past two years, a drive to increase the number of Special Forces soldiers has resulted in fundamental standards being removed, and the training cadre fear it could threaten the future of the force.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The anonymous author alleges that the school\u2019s commander, Maj. Gen. Kurt Sonntag, and other members of his command staff have put careerism ahead of building a quality force in their efforts to produce more of the elite Green Berets.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201c[The school] has devolved into a cesspool of toxic, exploitive, biased and self-serving senior officers who are bolstered by submissive, sycophantic, and just-as-culpable enlisted leaders,\u201d according to the email, shared with Army Times and other media outlets. \u201cThey have doggedly succeeded in two things; furthering their careers, and ensuring that Special Forces [are] more prolific but dangerously less capable than ever before.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Sonntag penned a response that both refutes many of the accusers\u2019 points, defends the quality of the graduates during his tenure, and expresses concern about some issues raised in the email that \u201cwarrant further evaluation.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
A U.S. Special Forces soldier with the Army National Guard explains common USSF tactics, techniques and procedures to Chile and USSF counterparts April 23, 2015, at the Camp Shelby Joint Forces Training Center, Miss., during a bilateral training exchange organized by Special Operations Command South. (U.S. Army photo by Staff Sgt. Osvaldo Equite\/Released)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Specifically, the email alleges that a command directive at the school bars remedial training or physical punishment for student infractions. Instead, the directive says only counseling or Uniform Code of Military Justice actions would be taken.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The email author also alleged that students are no longer required to pass physical standards such as a 15-foot rope climb while carrying 25 pounds, a 5-mile run under 40 minutes, and a 12-mile ruck march in under three hours, among others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The writer alleges certain students, who he lists by name in his email, tried to bribe and blackmail instructors into passing them when they failed events. The email also offers examples of students with connections to family or friends in command positions that helped them graduate when they had failed events.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The email also criticizes the school\u2019s former senior enlisted leader, Command Sgt. Maj. David Gibbs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

During an open forum with staff about putting graduates into operational units even though they failed to pass previously mandatory standards, the email\u2019s author wrote that Gibbs said: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cWe push some of these issues forward [to the Regiment] because we believe that the Groups can succeed in fixing those problem graduates when they arrive. That is an amount of risk we willingly accept, because after all it\u2019s much easier to get a tab removed at Group if he doesn\u2019t pan out, than to risk relieving what\u2019s basically a fully qualified student who might have been able to fix himself and become a solid Green Beret.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In his written response, Sonntag flatly states that no fundamental standards for Special Forces training have been removed, and neither have academic or character performance standards been adjusted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cLet me be clear, I would be proud to serve with each and every one of our Special Forces Qualification Course graduates, and I stand behind the quality of every soldier we are sending to the operational force,\u201d Sonntag wrote.<\/p>\n\n\n\t