{"id":32622,"date":"2015-10-06T17:31:11","date_gmt":"2015-10-06T17:31:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/uncategorized\/2015\/10\/06\/kendall-most-egregious-parts-of-acquisition-reform-removed\/"},"modified":"2026-08-07T22:48:26","modified_gmt":"2026-08-07T22:48:26","slug":"kendall-most-egregious-parts-of-acquisition-reform-removed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/pentagon\/2015\/10\/06\/kendall-most-egregious-parts-of-acquisition-reform-removed\/","title":{"rendered":"Kendall: &#8216;Most Egregious&#8217; Parts of Acquisition Reform Removed"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">WASHINGTON \u2014 After months of concerns from the Pentagon about acquisition reform language in the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), the Pentagon&#8217;s top weapons buyer said today that the &#8220;most egregious&#8221; parts of the language were removed in conference between the Senate and House.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Frank Kendall, undersecretary for acquisitions, technology and logistics (AT&#038;L), did not spell out exactly what the &#8220;most egregious&#8221; parts were. But the Pentagon has been warning for months that the language drafted by Senate Armed Services Committee\u00a0Chairman Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., would strip Kendall&#8217;s office of oversight authorities that are crucial for preventing cost overruns and failed programs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;We&#8217;re going to assess the impact&#8221; of the final language, Kendall told an audience at an event hosted by DefenseOne. &#8220;But it gives the department and the <span class=\"rte rte-comment\">S<\/span>secretary of Defense a fair amount of latitude.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n<p>Staff from the House and Senate committees sorted through more than 120 acquisition policy provisions before putting out the final conference report. Analysts agree the final report borrowed more heavily from McCain&#8217;s language <span class=\"rte rte-comment\">over<\/span>\u00a0than that of his House counterpart, Rep. Mac Thornberry, R-Texas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Kendall also said <span class=\"rte rte-comment\">that <\/span>the reform language was unlikely to <span class=\"rte rte-comment\">impact <\/span>affect staff size or the Defense Acquisition Board structure, but <span class=\"rte rte-comment\">did<\/span> noted <span class=\"rte rte-comment\">that <\/span>the rules don&#8217;t go into effect until fiscal 2017 \u2014 which gives the lawyers plenty of time to sort through the language and fully understand its impact.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>One provision Kendall <span class=\"rte rte-comment\">called out as <\/span>said was\u00a0&#8220;interesting&#8221; calls for a fiscal penalty against any service which undergoes a Nunn-McCurdy breach, where cost overruns on a program go higher than 15 percent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Under the language in the NDAA, the services would pay a penalty of 3 percent on the overrun, which would then be funneled into a fund controlled by AT&#038;L for prototyping of new technologies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Kendall again warned that the department is still understanding how that would work, noting <span class=\"rte rte-comment\">that <\/span>&#8220;it&#8217;s not obvious to us as to how you remove that money,&#8221; as it would be transferring funds from one part of the budget to another. That may require a congressionally approved reprograming effort<span class=\"rte rte-comment\"> to do<\/span>, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;We&#8217;ve looked at the current situation with this with all the programs we have now, and it turned out two of the services wouldn&#8217;t have any problem at all based on past performance, and one service would have about a $20 million penalty,&#8221; Kendall said. &#8220;That&#8217;s sort of the practical implications of it. I understand the intent behind it. I&#8217;m just not as sure as a practical matter that it&#8217;s going to be all that effective.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Asked about Kendall&#8217;s comments, McCain did not seem concerned with the logistics.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;I&#8217;m glad to look at what recommendations he has.\u00a0But for the first time, there&#8217;s a penalty,&#8221; McCain said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Joe Gould in Washington contributed to this story<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Email: <a href=\"mailto:amehta@defensenews.com\">amehta@defensenews.com<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Twitter: <a href=\"http:\/\/Twitter.com\/AaronMehta\">@AaronMehta<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Pentagon&#8217;s top weapons buyer appears satisfied with acquisition reform language from the Hill.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":72374,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-noindex":"","_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-nofollow":"","_yoast_wpseo_canonical":"","_acf":"","_yoast_wpseo_primary_category":0,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","_smg_distribution_targets":[]},"categories":[33,19],"tags":[],"coauthors":[3378],"class_list":["post-32622","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-home","category-pentagon"],"acf":{"subheadline":"","legacy_arc_id":"PJFPU7GXSBBMJNKNV32BRWOT2U","arc_canonical_url":"\/2015\/10\/06\/kendall-most-egregious-parts-of-acquisition-reform-removed\/","remove_feature_photo":false,"is_sponsored":false,"subtype":"","redirect_url":"","disable_inline_ads":false,"native_logo_pretext":"Presented By:"},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.0 (Yoast SEO v28.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Kendall: &#039;Most Egregious&#039; Parts of Acquisition Reform Removed - Defense News<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The Pentagon&#039;s top weapons buyer appears satisfied with acquisition reform language from the Hill.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kendall: &#039;Most Egregious&#039; Parts of Acquisition Reform Removed\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Pentagon&#039;s top weapons buyer appears satisfied with acquisition reform language from the Hill.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/pentagon\/2015\/10\/06\/kendall-most-egregious-parts-of-acquisition-reform-removed\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Defense News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-10-06T17:31:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-08-07T22:48:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Aaron Mehta\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Aaron Mehta\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\n\t    \"@context\": \"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\n\t    \"@graph\": [\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"Article\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/pentagon\\\/2015\\\/10\\\/06\\\/kendall-most-egregious-parts-of-acquisition-reform-removed\\\/#article\",\n\t            \"isPartOf\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/pentagon\\\/2015\\\/10\\\/06\\\/kendall-most-egregious-parts-of-acquisition-reform-removed\\\/\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"author\": {\n\t                \"name\": \"migration\",\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"headline\": \"Kendall: &#8216;Most Egregious&#8217; Parts of Acquisition Reform Removed\",\n\t            \"datePublished\": \"2015-10-06T17:31:11+00:00\",\n\t            \"dateModified\": \"2026-08-07T22:48:26+00:00\",\n\t            \"mainEntityOfPage\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/pentagon\\\/2015\\\/10\\\/06\\\/kendall-most-egregious-parts-of-acquisition-reform-removed\\\/\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"wordCount\": 491,\n\t            \"commentCount\": 0,\n\t            \"publisher\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/pentagon\\\/2015\\\/10\\\/06\\\/kendall-most-egregious-parts-of-acquisition-reform-removed\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"thumbnailUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/635642674603388274-148772930jpg.jpg\",\n\t            \"articleSection\": [\n\t                \"Home\",\n\t                \"Pentagon\"\n\t            ],\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t            \"potentialAction\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"CommentAction\",\n\t                    \"name\": \"Comment\",\n\t                    \"target\": [\n\t                        \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/pentagon\\\/2015\\\/10\\\/06\\\/kendall-most-egregious-parts-of-acquisition-reform-removed\\\/#respond\"\n\t                    ]\n\t                }\n\t            ]\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"WebPage\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/pentagon\\\/2015\\\/10\\\/06\\\/kendall-most-egregious-parts-of-acquisition-reform-removed\\\/\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/pentagon\\\/2015\\\/10\\\/06\\\/kendall-most-egregious-parts-of-acquisition-reform-removed\\\/\",\n\t            \"name\": \"Kendall: 'Most Egregious' Parts of Acquisition Reform Removed - Defense News\",\n\t            \"isPartOf\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#website\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"primaryImageOfPage\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/pentagon\\\/2015\\\/10\\\/06\\\/kendall-most-egregious-parts-of-acquisition-reform-removed\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/pentagon\\\/2015\\\/10\\\/06\\\/kendall-most-egregious-parts-of-acquisition-reform-removed\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"thumbnailUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/635642674603388274-148772930jpg.jpg\",\n\t            \"datePublished\": \"2015-10-06T17:31:11+00:00\",\n\t            \"dateModified\": \"2026-08-07T22:48:26+00:00\",\n\t            \"description\": \"The Pentagon's top weapons buyer appears satisfied with acquisition reform language from the Hill.\",\n\t            \"breadcrumb\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/pentagon\\\/2015\\\/10\\\/06\\\/kendall-most-egregious-parts-of-acquisition-reform-removed\\\/#breadcrumb\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t            \"potentialAction\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ReadAction\",\n\t                    \"target\": [\n\t                        \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/pentagon\\\/2015\\\/10\\\/06\\\/kendall-most-egregious-parts-of-acquisition-reform-removed\\\/\"\n\t                    ]\n\t                }\n\t            ]\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/pentagon\\\/2015\\\/10\\\/06\\\/kendall-most-egregious-parts-of-acquisition-reform-removed\\\/#primaryimage\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/635642674603388274-148772930jpg.jpg\",\n\t            \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/635642674603388274-148772930jpg.jpg\"\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"BreadcrumbList\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/pentagon\\\/2015\\\/10\\\/06\\\/kendall-most-egregious-parts-of-acquisition-reform-removed\\\/#breadcrumb\",\n\t            \"itemListElement\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 1,\n\t                    \"name\": \"Home\",\n\t                    \"item\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t                    \"ad_zone\": \"home\"\n\t                },\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 2,\n\t                    \"name\": \"Home\",\n\t                    \"item\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/home\\\/\",\n\t                    \"ad_zone\": \"home\"\n\t                },\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 3,\n\t                    \"name\": \"Kendall: &#8216;Most Egregious&#8217; Parts of Acquisition Reform Removed\"\n\t                }\n\t            ]\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"WebSite\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#website\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t            \"name\": \"Defense News\",\n\t            \"description\": \"Covering the politics, business and technology of defense | Defense News\",\n\t            \"publisher\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"potentialAction\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"SearchAction\",\n\t                    \"target\": {\n\t                        \"@type\": \"EntryPoint\",\n\t                        \"urlTemplate\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"\n\t                    },\n\t                    \"query-input\": {\n\t                        \"@type\": \"PropertyValueSpecification\",\n\t                        \"valueRequired\": true,\n\t                        \"valueName\": \"search_term_string\"\n\t                    }\n\t                }\n\t            ],\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\"\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\",\n\t            \"name\": \"Defense News\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t            \"logo\": {\n\t                \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t                \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\n\t                \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/defensenews-logo-white.png\",\n\t                \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/defensenews-logo-white.png\",\n\t                \"caption\": \"Defense News\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"\n\t            }\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"Person\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1\",\n\t            \"name\": \"migration\",\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t                \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=gcf4cb6ee0ec29e49e7a963234e4340ec\",\n\t                \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\n\t                \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\n\t                \"caption\": \"migration\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/author\\\/migration\\\/\"\n\t        }\n\t    ]\n\t}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kendall: 'Most Egregious' Parts of Acquisition Reform Removed - Defense News","description":"The Pentagon's top weapons buyer appears satisfied with acquisition reform language from the Hill.","robots":{"index":"noindex","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kendall: 'Most Egregious' Parts of Acquisition Reform Removed","og_description":"The Pentagon's top weapons buyer appears satisfied with acquisition reform language from the Hill.","og_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/pentagon\/2015\/10\/06\/kendall-most-egregious-parts-of-acquisition-reform-removed\/","og_site_name":"Defense News","article_published_time":"2015-10-06T17:31:11+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-08-07T22:48:26+00:00","author":"Aaron Mehta","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Aaron Mehta","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/pentagon\/2015\/10\/06\/kendall-most-egregious-parts-of-acquisition-reform-removed\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/pentagon\/2015\/10\/06\/kendall-most-egregious-parts-of-acquisition-reform-removed\/"},"author":{"name":"migration","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/person\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1"},"headline":"Kendall: &#8216;Most Egregious&#8217; Parts of Acquisition Reform Removed","datePublished":"2015-10-06T17:31:11+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-07T22:48:26+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/pentagon\/2015\/10\/06\/kendall-most-egregious-parts-of-acquisition-reform-removed\/"},"wordCount":491,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/pentagon\/2015\/10\/06\/kendall-most-egregious-parts-of-acquisition-reform-removed\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/635642674603388274-148772930jpg.jpg","articleSection":["Home","Pentagon"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/pentagon\/2015\/10\/06\/kendall-most-egregious-parts-of-acquisition-reform-removed\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/pentagon\/2015\/10\/06\/kendall-most-egregious-parts-of-acquisition-reform-removed\/","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/pentagon\/2015\/10\/06\/kendall-most-egregious-parts-of-acquisition-reform-removed\/","name":"Kendall: 'Most Egregious' Parts of Acquisition Reform Removed - Defense News","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/pentagon\/2015\/10\/06\/kendall-most-egregious-parts-of-acquisition-reform-removed\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/pentagon\/2015\/10\/06\/kendall-most-egregious-parts-of-acquisition-reform-removed\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/635642674603388274-148772930jpg.jpg","datePublished":"2015-10-06T17:31:11+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-07T22:48:26+00:00","description":"The Pentagon's top weapons buyer appears satisfied with acquisition reform language from the Hill.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/pentagon\/2015\/10\/06\/kendall-most-egregious-parts-of-acquisition-reform-removed\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/pentagon\/2015\/10\/06\/kendall-most-egregious-parts-of-acquisition-reform-removed\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/pentagon\/2015\/10\/06\/kendall-most-egregious-parts-of-acquisition-reform-removed\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/635642674603388274-148772930jpg.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/635642674603388274-148772930jpg.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/pentagon\/2015\/10\/06\/kendall-most-egregious-parts-of-acquisition-reform-removed\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","ad_zone":"home"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/home\/","ad_zone":"home"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Kendall: &#8216;Most Egregious&#8217; Parts of Acquisition Reform Removed"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#website","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","name":"Defense News","description":"Covering the politics, business and technology of defense | Defense News","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization","name":"Defense News","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/defensenews-logo-white.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/defensenews-logo-white.png","caption":"Defense News"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/person\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1","name":"migration","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=gcf4cb6ee0ec29e49e7a963234e4340ec","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"migration"},"url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/author\/migration\/"}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"distributor_meta":false,"distributor_terms":false,"distributor_media":false,"distributor_original_site_name":"Defense News","distributor_original_site_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews","push-errors":false,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/635642674603388274-148772930jpg.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32622","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32622"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32622\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":32629,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32622\/revisions\/32629"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/72374"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32622"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=32622"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=32622"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=32622"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}