{"id":19749,"date":"2018-07-10T15:46:52","date_gmt":"2018-07-10T15:46:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/uncategorized\/2018\/07\/10\/cyber-ambiguity-natos-digital-defense-in-doubt-amid-unstable-alliances\/"},"modified":"2026-08-08T17:56:05","modified_gmt":"2026-08-08T17:56:05","slug":"cyber-ambiguity-natos-digital-defense-in-doubt-amid-unstable-alliances","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/global\/europe\/2018\/07\/10\/cyber-ambiguity-natos-digital-defense-in-doubt-amid-unstable-alliances\/","title":{"rendered":"Cyber ambiguity: NATO\u2019s digital defense in doubt amid unstable alliances"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">WASHINGTON \u2015 The banks were broken. In 2007, financial institutions across Estonia had difficulty carrying out the simplest of tasks. The banks\u2019 servers were overloaded by a swarm of digital requests, called a distributed denial-of-service attack. Simple account withdrawals suddenly became feats of digital heroics. The banks were not alone. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Email inboxes of Estonian journalists were flooded with spam. The Ministry of Defence\u2019s website went down. The Estonian government blamed Russia for the digital blitz. The crippling cyberattack lasted for three weeks and at the time was known as perhaps the most brazen act of cyber aggression by one state on another. But more than a decade later, the alleged Russian cyberattack on Estonia is seen as a rallying cry for NATO to bolster its cyber prowess. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Today, the alliance counts cybersecurity as one of its core missions. It has placed a new cyber research center in the heart of the Baltic nation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">But amid what is viewed as a sustained campaign of Russian digital warfare on the West and the trans-Atlantic alliance \u2015 whose foundations are being questioned through a surge of populism \u2015 the very future of NATO\u2019s cyber strategy is left intentionally murky.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">During a May speech, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said he is often asked under what circumstances the organization would trigger Article 5 in the case for a cyberattack. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Article 5 is the alliance\u2019s principle of collective self-defense; an attack on one member nation is considered an attack on all member nations.<\/p>\n\n\n\t<aside class=\"smg-interstitial-link wp-block-smg-interstitial-link\">\n\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/smr\/nato-priorities\/2018\/07\/09\/trump-rips-nato-ahead-of-summit\/\" class=\"smg-interstitial-link__inner\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"smg-interstitial-link__media\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" src=\"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/AP_18137662054525.jpg.jpg?w=300\" class=\"smg-interstitial-link__image wp-post-image\" alt=\"\" \/>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"smg-interstitial-link__content\">\n\t\t\t\t<span class=\"smg-interstitial-link__kicker\">Related<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t<h3 class=\"smg-interstitial-link__title\">Trump rips NATO members ahead of summit<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p class=\"smg-interstitial-link__excerpt\">It&#039;s &quot;not fair&quot; that America spends more on NATO than allies, the president tweeted ahead of the Brussels summit.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/a>\n\t<\/aside>\n\t\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cMy answer is: We will see. The level of cyberattack that would provoke a response must remain purposefully vague, as will the nature of our response,\u201d Stoltenberg said. \u201cIt could include diplomatic and economic sanctions, cyber responses, or even conventional forces, depending on the nature and consequences of the attack.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Questions over how NATO will respond to a cyberattack come as the alliance takes steps to bolster its digital protocols. In its joint air power strategy, unveiled in late June, NATO added cyberwarfare to its joint operations programs. The document boasts of the historic threat the organization faces: \u201cFor the first time since the end of the Cold War, the Alliance has to be able to conduct operations.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In 2014, the alliance said for the first time that a cyberattack could trigger the organization\u2019s collective-defense mechanism. It has proven a successful deterrent to combat large-scale digital attacks like the reported Russian cyber assault on Estonia in 2007, said Sorin Ducaru, a former assistant secretary general of NATO. But he added that the alliance has to be more creative in deterring medium- and low-grade cyberattacks \u201cbecause that is the world we are living in.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For Estonia, an aggressive NATO cyber policy could be the difference between the smooth withdrawal of cash or a disturbing \u201cerror\u201d sign flashing on an ATM screen. An Estonian intelligence report from earlier this year predicts Russia will continue its campaign of aggression in Eastern Europe and the Baltic states through a combination of cyberattacks and information warfare.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">When it comes to digital threats, \u201ceach country has faced them alone. NATO has not adopted a unified response,\u201d former Estonia President Toomas Hendrik Ilves said during a May conference.<\/p>\n\n\n\t<aside class=\"smg-interstitial-link wp-block-smg-interstitial-link\">\n\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/smr\/nato-priorities\/2018\/06\/25\/natos-infatuation-russia-russia-russia\/\" class=\"smg-interstitial-link__inner\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"smg-interstitial-link__media\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"300\" height=\"157\" src=\"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/AP_18060387213434.jpg.jpg?w=300\" class=\"smg-interstitial-link__image wp-post-image\" alt=\"\" \/>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"smg-interstitial-link__content\">\n\t\t\t\t<span class=\"smg-interstitial-link__kicker\">Related<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t<h3 class=\"smg-interstitial-link__title\">NATO\u2019s infatuation: Russia, Russia, Russia!<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p class=\"smg-interstitial-link__excerpt\">NATO should avoid anointing more power upon Russia than the country has earned.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/a>\n\t<\/aside>\n\t\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Today, nations are still loath to share information on cyberattacks, Ilves said, recounting a story about how as president he reported a hack on Estonia to NATO. \u201cThe response was: \u2018Oh, you, too.\u2019 I don\u2019t think that\u2019s how we should be doing things.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Ilves is among those who have <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/news\/theworldpost\/wp\/2017\/10\/05\/we-need-a-global-league-to-protect-against-cyberthreats-to-democracy\/?utm_term=.349d3e467b68\"> called<\/a> for a cyber NATO \u2015 an alliance of nations cooperating in digital defense. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.defensenews.com\/smr\/nato-priorities\/2018\/06\/26\/we-need-to-be-impatient-estonias-no-2-defense-official-dives-into-nato-priorities\/\" title=\"\" class=\"\" style=\"\" target=\"_blank\">top civilian of Estonia\u2019s Ministry of Defenc<\/a>e also told Defense News that international cooperation could help thwart cyberattacks. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cI think people are realizing that we need international cooperation, and without international cooperation we simply cannot succeed in this new domain,\u201d Jonatan Vseviov said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Yet a bolstered NATO cyber response could mean a wave of new tension with Russia and China, which are seen as two of the alliance\u2019s biggest digital challengers. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It is unclear under existing NATO rules how the alliance could be more aggressive in response to cyberattacks, said Alex Crowther, a senior research fellow at the National Defense University. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cIn order for Article 5 to be voted on, it has to be something major. It pretty much has to be an armed attack or a use of force as discussed in the U.N. Charter. The most commonly adopted point of view is that people have to be hurt or killed, or property is damaged or destroyed,\u201d Crowther told Fifth Domain, a sister publication of Defense News. \u201cI have met people who say that the only attack that meets that criteria was the Stuxnet attack because it caused damage to Iranian centrifuges.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Even the hack on Estonia did not meet the criteria for triggering the principal of collective self-defense, Crowther added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><i>Aaron Mehta contributed to this report.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The very future of NATO\u2019s cyber strategy is left intentionally murky.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":40198,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-noindex":"","_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-nofollow":"","_yoast_wpseo_canonical":"","_acf":"","_yoast_wpseo_primary_category":46,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","_smg_distribution_targets":[]},"categories":[160,46,11,36,48],"tags":[],"coauthors":[3096],"class_list":["post-19749","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-daily-news-roundup","category-europe","category-global","category-newsletters","category-the-americas"],"acf":{"subheadline":"","legacy_arc_id":"YDRZP6OJJJDARJ5IDKAP2DKKRY","arc_canonical_url":"\/international\/2018\/07\/09\/cyber-ambiguity-natos-digital-defense-in-doubt-amid-unstable-alliances\/","remove_feature_photo":false,"is_sponsored":false,"subtype":"","redirect_url":"","disable_inline_ads":false,"native_logo_pretext":"Presented By:"},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.0 (Yoast SEO v28.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Cyber ambiguity: NATO\u2019s digital defense in doubt amid unstable alliances - Defense News<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The very future of NATO\u2019s cyber strategy is left intentionally murky.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cyber ambiguity: NATO\u2019s digital defense in doubt amid unstable alliances\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The very future of NATO\u2019s cyber strategy is left intentionally murky.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/global\/europe\/2018\/07\/10\/cyber-ambiguity-natos-digital-defense-in-doubt-amid-unstable-alliances\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Defense News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-07-10T15:46:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-08-08T17:56:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Justin Lynch\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Justin Lynch\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\n\t    \"@context\": \"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\n\t    \"@graph\": [\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"Article\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/global\\\/europe\\\/2018\\\/07\\\/10\\\/cyber-ambiguity-natos-digital-defense-in-doubt-amid-unstable-alliances\\\/#article\",\n\t            \"isPartOf\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/global\\\/europe\\\/2018\\\/07\\\/10\\\/cyber-ambiguity-natos-digital-defense-in-doubt-amid-unstable-alliances\\\/\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"author\": {\n\t                \"name\": \"migration\",\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"headline\": \"Cyber ambiguity: NATO\u2019s digital defense in doubt amid unstable alliances\",\n\t            \"datePublished\": \"2018-07-10T15:46:52+00:00\",\n\t            \"dateModified\": \"2026-08-08T17:56:05+00:00\",\n\t            \"mainEntityOfPage\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/global\\\/europe\\\/2018\\\/07\\\/10\\\/cyber-ambiguity-natos-digital-defense-in-doubt-amid-unstable-alliances\\\/\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"wordCount\": 821,\n\t            \"commentCount\": 0,\n\t            \"publisher\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/global\\\/europe\\\/2018\\\/07\\\/10\\\/cyber-ambiguity-natos-digital-defense-in-doubt-amid-unstable-alliances\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"thumbnailUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/12_special_mainvertical-Cropped.jpg.jpg\",\n\t            \"articleSection\": [\n\t                \"Daily News Roundup\",\n\t                \"Europe\",\n\t                \"Global\",\n\t                \"Newsletters\",\n\t                \"The Americas\"\n\t            ],\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t            \"potentialAction\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"CommentAction\",\n\t                    \"name\": \"Comment\",\n\t                    \"target\": [\n\t                        \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/global\\\/europe\\\/2018\\\/07\\\/10\\\/cyber-ambiguity-natos-digital-defense-in-doubt-amid-unstable-alliances\\\/#respond\"\n\t                    ]\n\t                }\n\t            ]\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"WebPage\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/global\\\/europe\\\/2018\\\/07\\\/10\\\/cyber-ambiguity-natos-digital-defense-in-doubt-amid-unstable-alliances\\\/\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/global\\\/europe\\\/2018\\\/07\\\/10\\\/cyber-ambiguity-natos-digital-defense-in-doubt-amid-unstable-alliances\\\/\",\n\t            \"name\": \"Cyber ambiguity: NATO\u2019s digital defense in doubt amid unstable alliances - Defense News\",\n\t            \"isPartOf\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#website\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"primaryImageOfPage\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/global\\\/europe\\\/2018\\\/07\\\/10\\\/cyber-ambiguity-natos-digital-defense-in-doubt-amid-unstable-alliances\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/global\\\/europe\\\/2018\\\/07\\\/10\\\/cyber-ambiguity-natos-digital-defense-in-doubt-amid-unstable-alliances\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"thumbnailUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/12_special_mainvertical-Cropped.jpg.jpg\",\n\t            \"datePublished\": \"2018-07-10T15:46:52+00:00\",\n\t            \"dateModified\": \"2026-08-08T17:56:05+00:00\",\n\t            \"description\": \"The very future of NATO\u2019s cyber strategy is left intentionally murky.\",\n\t            \"breadcrumb\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/global\\\/europe\\\/2018\\\/07\\\/10\\\/cyber-ambiguity-natos-digital-defense-in-doubt-amid-unstable-alliances\\\/#breadcrumb\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t            \"potentialAction\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ReadAction\",\n\t                    \"target\": [\n\t                        \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/global\\\/europe\\\/2018\\\/07\\\/10\\\/cyber-ambiguity-natos-digital-defense-in-doubt-amid-unstable-alliances\\\/\"\n\t                    ]\n\t                }\n\t            ]\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/global\\\/europe\\\/2018\\\/07\\\/10\\\/cyber-ambiguity-natos-digital-defense-in-doubt-amid-unstable-alliances\\\/#primaryimage\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/12_special_mainvertical-Cropped.jpg.jpg\",\n\t            \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/12_special_mainvertical-Cropped.jpg.jpg\"\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"BreadcrumbList\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/global\\\/europe\\\/2018\\\/07\\\/10\\\/cyber-ambiguity-natos-digital-defense-in-doubt-amid-unstable-alliances\\\/#breadcrumb\",\n\t            \"itemListElement\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 1,\n\t                    \"name\": \"Home\",\n\t                    \"item\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t                    \"ad_zone\": \"home\"\n\t                },\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 2,\n\t                    \"name\": \"Global\",\n\t                    \"item\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/global\\\/\",\n\t                    \"ad_zone\": \"global\"\n\t                },\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 3,\n\t                    \"name\": \"Europe\",\n\t                    \"item\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/global\\\/europe\\\/\",\n\t                    \"ad_zone\": \"europe\"\n\t                },\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 4,\n\t                    \"name\": \"Cyber ambiguity: NATO\u2019s digital defense in doubt amid unstable alliances\"\n\t                }\n\t            ]\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"WebSite\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#website\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t            \"name\": \"Defense News\",\n\t            \"description\": \"Covering the politics, business and technology of defense | Defense News\",\n\t            \"publisher\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"potentialAction\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"SearchAction\",\n\t                    \"target\": {\n\t                        \"@type\": \"EntryPoint\",\n\t                        \"urlTemplate\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"\n\t                    },\n\t                    \"query-input\": {\n\t                        \"@type\": \"PropertyValueSpecification\",\n\t                        \"valueRequired\": true,\n\t                        \"valueName\": \"search_term_string\"\n\t                    }\n\t                }\n\t            ],\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\"\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\",\n\t            \"name\": \"Defense News\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t            \"logo\": {\n\t                \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t                \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\n\t                \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/defensenews-logo-white.png\",\n\t                \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/defensenews-logo-white.png\",\n\t                \"caption\": \"Defense News\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"\n\t            }\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"Person\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1\",\n\t            \"name\": \"migration\",\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t                \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=gcf4cb6ee0ec29e49e7a963234e4340ec\",\n\t                \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\n\t                \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\n\t                \"caption\": \"migration\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/author\\\/migration\\\/\"\n\t        }\n\t    ]\n\t}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cyber ambiguity: NATO\u2019s digital defense in doubt amid unstable alliances - Defense News","description":"The very future of NATO\u2019s cyber strategy is left intentionally murky.","robots":{"index":"noindex","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cyber ambiguity: NATO\u2019s digital defense in doubt amid unstable alliances","og_description":"The very future of NATO\u2019s cyber strategy is left intentionally murky.","og_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/global\/europe\/2018\/07\/10\/cyber-ambiguity-natos-digital-defense-in-doubt-amid-unstable-alliances\/","og_site_name":"Defense News","article_published_time":"2018-07-10T15:46:52+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-08-08T17:56:05+00:00","author":"Justin Lynch","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Justin Lynch","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/global\/europe\/2018\/07\/10\/cyber-ambiguity-natos-digital-defense-in-doubt-amid-unstable-alliances\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/global\/europe\/2018\/07\/10\/cyber-ambiguity-natos-digital-defense-in-doubt-amid-unstable-alliances\/"},"author":{"name":"migration","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/person\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1"},"headline":"Cyber ambiguity: NATO\u2019s digital defense in doubt amid unstable alliances","datePublished":"2018-07-10T15:46:52+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-08T17:56:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/global\/europe\/2018\/07\/10\/cyber-ambiguity-natos-digital-defense-in-doubt-amid-unstable-alliances\/"},"wordCount":821,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/global\/europe\/2018\/07\/10\/cyber-ambiguity-natos-digital-defense-in-doubt-amid-unstable-alliances\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/12_special_mainvertical-Cropped.jpg.jpg","articleSection":["Daily News Roundup","Europe","Global","Newsletters","The Americas"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/global\/europe\/2018\/07\/10\/cyber-ambiguity-natos-digital-defense-in-doubt-amid-unstable-alliances\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/global\/europe\/2018\/07\/10\/cyber-ambiguity-natos-digital-defense-in-doubt-amid-unstable-alliances\/","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/global\/europe\/2018\/07\/10\/cyber-ambiguity-natos-digital-defense-in-doubt-amid-unstable-alliances\/","name":"Cyber ambiguity: NATO\u2019s digital defense in doubt amid unstable alliances - Defense News","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/global\/europe\/2018\/07\/10\/cyber-ambiguity-natos-digital-defense-in-doubt-amid-unstable-alliances\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/global\/europe\/2018\/07\/10\/cyber-ambiguity-natos-digital-defense-in-doubt-amid-unstable-alliances\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/12_special_mainvertical-Cropped.jpg.jpg","datePublished":"2018-07-10T15:46:52+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-08T17:56:05+00:00","description":"The very future of NATO\u2019s cyber strategy is left intentionally murky.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/global\/europe\/2018\/07\/10\/cyber-ambiguity-natos-digital-defense-in-doubt-amid-unstable-alliances\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/global\/europe\/2018\/07\/10\/cyber-ambiguity-natos-digital-defense-in-doubt-amid-unstable-alliances\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/global\/europe\/2018\/07\/10\/cyber-ambiguity-natos-digital-defense-in-doubt-amid-unstable-alliances\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/12_special_mainvertical-Cropped.jpg.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/12_special_mainvertical-Cropped.jpg.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/global\/europe\/2018\/07\/10\/cyber-ambiguity-natos-digital-defense-in-doubt-amid-unstable-alliances\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","ad_zone":"home"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Global","item":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/global\/","ad_zone":"global"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Europe","item":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/global\/europe\/","ad_zone":"europe"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":4,"name":"Cyber ambiguity: NATO\u2019s digital defense in doubt amid unstable alliances"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#website","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","name":"Defense News","description":"Covering the politics, business and technology of defense | Defense News","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization","name":"Defense News","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/defensenews-logo-white.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/defensenews-logo-white.png","caption":"Defense News"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/person\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1","name":"migration","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=gcf4cb6ee0ec29e49e7a963234e4340ec","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"migration"},"url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/author\/migration\/"}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"distributor_meta":false,"distributor_terms":false,"distributor_media":false,"distributor_original_site_name":"Defense News","distributor_original_site_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews","push-errors":false,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/12_special_mainvertical-Cropped.jpg.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19749","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19749"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19749\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":81072,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19749\/revisions\/81072"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/40198"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19749"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19749"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19749"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=19749"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}