{"id":25316,"date":"2020-08-16T23:00:00","date_gmt":"2020-08-16T23:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/uncategorized\/2020\/08\/16\/t-minus-ai-a-look-at-the-intersection-of-geopolitics-and-autonomy\/"},"modified":"2026-08-08T17:53:51","modified_gmt":"2026-08-08T17:53:51","slug":"t-minus-ai-a-look-at-the-intersection-of-geopolitics-and-autonomy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/commentary\/2020\/08\/16\/t-minus-ai-a-look-at-the-intersection-of-geopolitics-and-autonomy\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018T-Minus AI\u2019: A look at the intersection of geopolitics and autonomy"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

China has a national plan for it. Russia says it will determine the \u201cruler of the world.\u201d The United States is investing heavily to develop it.<\/i><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The race is on to create, control and weaponize <\/i>artificial intelligence<\/i><\/a>.<\/i><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In Michael Kanaan\u2019s book \u201c<\/i>T-Minus AI: Humanity\u2019s Countdown to Artificial Intelligence and the New Pursuit of Global Power<\/i><\/a>,\u201d set for release Aug. 25, the realities of AI from a human-oriented perspective are laid out for the reader. Such technology, often shrouded in mystery and misunderstood, is made easy to comprehend through a discussion on the global implications of developing AI. Kanaan is one of the Air Force\u2019s AI leaders.<\/i><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The following excerpt, edited for length and clarity, introduces how, in late 2017, the conversation about artificial intelligence changed forever.<\/i><\/p>\n\n\n\n

It was a Friday morning, Sept. 1, 2017, and not yet dawn when I stepped out of Reagan National Airport and followed my bag into the back of a waiting SUV. After flying east all night from San Francisco to D.C., I still had two hours before a Pentagon briefing with Lt. Gen. VeraLinn \u201cDash\u201d Jamieson. She was the deputy chief of staff for U.S. Air Force intelligence and the country\u2019s most senior Air Force intelligence officer, a three-star officer responsible for a staff of 30,000 and an overall budget of $55 billion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As the Air Force lead officer for artificial intelligence and machine learning, I\u2019d been reporting directly to Jamieson for over two years. The briefing that morning was to discuss the commitments we\u2019d just received from two of Silicon Valley\u2019s most prominent AI companies. After months of collective effort, the new agreements were significant steps forward. They were also crucial proof that the long history of cooperation between the American public and private sectors could reasonably be expected to continue. With the world marching steadfastly into the promising but unsettled fields of AI, it was becoming critical that Americans do so, if not entirely in harmony, then at least to the sounds of the same beat.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

My apartment was only a short ride away. I was looking forward to a hot shower and strong coffee. But as the SUV pulled out of the terminal and into the morning darkness, a message alert pinged from my phone. It was a text from the general. Short and to the point, as usual. \u201cSee Putin comments re AI.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A quick web search pulled up a quote already posting to news feeds everywhere. At a televised symposium broadcast throughout Russia only an hour earlier, President Vladimir Putin had crafted a sound bite making headlines around the globe. His unambiguous three sentences translated to: \u201cArtificial intelligence is the future, not only for Russia, but for all humankind. It comes with colossal opportunities, but also threats that are difficult to predict. Whoever becomes the leader in this sphere will become the ruler of the world.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Russian President Vladimir Putin, on screen, speaks during a panel discussion as part of the Artificial Intelligence Journey forum in Moscow on Nov. 9, 2019. (Alexey Nikolsky\/Sputnik via AFP and Getty Images)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

As the driver accelerated up the Interstate 395 ramp toward the city, a heavy rain started to fall, hitting hard against the car\u2019s metal surfaces. Far off, through the window on my right, the dome of the Capitol building glistened in white light beyond the blurred, dark space of the Potomac River. Playing at background volume over the front speakers, a National Public Radio newscaster was describing a 3-mile-wide asteroid named Florence. Streaking past our planet that morning, the massive rock would be little more than 4 million miles away at its closest point \u2014 tremendously far by human standards, but breathtakingly near by the infinite scales of space. It was the largest object NASA had ever tracked to pass so closely by our planet. On only a slightly different trajectory, it would have altered Earth\u2019s entire landscape. And, like for the dinosaurs before us, it would have changed everything. It would have changed life. \u201cA perfect metaphor,\u201d I thought, \u201cimpeccably timed to coincide with Putin\u2019s comments about AI.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I looked back at his words. The message they carried rang like an alarm I didn\u2019t need to hear, but the motivation behind them wasn\u2019t so clear. Former KGB officers speak carefully and only for calculated reasons. Putin is no exception. His words matter, always. And so does his purpose. But what was it here? Just to offer a commentary or forecast? No. Not his style. A call to action, then, to energize his own population? Perhaps. But, more than that, this was a statement to other statesmen, a confirmation that he and his government were awake and aware that a sophisticatedly deep effort was underway to accomplish a new world order.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Only a month earlier, China had released a massive three-part strategy aimed at achieving very clear benchmarks of advances in AI. First, by 2020, China planned to match the highest levels of AI technology and application capabilities in the U.S. or anywhere else in the world. Second, by 2025, they intend to capture a verifiable lead over all countries in the development and production of core AI technologies, including voice- and visual-recognition systems. Last, by 2030, China intends to dominantly lead all countries in all aspects and related fields of AI. To be the sole leader, the world\u2019s unquestioned and controlling epicenter of AI. Period. That is China\u2019s declared national plan.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

With the Chinese government\u2019s newly published AI agenda available for the world to see, Putin\u2019s words resolved any ambiguity about its implication. True to his style, his message was clear and concise. \u201cWhoever becomes the leader \u2026 will become the ruler of the world.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cStraightforward,\u201d I thought. \u201cAnd he\u2019s right.\u201d But focused administrations around the globe already know the profound potential of AI. The Chinese clearly do \u2014 it\u2019s driving their domestic and foreign agendas. And the Saudis, the European Union nations, the U.K., and the Canadians \u2014 they know it, too. And private enterprise is certainly focused in, from Google, Facebook, Amazon, Apple and Microsoft to their Chinese state-controlled counterparts \u2014 Baidu, Alibaba, Tencent and the telecom giant Huawei.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AI technologies have been methodically evolving since the 1960s, but over most of those years, the advances were sporadic and relatively slow. From the earliest days, private funding and government support for AI research ebbed and flowed in direct relation to the successes and failures of the latest predictions and promises. At the lowest points of progress, when little was being accomplished, investment capital dried up. And when it did, efforts slowed. It was the usual interdependent circle of cause and effect. Twice, during the late \u201970s and then again during the late \u201980s and early \u201990s, the pace of progress all but stopped. Those years became known as the AI winters.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But, in the last 10 to 15 years, a number of major breakthroughs, in machine learning in particular, again propelled AI out of the dark and into another invigorated stage. A new momentum emerged, and an unmistakable race started to take shape. Insightful governments and industry leaders began doing everything possible to stay within reach of the lead, positioning themselves for any possible path to the front.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Now, for all to hear, Putin had just declared everything at stake. Without any room for misunderstanding, he equated AI superiority to global supremacy, to a strength akin to economic or even nuclear domination. He said it for public consumption, but it was rife with political purpose. \u201cWhoever becomes the leader in this sphere will become the ruler of the world.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Those words would undoubtedly add another level of urgency to the day\u2019s meetings. That was certain. I redirected the driver to the Pentagon and looked down at my phone to answer the general\u2019s text. \u201cLanded. Saw quote. On my way in.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The shower would have to wait.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

***<\/b><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the months that followed, Putin\u2019s now infamous few sentences proved impactful across continents, industries and governments. His comments provided the additional, final push that accelerated the planet\u2019s sense of seriousness about AI and propelled most everyone into a higher gear forward. Public and private enterprises around the globe reassessed their focuses and levels of commitment. Governments and industries that had previously dedicated only minimal percentages of their research and defense budgets to the new technology suddenly saw things differently. It quickly became unacceptable to slow-walk AI efforts and protocols, and no longer defensible to incubate AI innovations for longer than the shortest time necessary.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Now, not long after, the pace of the race has quickened to a full sprint. National strategies and demonstratable use have become the measurements that matter. Rollouts have become requisite. To accomplish them, agendas are more focused, aggressive and well funded. Sooner than many expected, AI is proving itself a dominant force of economic, political and cultural influence, and is poised to transform much of what we know and much of what we do. China, Russia and others are utilizing AI in ways the world needs to recognize. That\u2019s not to say all efforts and iterations in the West are without criticism. They\u2019re not. But if this new technology causes or contributes to a shift in power from the West to the East, everyone will be affected. Everything will change.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
The author, Michael Kanaan, is the co-chair of artificial intelligence for the U.S. Air Force at the Pentagon. (Courtesy of BenBella)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The future is here, and the world ahead looks far different than ever before.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

No longer just science fiction or fantastic speculation, artificial intelligence is real. It\u2019s here, all around us, and it has already become an integral and influential part of our lives. Although we\u2019ve taken only our first few steps into this new frontier of technological innovation, AI is providing us powerful new methods of conducting our affairs and accomplishing our goals. We use these new tools every day, usually without choice and often without even realizing it \u2014 from applications that streamline our personal lives and social activities to business programs and practices that enable new ways of acquiring a competitive advantage. I\u2019ve learned a lot about the common misperceptions and misgivings people have when trying to understand AI. Most conversations about artificial intelligence either begin or end with one or more of the following questions:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

  1. What exactly is AI?<\/li>
  2. What aspects of our lives will be changed by it?<\/li>
  3. Which of those changes will be beneficial and which of them harmful?<\/li>
  4. Where do the nations of the world stand in relation to one another, especially China and Russia<\/li>
  5. What can we do to ensure that AI is only used in legal, moral and ethical ways?<\/li><\/ol>\n\n\n\n

    Although the answers to those questions merit long discussions and are open to differing opinions, they should at least be manageable and factually accurate. The topics shouldn\u2019t be too difficult to discuss or debate \u2014 not conversationally or even at policymaking or political levels. Unfortunately, they generally are.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    But the conversational disconnects that usually occur aren\u2019t because of some complex technical details or confusing computer issues. Instead, it\u2019s usually, simply, because of the same old obstacles that too often stand in the way of many other conversations. Regardless of the topic, and even when it matters most, we too frequently speak below, above, around or past one another \u2014 especially when we don\u2019t have an equal amount of information, a shared base of knowledge or a common set of experiences. In those instances, we make too many assumptions, allow too many things to go without saying and use too many words that hold different meanings for different people. In short, too many confusions are never clarified and too many more are created. As a consequence, we\u2019re doomed for frustration and failure from the start, inevitably unable to understand one another and incapable of appreciating each other\u2019s perspectives and talking points. My goal throughout this book is to avoid those pitfalls.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    The best way to start is to first address the most common misperceptions of all, the ones we tend to bring with us into the AI conversation. The first of these is the assumption that AI is unavoidably destined, sooner or later, to develop its own consciousness and its own autonomous, evil intent. For that idea, we can thank science fiction and the entertainment industry. Make no mistake, I\u2019m an ardent fan of science fiction, both on screen and in books. Without any doubt, the sci-fi genre has given us fine works of imagination, insight and art. Many great fiction writers and filmmakers are extremely knowledgeable about technology and conscientiously concerned about our future. Time and again they\u2019ve proven themselves true visionaries, and we\u2019re unquestionably better off for their work. They spark our curiosity, ignite our imaginations, increase our appetite for knowledge, and encourage our interests in science and societal issues.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    But when it comes to their scientific portrayals of artificial intelligence, our most popular authors and screenwriters have too often generated an array of exotic fears by focusing our attention on distant, dystopian possibilities instead of present-day realities. Science fiction that depicts AI usually aligns a computer\u2019s intelligence with consciousness, and then frightens us by portraying future worlds in which AI isn\u2019t only conscious, but also evil-minded and intent, self-motivated even, to overtake and destroy us. To create drama, there has to be conflict, and the humans in these stories are almost always overwhelmed and outmatched, naturally unable to compete against the machines\u2019 vastly superior intelligence and mechanical strength. Iconic movies like \u201c2001: A Space Odyssey,\u201d \u201cThe Matrix,\u201d \u201cThe Terminator,\u201d \u201cEx Machina,\u201d and \u201cI, Robot,\u201d along with television series such as \u201cWestworld\u201d and \u201cBlack Mirror,\u201d have turned our underlying fears and suspicions into deep-seated and bleak expectations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Even today, commercial companies that offer AI products and consumer services routinely have to fight our distrust of intelligent machines as a basic, necessary part of their regular marketing efforts. Just think of all the television commercials for AI-enabled products we now see, and consider how many of them are focused first on trying to put us at ease by casting a polite and gentle glow to the figurative, artificial face of their AI, even when that face has absolutely nothing to do with the services their products actually provide.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    AI is an extremely powerful tool, and it has immense implications we must consider and evaluate carefully. It\u2019s a very sharp instrument that shouldn\u2019t be callously wielded or casually accepted, especially when it\u2019s in the wrong hands or when it\u2019s used for intentionally intrusive or oppressive purposes. These are serious issues, and there are significant steps we must take to ensure AI is properly designed and implemented. Fortunately, and contrary to what many people think, it\u2019s not necessary to have a background in computer science, mathematics or engineering in order to very meaningfully understand AI and its technological implications. With just a basic comprehension of a few fundamental concepts behind today\u2019s computers and related sciences, it\u2019s entirely possible to connect the relevant dots and understand the overall picture.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Creating tools to facilitate our lives is the strength of humankind. It\u2019s what we do. Given enough time, it was arguable, perhaps even inevitable, that we would create the ultimate tool \u2014 artificial intelligence itself. But what exactly does it mean that we\u2019ve accomplished that task? And how is AI even possible? In large part, the answers lie in the history of ourselves and of our own biological intelligence. It turns out that artificially replicating what we know about the human thought process, at least as best we can, is a highly effective blueprint for creating something similar in a machine. It\u2019s our own evolution and our own history that teach us the fundamentals that make it all possible.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    China has a national plan for it. Russia says it will determine the \u201cruler of the world.\u201d The United States is investing heavily to develop it. The race is on to create, control and weaponize artificial intelligence.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":54808,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-noindex":"","_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-nofollow":"","_yoast_wpseo_canonical":"","_acf":"","_yoast_wpseo_primary_category":66,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","_smg_distribution_targets":[]},"categories":[66,160,12,49,36,17],"tags":[],"coauthors":[7579],"class_list":["post-25316","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-commentary","category-daily-news-roundup","category-industry","category-techwatch","category-newsletters","category-opinion"],"acf":{"subheadline":"","legacy_arc_id":"4IW6SIVMJVFQDBM5BDF2GPNYOE","arc_canonical_url":"\/opinion\/2020\/08\/16\/t-minus-ai-a-look-at-the-intersection-of-geopolitics-and-autonomy\/","remove_feature_photo":false,"is_sponsored":false,"subtype":"","redirect_url":"","disable_inline_ads":false,"native_logo_pretext":"Presented By:"},"yoast_head":"\n\u2018T-Minus AI\u2019: A look at the intersection of geopolitics and autonomy - Defense News<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"China has a national plan for it. Russia says it will determine the \u201cruler of the world.\u201d The United States is investing heavily to develop it. The race is on to create, control and weaponize artificial intelligence.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018T-Minus AI\u2019: A look at the intersection of geopolitics and autonomy\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"China has a national plan for it. Russia says it will determine the \u201cruler of the world.\u201d The United States is investing heavily to develop it. The race is on to create, control and weaponize artificial intelligence.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/commentary\/2020\/08\/16\/t-minus-ai-a-look-at-the-intersection-of-geopolitics-and-autonomy\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Defense News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-08-16T23:00:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-08-08T17:53:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Michael Kanaan\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Michael Kanaan\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"13 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\n\t \"@context\": \"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\n\t \"@graph\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"Article\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/commentary\\\/2020\\\/08\\\/16\\\/t-minus-ai-a-look-at-the-intersection-of-geopolitics-and-autonomy\\\/#article\",\n\t \"isPartOf\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/commentary\\\/2020\\\/08\\\/16\\\/t-minus-ai-a-look-at-the-intersection-of-geopolitics-and-autonomy\\\/\"\n\t },\n\t \"author\": {\n\t \"name\": \"migration\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1\"\n\t },\n\t \"headline\": \"\u2018T-Minus AI\u2019: A look at the intersection of geopolitics and autonomy\",\n\t \"datePublished\": \"2020-08-16T23:00:00+00:00\",\n\t \"dateModified\": \"2026-08-08T17:53:51+00:00\",\n\t \"mainEntityOfPage\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/commentary\\\/2020\\\/08\\\/16\\\/t-minus-ai-a-look-at-the-intersection-of-geopolitics-and-autonomy\\\/\"\n\t },\n\t \"wordCount\": 2658,\n\t \"commentCount\": 0,\n\t \"publisher\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\"\n\t },\n\t \"image\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/commentary\\\/2020\\\/08\\\/16\\\/t-minus-ai-a-look-at-the-intersection-of-geopolitics-and-autonomy\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t },\n\t \"thumbnailUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/34_c4isrnet_book.jpg.jpg\",\n\t \"articleSection\": [\n\t \"Commentary\",\n\t \"Daily News Roundup\",\n\t \"Industry\",\n\t \"MilTech\",\n\t \"Newsletters\",\n\t \"Opinion\"\n\t ],\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t \"potentialAction\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"CommentAction\",\n\t \"name\": \"Comment\",\n\t \"target\": [\n\t \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/commentary\\\/2020\\\/08\\\/16\\\/t-minus-ai-a-look-at-the-intersection-of-geopolitics-and-autonomy\\\/#respond\"\n\t ]\n\t }\n\t ]\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"WebPage\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/commentary\\\/2020\\\/08\\\/16\\\/t-minus-ai-a-look-at-the-intersection-of-geopolitics-and-autonomy\\\/\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/commentary\\\/2020\\\/08\\\/16\\\/t-minus-ai-a-look-at-the-intersection-of-geopolitics-and-autonomy\\\/\",\n\t \"name\": \"\u2018T-Minus AI\u2019: A look at the intersection of geopolitics and autonomy - Defense News\",\n\t \"isPartOf\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#website\"\n\t },\n\t \"primaryImageOfPage\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/commentary\\\/2020\\\/08\\\/16\\\/t-minus-ai-a-look-at-the-intersection-of-geopolitics-and-autonomy\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t },\n\t \"image\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/commentary\\\/2020\\\/08\\\/16\\\/t-minus-ai-a-look-at-the-intersection-of-geopolitics-and-autonomy\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t },\n\t \"thumbnailUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/34_c4isrnet_book.jpg.jpg\",\n\t \"datePublished\": \"2020-08-16T23:00:00+00:00\",\n\t \"dateModified\": \"2026-08-08T17:53:51+00:00\",\n\t \"description\": \"China has a national plan for it. Russia says it will determine the \u201cruler of the world.\u201d The United States is investing heavily to develop it. The race is on to create, control and weaponize artificial intelligence.\",\n\t \"breadcrumb\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/commentary\\\/2020\\\/08\\\/16\\\/t-minus-ai-a-look-at-the-intersection-of-geopolitics-and-autonomy\\\/#breadcrumb\"\n\t },\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t \"potentialAction\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ReadAction\",\n\t \"target\": [\n\t \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/commentary\\\/2020\\\/08\\\/16\\\/t-minus-ai-a-look-at-the-intersection-of-geopolitics-and-autonomy\\\/\"\n\t ]\n\t }\n\t ]\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/commentary\\\/2020\\\/08\\\/16\\\/t-minus-ai-a-look-at-the-intersection-of-geopolitics-and-autonomy\\\/#primaryimage\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/34_c4isrnet_book.jpg.jpg\",\n\t \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/34_c4isrnet_book.jpg.jpg\"\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"BreadcrumbList\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/commentary\\\/2020\\\/08\\\/16\\\/t-minus-ai-a-look-at-the-intersection-of-geopolitics-and-autonomy\\\/#breadcrumb\",\n\t \"itemListElement\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t \"position\": 1,\n\t \"name\": \"Home\",\n\t \"item\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t \"ad_zone\": \"home\"\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t \"position\": 2,\n\t \"name\": \"Commentary\",\n\t \"item\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/commentary\\\/\",\n\t \"ad_zone\": \"commentary\"\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t \"position\": 3,\n\t \"name\": \"\u2018T-Minus AI\u2019: A look at the intersection of geopolitics and autonomy\"\n\t }\n\t ]\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"WebSite\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#website\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t \"name\": \"Defense News\",\n\t \"description\": \"Covering the politics, business and technology of defense | Defense News\",\n\t \"publisher\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\"\n\t },\n\t \"potentialAction\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"SearchAction\",\n\t \"target\": {\n\t \"@type\": \"EntryPoint\",\n\t \"urlTemplate\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"\n\t },\n\t \"query-input\": {\n\t \"@type\": \"PropertyValueSpecification\",\n\t \"valueRequired\": true,\n\t \"valueName\": \"search_term_string\"\n\t }\n\t }\n\t ],\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\"\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\",\n\t \"name\": \"Defense News\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t \"logo\": {\n\t \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/defensenews-logo-white.png\",\n\t \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/defensenews-logo-white.png\",\n\t \"caption\": \"Defense News\"\n\t },\n\t \"image\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"\n\t }\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"Person\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1\",\n\t \"name\": \"migration\",\n\t \"image\": {\n\t \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=gcf4cb6ee0ec29e49e7a963234e4340ec\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\n\t \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\n\t \"caption\": \"migration\"\n\t },\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/author\\\/migration\\\/\"\n\t }\n\t ]\n\t}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u2018T-Minus AI\u2019: A look at the intersection of geopolitics and autonomy - Defense News","description":"China has a national plan for it. Russia says it will determine the \u201cruler of the world.\u201d The United States is investing heavily to develop it. The race is on to create, control and weaponize artificial intelligence.","robots":{"index":"noindex","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018T-Minus AI\u2019: A look at the intersection of geopolitics and autonomy","og_description":"China has a national plan for it. Russia says it will determine the \u201cruler of the world.\u201d The United States is investing heavily to develop it. The race is on to create, control and weaponize artificial intelligence.","og_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/commentary\/2020\/08\/16\/t-minus-ai-a-look-at-the-intersection-of-geopolitics-and-autonomy\/","og_site_name":"Defense News","article_published_time":"2020-08-16T23:00:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-08-08T17:53:51+00:00","author":"Michael Kanaan","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Michael Kanaan","Est. reading time":"13 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/commentary\/2020\/08\/16\/t-minus-ai-a-look-at-the-intersection-of-geopolitics-and-autonomy\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/commentary\/2020\/08\/16\/t-minus-ai-a-look-at-the-intersection-of-geopolitics-and-autonomy\/"},"author":{"name":"migration","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/person\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1"},"headline":"\u2018T-Minus AI\u2019: A look at the intersection of geopolitics and autonomy","datePublished":"2020-08-16T23:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-08T17:53:51+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/commentary\/2020\/08\/16\/t-minus-ai-a-look-at-the-intersection-of-geopolitics-and-autonomy\/"},"wordCount":2658,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/commentary\/2020\/08\/16\/t-minus-ai-a-look-at-the-intersection-of-geopolitics-and-autonomy\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/34_c4isrnet_book.jpg.jpg","articleSection":["Commentary","Daily News Roundup","Industry","MilTech","Newsletters","Opinion"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/commentary\/2020\/08\/16\/t-minus-ai-a-look-at-the-intersection-of-geopolitics-and-autonomy\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/commentary\/2020\/08\/16\/t-minus-ai-a-look-at-the-intersection-of-geopolitics-and-autonomy\/","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/commentary\/2020\/08\/16\/t-minus-ai-a-look-at-the-intersection-of-geopolitics-and-autonomy\/","name":"\u2018T-Minus AI\u2019: A look at the intersection of geopolitics and autonomy - Defense News","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/commentary\/2020\/08\/16\/t-minus-ai-a-look-at-the-intersection-of-geopolitics-and-autonomy\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/commentary\/2020\/08\/16\/t-minus-ai-a-look-at-the-intersection-of-geopolitics-and-autonomy\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/34_c4isrnet_book.jpg.jpg","datePublished":"2020-08-16T23:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-08T17:53:51+00:00","description":"China has a national plan for it. Russia says it will determine the \u201cruler of the world.\u201d The United States is investing heavily to develop it. The race is on to create, control and weaponize artificial intelligence.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/commentary\/2020\/08\/16\/t-minus-ai-a-look-at-the-intersection-of-geopolitics-and-autonomy\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/commentary\/2020\/08\/16\/t-minus-ai-a-look-at-the-intersection-of-geopolitics-and-autonomy\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/commentary\/2020\/08\/16\/t-minus-ai-a-look-at-the-intersection-of-geopolitics-and-autonomy\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/34_c4isrnet_book.jpg.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/34_c4isrnet_book.jpg.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/commentary\/2020\/08\/16\/t-minus-ai-a-look-at-the-intersection-of-geopolitics-and-autonomy\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","ad_zone":"home"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Commentary","item":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/commentary\/","ad_zone":"commentary"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"\u2018T-Minus AI\u2019: A look at the intersection of geopolitics and autonomy"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#website","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","name":"Defense News","description":"Covering the politics, business and technology of defense | Defense News","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization","name":"Defense News","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/defensenews-logo-white.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/defensenews-logo-white.png","caption":"Defense News"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/person\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1","name":"migration","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=gcf4cb6ee0ec29e49e7a963234e4340ec","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"migration"},"url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/author\/migration\/"}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"distributor_meta":false,"distributor_terms":false,"distributor_media":false,"distributor_original_site_name":"Defense News","distributor_original_site_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews","push-errors":false,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/34_c4isrnet_book.jpg.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25316","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25316"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25316\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":25319,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25316\/revisions\/25319"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25316"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25316"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25316"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=25316"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}