{"id":18969,"date":"2018-05-04T16:30:26","date_gmt":"2018-05-04T16:30:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/uncategorized\/2018\/05\/04\/boeing-pushes-back-on-its-bad-reputation-on-kc-46-tanker-program\/"},"modified":"2026-08-07T21:46:37","modified_gmt":"2026-08-07T21:46:37","slug":"boeing-pushes-back-on-its-bad-reputation-on-kc-46-tanker-program","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/air\/2018\/05\/04\/boeing-pushes-back-on-its-bad-reputation-on-kc-46-tanker-program\/","title":{"rendered":"Boeing pushes back on the KC-46 program\u2019s bad reputation with the Air Force"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/atype-video-jwplayer>
Boeing Defense CEO Leanne Caret says the company will deliver tankers on time during an interview on the production line. (Jeff Martin\/Staff)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n

SEATTLE \u2014 Boeing has now racked up more than $3 billion worth of pretax charges on the KC-46 due to cost overruns<\/a> and schedule delays<\/a>, but the head of its defense business told reporters Thursday that the program\u2019s problems are, for the most part, in the rearview mirror.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last week, the company disclosed another $81 million-pretax penalty on the program in its financial report for the first quarter of 2018. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Leanne Caret, the CEO of Boeing\u2019s defense sector, put a positive spin on the cost growth, saying that the expense indicates the work that is being done to get the product right as the company sprints toward a contractual obligation to deliver 18 certified tankers this year.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThe charges we took are tied to the certification efforts and the test efforts as we continue to finish up towards first delivery,\u201d she said Thursday during a media visit to the company\u2019s KC-46 production facilities in Everett, Washington. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to the terms of Boeing\u2019s fixed-price development contract with the U.S. Air Force, the company is responsible for any costs over the $4.9 billion award.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cI think what you\u2019re seeing is that the amount of charges has continually decreased over time, again showing there has been no new technical issues,\u201d Caret said. \u201cBut we are still in a development program, and I want to make certain that the capability we\u2019re delivering to the war fighter meets their intent. So we\u2019ll do the right thing as we move forward, as we have historically.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The past several months have been difficult ones for the KC-46 development program as Boeing comes down to the wire in its efforts to deliver the first tanker<\/a> this summer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Caret has also maintained that the company can meet the \u201crequired assets available\u201d obligation, or RAA, to deliver a total of 18 certified KC-46s and nine refueling pods this year \u2014 although the actual deadline is in October.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThis isn\u2019t about one aircraft, and then we\u2019re going to get started on another one,\u201d she said. \u201cWe have an entire fleet of tankers here, and as we head toward the first delivery, we\u2019re going to be able to start really ramping up and getting these to the customers the way we need.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n

But the Air Force is more pessimistic, saying that its assessments show that the first delivery will likely not occur until the end of the year, with RAA occurring some time next spring. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Air Force Secretary Heather Wilson has been publicly dismissive<\/a> of the Boeing\u2019s progress, telling lawmakers that the company has perhaps been too focused on its lucrative commercial business<\/a> to give the tanker program the attention it deserves.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cOne of our frustrations with Boeing is they\u2019re much more focused on their commercial activity than on getting this right for the Air Force and getting these aircraft to the Air Force. And that\u2019s the message we took to them in Seattle last week,\u201d Wilson told lawmakers in March.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Boeing obviously sought to combat that perception during its media trip, in which reporters spoke with the men and women fabricating the refueling booms, installing the wiring, flight testing the aircraft and performing quality control at its Everett Modification Center. There, reporters saw four KC-46s awaiting the final touches inside, another seven tankers outside the facility and eight KC-46s about 40 miles away at Boeing Field.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Unfinished KC-46 Pegasus sit awaiting modification at Boeing’s Everett facility near Seattle. (Jeff Martin\/Staff)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

In total, Boeing has 34 KC-46s in some stage of production, and the first four aircraft planned for delivery have already flown and are in storage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Caret, who took the top Boeing defense gig in February 2016, told reporters that she wanted them to understand the magnitude of work being accomplished in Washington state and the passion of the company\u2019s workers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Overall, the picture she gave of the program\u2019s trajectory was sunny \u2014 and sometimes at odds with the Air Force perception of Boeing continually overselling how quickly it will be able to fulfill its delivery obligations. She downplayed tension with the Air Force, saying that she was \u201ctotally in line with them in terms of their sense of frustration\u201d on the program.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Although Air Force leaders have said they are dissatisfied with Boeing\u2019s performance, Caret said Boeing had not made any \u201cspecific change\u201d to production efforts because the company had already devoted its full resources to its No. 1 program. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThe real disconnect is working through flow times,\u201d she said. \u201cThere\u2019s a lot of paperwork associated with delivering a system such as this, working through our paperwork, working through the FAA and the military paperwork and making sure all of those flows align, and that\u2019s what we\u2019re in conversations with the government on, and it\u2019s collaborative.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In order to be fully certified, the KC-46 must receive an amended type certificate for the aircraft\u2019s commercial systems and a supplemental type certificate for its military-specific systems. So far, the Federal Aviation Administration has issued an ATC, and the aircraft in April wrapped up the testing necessary for the STC. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The next step will involve additional flight tests with the C-17, F-16 and KC-135 to ensure those aircraft can receive fuel from the KC-46, as well as closing out a key deficiency with the aircraft\u2019s remote visual system that must be corrected before delivery.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

So does that mean the Air Force should be doing more to make receiver aircraft available and to expedite the testing process?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThis is a team sport,\u201d Caret said. \u201cWe all collectively need to make certain that we\u2019re doing all the proper analysis, that we\u2019re having the right conversations. So I feel very comfortable with our relationship with the U.S. Air Force and the transparency that we have. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cWe collectively work together to look at every opportunity, likewise every risk to make sure that there\u2019s a balance going forward and we\u2019re doing the right thing for the war fighter.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Check back with Defense News on May 7 for an in-depth look at Boeing\u2019s plans to fix ongoing KC-46 technical issues.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“We have an entire fleet of tankers here,” according to the head of Boeing’s defense business. Defense News has traveled to check this claim.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":29478,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-noindex":"","_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-nofollow":"","_yoast_wpseo_canonical":"","_acf":"","_yoast_wpseo_primary_category":7,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","_smg_distribution_targets":[]},"categories":[7,160,12,36],"tags":[],"coauthors":[3384],"class_list":["post-18969","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-air","category-daily-news-roundup","category-industry","category-newsletters"],"acf":{"subheadline":"","legacy_arc_id":"PZVYBSI3AVBEDAMUGBQHY7GU2A","arc_canonical_url":"\/air\/2018\/05\/04\/boeing-pushes-back-on-its-bad-reputation-on-kc-46-tanker-program\/","remove_feature_photo":true,"is_sponsored":false,"subtype":"","redirect_url":"","disable_inline_ads":false,"native_logo_pretext":"Presented By:"},"yoast_head":"\nBoeing pushes back on the KC-46 program\u2019s bad reputation with the Air Force - Defense News<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\""We have an entire fleet of tankers here," according to the head of Boeing's defense business. Defense News has traveled to check this claim.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Boeing pushes back on the KC-46 program\u2019s bad reputation with the Air Force\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\""We have an entire fleet of tankers here," according to the head of Boeing's defense business. Defense News has traveled to check this claim.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/air\/2018\/05\/04\/boeing-pushes-back-on-its-bad-reputation-on-kc-46-tanker-program\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Defense News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-05-04T16:30:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-08-07T21:46:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Valerie Insinna\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Valerie Insinna\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\n\t \"@context\": \"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\n\t \"@graph\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"Article\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/air\\\/2018\\\/05\\\/04\\\/boeing-pushes-back-on-its-bad-reputation-on-kc-46-tanker-program\\\/#article\",\n\t \"isPartOf\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/air\\\/2018\\\/05\\\/04\\\/boeing-pushes-back-on-its-bad-reputation-on-kc-46-tanker-program\\\/\"\n\t },\n\t \"author\": {\n\t \"name\": \"migration\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1\"\n\t },\n\t \"headline\": \"Boeing pushes back on the KC-46 program\u2019s bad reputation with the Air Force\",\n\t \"datePublished\": \"2018-05-04T16:30:26+00:00\",\n\t \"dateModified\": \"2026-08-07T21:46:37+00:00\",\n\t \"mainEntityOfPage\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/air\\\/2018\\\/05\\\/04\\\/boeing-pushes-back-on-its-bad-reputation-on-kc-46-tanker-program\\\/\"\n\t },\n\t \"wordCount\": 1036,\n\t \"commentCount\": 0,\n\t \"publisher\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\"\n\t },\n\t \"image\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/air\\\/2018\\\/05\\\/04\\\/boeing-pushes-back-on-its-bad-reputation-on-kc-46-tanker-program\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t },\n\t \"thumbnailUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/KC-46-row-1.jpg.jpg\",\n\t \"articleSection\": [\n\t \"Air Warfare\",\n\t \"Daily News Roundup\",\n\t \"Industry\",\n\t \"Newsletters\"\n\t ],\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t \"potentialAction\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"CommentAction\",\n\t \"name\": \"Comment\",\n\t \"target\": [\n\t \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/air\\\/2018\\\/05\\\/04\\\/boeing-pushes-back-on-its-bad-reputation-on-kc-46-tanker-program\\\/#respond\"\n\t ]\n\t }\n\t ]\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"WebPage\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/air\\\/2018\\\/05\\\/04\\\/boeing-pushes-back-on-its-bad-reputation-on-kc-46-tanker-program\\\/\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/air\\\/2018\\\/05\\\/04\\\/boeing-pushes-back-on-its-bad-reputation-on-kc-46-tanker-program\\\/\",\n\t \"name\": \"Boeing pushes back on the KC-46 program\u2019s bad reputation with the Air Force - Defense News\",\n\t \"isPartOf\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#website\"\n\t },\n\t \"primaryImageOfPage\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/air\\\/2018\\\/05\\\/04\\\/boeing-pushes-back-on-its-bad-reputation-on-kc-46-tanker-program\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t },\n\t \"image\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/air\\\/2018\\\/05\\\/04\\\/boeing-pushes-back-on-its-bad-reputation-on-kc-46-tanker-program\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t },\n\t \"thumbnailUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/KC-46-row-1.jpg.jpg\",\n\t \"datePublished\": \"2018-05-04T16:30:26+00:00\",\n\t \"dateModified\": \"2026-08-07T21:46:37+00:00\",\n\t \"description\": \"\\\"We have an entire fleet of tankers here,\\\" according to the head of Boeing's defense business. Defense News has traveled to check this claim.\",\n\t \"breadcrumb\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/air\\\/2018\\\/05\\\/04\\\/boeing-pushes-back-on-its-bad-reputation-on-kc-46-tanker-program\\\/#breadcrumb\"\n\t },\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t \"potentialAction\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ReadAction\",\n\t \"target\": [\n\t \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/air\\\/2018\\\/05\\\/04\\\/boeing-pushes-back-on-its-bad-reputation-on-kc-46-tanker-program\\\/\"\n\t ]\n\t }\n\t ]\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/air\\\/2018\\\/05\\\/04\\\/boeing-pushes-back-on-its-bad-reputation-on-kc-46-tanker-program\\\/#primaryimage\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/KC-46-row-1.jpg.jpg\",\n\t \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/KC-46-row-1.jpg.jpg\"\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"BreadcrumbList\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/air\\\/2018\\\/05\\\/04\\\/boeing-pushes-back-on-its-bad-reputation-on-kc-46-tanker-program\\\/#breadcrumb\",\n\t \"itemListElement\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t \"position\": 1,\n\t \"name\": \"Home\",\n\t \"item\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t \"ad_zone\": \"home\"\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t \"position\": 2,\n\t \"name\": \"Air Warfare\",\n\t \"item\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/air\\\/\",\n\t \"ad_zone\": \"air\"\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t \"position\": 3,\n\t \"name\": \"Boeing pushes back on the KC-46 program\u2019s bad reputation with the Air Force\"\n\t }\n\t ]\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"WebSite\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#website\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t \"name\": \"Defense News\",\n\t \"description\": \"Covering the politics, business and technology of defense | Defense News\",\n\t \"publisher\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\"\n\t },\n\t \"potentialAction\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"SearchAction\",\n\t \"target\": {\n\t \"@type\": \"EntryPoint\",\n\t \"urlTemplate\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"\n\t },\n\t \"query-input\": {\n\t \"@type\": \"PropertyValueSpecification\",\n\t \"valueRequired\": true,\n\t \"valueName\": \"search_term_string\"\n\t }\n\t }\n\t ],\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\"\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\",\n\t \"name\": \"Defense News\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t \"logo\": {\n\t \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/defensenews-logo-white.png\",\n\t \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/defensenews-logo-white.png\",\n\t \"caption\": \"Defense News\"\n\t },\n\t \"image\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"\n\t }\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"Person\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1\",\n\t \"name\": \"migration\",\n\t \"image\": {\n\t \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=gcf4cb6ee0ec29e49e7a963234e4340ec\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\n\t \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\n\t \"caption\": \"migration\"\n\t },\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/author\\\/migration\\\/\"\n\t }\n\t ]\n\t}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Boeing pushes back on the KC-46 program\u2019s bad reputation with the Air Force - Defense News","description":"\"We have an entire fleet of tankers here,\" according to the head of Boeing's defense business. Defense News has traveled to check this claim.","robots":{"index":"noindex","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Boeing pushes back on the KC-46 program\u2019s bad reputation with the Air Force","og_description":"\"We have an entire fleet of tankers here,\" according to the head of Boeing's defense business. Defense News has traveled to check this claim.","og_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/air\/2018\/05\/04\/boeing-pushes-back-on-its-bad-reputation-on-kc-46-tanker-program\/","og_site_name":"Defense News","article_published_time":"2018-05-04T16:30:26+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-08-07T21:46:37+00:00","author":"Valerie Insinna","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Valerie Insinna","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/air\/2018\/05\/04\/boeing-pushes-back-on-its-bad-reputation-on-kc-46-tanker-program\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/air\/2018\/05\/04\/boeing-pushes-back-on-its-bad-reputation-on-kc-46-tanker-program\/"},"author":{"name":"migration","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/person\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1"},"headline":"Boeing pushes back on the KC-46 program\u2019s bad reputation with the Air Force","datePublished":"2018-05-04T16:30:26+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-07T21:46:37+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/air\/2018\/05\/04\/boeing-pushes-back-on-its-bad-reputation-on-kc-46-tanker-program\/"},"wordCount":1036,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/air\/2018\/05\/04\/boeing-pushes-back-on-its-bad-reputation-on-kc-46-tanker-program\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/KC-46-row-1.jpg.jpg","articleSection":["Air Warfare","Daily News Roundup","Industry","Newsletters"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/air\/2018\/05\/04\/boeing-pushes-back-on-its-bad-reputation-on-kc-46-tanker-program\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/air\/2018\/05\/04\/boeing-pushes-back-on-its-bad-reputation-on-kc-46-tanker-program\/","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/air\/2018\/05\/04\/boeing-pushes-back-on-its-bad-reputation-on-kc-46-tanker-program\/","name":"Boeing pushes back on the KC-46 program\u2019s bad reputation with the Air Force - Defense News","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/air\/2018\/05\/04\/boeing-pushes-back-on-its-bad-reputation-on-kc-46-tanker-program\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/air\/2018\/05\/04\/boeing-pushes-back-on-its-bad-reputation-on-kc-46-tanker-program\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/KC-46-row-1.jpg.jpg","datePublished":"2018-05-04T16:30:26+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-07T21:46:37+00:00","description":"\"We have an entire fleet of tankers here,\" according to the head of Boeing's defense business. Defense News has traveled to check this claim.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/air\/2018\/05\/04\/boeing-pushes-back-on-its-bad-reputation-on-kc-46-tanker-program\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/air\/2018\/05\/04\/boeing-pushes-back-on-its-bad-reputation-on-kc-46-tanker-program\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/air\/2018\/05\/04\/boeing-pushes-back-on-its-bad-reputation-on-kc-46-tanker-program\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/KC-46-row-1.jpg.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/KC-46-row-1.jpg.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/air\/2018\/05\/04\/boeing-pushes-back-on-its-bad-reputation-on-kc-46-tanker-program\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","ad_zone":"home"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Air Warfare","item":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/air\/","ad_zone":"air"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Boeing pushes back on the KC-46 program\u2019s bad reputation with the Air Force"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#website","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","name":"Defense News","description":"Covering the politics, business and technology of defense | Defense News","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization","name":"Defense News","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/defensenews-logo-white.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/defensenews-logo-white.png","caption":"Defense News"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/person\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1","name":"migration","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=gcf4cb6ee0ec29e49e7a963234e4340ec","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"migration"},"url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/author\/migration\/"}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"distributor_meta":false,"distributor_terms":false,"distributor_media":false,"distributor_original_site_name":"Defense News","distributor_original_site_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews","push-errors":false,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/KC-46-row-1.jpg.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18969","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18969"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18969\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18972,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18969\/revisions\/18972"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29478"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18969"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18969"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18969"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=18969"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}