{"id":33468,"date":"2018-02-21T15:40:54","date_gmt":"2018-02-21T15:40:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/uncategorized\/2018\/02\/21\/out-of-moscow-washington-got-the-basics-of-russian-nuclear-strategy-all-wrong\/"},"modified":"2026-08-07T22:46:02","modified_gmt":"2026-08-07T22:46:02","slug":"out-of-moscow-washington-got-the-basics-of-russian-nuclear-strategy-all-wrong","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/smr\/nuclear-triad\/2018\/02\/21\/out-of-moscow-washington-got-the-basics-of-russian-nuclear-strategy-all-wrong\/","title":{"rendered":"Out of Moscow: Washington got the basics of Russian nuclear strategy all wrong"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

MOSCOW \u2014When it comes to Russia, the Trump administration\u2019s Nuclear Posture Review<\/a> (NPR) pulls no punches. Moscow\u2019s military, specifically its modernized nuclear forces, are featured significantly throughout the report. the attention paid to other potential nuclear adversaries, like China, does not come close to that paid to Russia.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The core of NPR\u2019s proposed footing vis-a-vis Russia rests on an understanding of Russian nuclear doctrine as offensive, rather defensive. Noted is Russia\u2019s monumental advantage in terms of non-strategic nuclear weapons, which the report\u2019s authors believe Moscow would use to escalate a conflict so as to intimidate the U.S. into backing down.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This assessment has been understandably controversial in Moscow, where officials have for years promised the nation\u2019s sweeping nuclear modernization program was entirely defensive in nature. Indeed, former Russian ambassador to the U.S., Sergey Kislyak, reiterated that several times at the recent Munich Security Conference. <\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cWe\u2019ve been trying to listen to the explanations given for that, but to be honest we have not gotten a clear picture,\u201d Kislyak said. \u201cOn top of that we get the sense that our American colleagues are looking at [low-yield] nuclear weapons more as a war fighting weapon than classical deterrence. It certainly creates additional questions.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kislyak\u2019s remarks were little more than a softer version of a statement issued by the Russian Foreign Ministry on Feb. 3, when NPR was first released, which called the report \u201canti-Russian\u201d and denied any strategy to lower the threshold for the first use of nuclear weapons and aggressive strategies. Russia has been actively asserting that Russia\u2019s nuclear doctrine \u201cclearly limits\u201d the use of nuclear weapons to two hypothetical defense scenarios: in response to an attack on Russia or its allies using nuclear or other weapons of mass destruction, or in response to the threat of a conventional attack that could jeopardize existence of the state.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Click here for in-depth coverage of the nuclear triad, and modernized deterrance<\/a><\/b><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The statement continued to rail against the United States for hypocrisy, intent to develop non-strategic nuclear weapons for warfighting, rather than deterrence, and for mischaracterizing Russian doctrine. It concluded with a vague promise \u201cto take into account the new U.S. plans and to take measures to enhance our security.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is probably just a rhetorical jab, common in most Russian statements.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cI don\u2019t expect any radical changes in Russia,\u201d says Pavel Podvig, author of the Russian Forces blog on nuclear issues. \u201cIt is certain that Russia will use this opportunity to justify its new programs, but it really doesn\u2019t need the new NPR to do that. And it already has everything it needs.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
The Russian nuclear submarine Dmitrij Donskoj sails under the Great Belt Bridge between Jyutland and Fun through Danish waters, near Korsor, on July 21, 2017, on it’s way to Saint Petersburg. (Michael Bager\/AFP via Getty Images)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Indeed, while Russia has been investing heavily in nuclear modernization, these efforts have mostly been aimed at retaining existing capabilities or updating them to match modern needs. Much of Russia\u2019s rearmament efforts have been focused rather on expanding conventional capabilities, such as the Kalibr cruise missile.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

By and large, Russian analysts are confused by NPR\u2019s assertion that Russia has adopted a so-called \u201cescalate-to-de escalate\u201d approach to nuclear weapons.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cI don\u2019t think we have lowered our nuclear threshold,\u201d says Vladimir Frolov, a foreign policy analyst in Moscow. \u201cIn fact, we are moving in the opposite direction, investing in long-range non-nuclear deterrence capabilities to give us more options before nuking you. Even then, I doubt Russia sees limited nuclear use in Europe as a viable option.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The only thing about the NPR that truly bothers Moscow, Frolov says, is the lowering of the U.S. threshold for use of nuclear weapons in response to non-nuclear attacks, such as a cyber attack, \u201cwhich is absurd.\u201d Low-yield warheads on existing launch systems also bothers Moscow, because they wouldn\u2019t know what kind of yield was thrown at them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

While these aspects of NPR might bother Moscow, the document\u2019s understanding of Russia may be flawed. According to Podvig, \u201cNPR got the basic Russian strategy wrong.\u201d Rather than early use or escalate to de-escalate, Russia seeks to project uncertainty about its readiness and capabilities as a deterrent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cFrom this point of view, there is not much in NPR that would affect that. Or, indeed, from any point of view,\u201d Podvig said. \u201cWhatever ideas Russia may have about nuclear use, I don\u2019t see how a low-yield Trident warhead would change that.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There is also an underlying assumption in NPR that Russia\u2019s nuclear doctrine is offensive, that it would somehow be used in conjunction with a conventional attack to intimidate the U.S. and its allies into not responding to Russian aggression against another state. This may not be the case, as Russian doctrine explicitly envisions playing the role of defender.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cSome policymakers believe Russia has an offensive nuclear strategy, but there is little to support this since asymmetric escalation when you\u2019re winning conventionally is hardly credible,\u201d says Michael Kofman, an expert on the Russian military at the CNA think tank in Virginia. \u201cRather, Russia has adopted NATO\u2019s former strategy of flexible response, which includes deliberate escalation if losing a conventional conflict.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What this means is that Russia, if attacked, would use nuclear weapons defensively, just as any peer nuclear-armed state would. The idea that a nation could wage a conventional-only war against another nuclear power is, Kofman argues, a strange fantasy that few subscribed to during the Cold War . Russia will use nukes if losing a defensive war to the U.S. It is that simple.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThey want to deter Russia from using nuclear weapons to end a conflict preemptively; this seems to be an answer to a problem that doesn\u2019t exist,\u201d Kofman says. \u201cThey are worried Moscow has contrived some easy-out strategy, with one or a handful of nuclear weapons.While on the contrary there is every indication that Russia has the arsenal for a large-scale, deliberate employment if pressed.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In seeking to match Russia\u2019s vastly larger capabilities in the realm of non-strategic nuclear weapons, NPR also appears to make a big trade: conflict between nuclear powers is deterred by the risk of uncontrolled nuclear escalation. If you invest in strategies for various tiers of limited nuclear escalation, you actually make conventional conflict more likely.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But, ultimately, this is not the biggest problem presented by NPR\u2019s approach to Russia, Kofman argues. Rather, it is that NPR is a \u201ccase study\u201d in how to not signal to adversaries. In Moscow, the document can be seen as evidence that Russia\u2019s investment in non-strategic nuclear weapons has produced the desired result: policymakers and military officials in the West are deeply concerned about the impact such weapons could have.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cIt is hard to read the NPR and not feel that the United States is desperately afraid of nuclear weapons. Why we would wish to communicate this so loudly is a mystery,\u201d Kofman says. \u201cIt suggests their use by Russia would strategically alter the nature of any conflict for Washington, and given that in almost all the cases, stakes for D.C. are likely to be much lower than for Moscow, reinforcing the efficacy of such capabilities will only encourage further Russian investment in dual-capable means of delivery and non-strategic nuclear weapons.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In Moscow, the document can be seen as evidence that Russia\u2019s sabre-rattling has produced the desired result: fear of their might in the West.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":72796,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-noindex":"","_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-nofollow":"","_yoast_wpseo_canonical":"","_acf":"","_yoast_wpseo_primary_category":125,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","_smg_distribution_targets":[]},"categories":[160,46,11,36,125,23,30],"tags":[],"coauthors":[3380],"class_list":["post-33468","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-daily-news-roundup","category-europe","category-global","category-newsletters","category-nuclear-triad","category-space","category-smr"],"acf":{"subheadline":"","legacy_arc_id":"FXMW6ZZUGFAQJK4UTOULSS6FTY","arc_canonical_url":"\/smr\/nuclear-triad\/2018\/02\/21\/out-of-moscow-washington-got-the-basics-of-russian-nuclear-strategy-all-wrong\/","remove_feature_photo":false,"is_sponsored":false,"subtype":"","redirect_url":"","disable_inline_ads":false,"native_logo_pretext":"Presented By:"},"yoast_head":"\nOut of Moscow: Washington got the basics of Russian nuclear strategy all wrong - Defense News<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In Moscow, the document can be seen as evidence that Russia\u2019s sabre-rattling has produced the desired result: fear of their might in the West.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Out of Moscow: Washington got the basics of Russian nuclear strategy all wrong\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In Moscow, the document can be seen as evidence that Russia\u2019s sabre-rattling has produced the desired result: fear of their might in the West.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/smr\/nuclear-triad\/2018\/02\/21\/out-of-moscow-washington-got-the-basics-of-russian-nuclear-strategy-all-wrong\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Defense News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-02-21T15:40:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-08-07T22:46:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Matthew Bodner\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Matthew Bodner\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\n\t \"@context\": \"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\n\t \"@graph\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"Article\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/smr\\\/nuclear-triad\\\/2018\\\/02\\\/21\\\/out-of-moscow-washington-got-the-basics-of-russian-nuclear-strategy-all-wrong\\\/#article\",\n\t \"isPartOf\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/smr\\\/nuclear-triad\\\/2018\\\/02\\\/21\\\/out-of-moscow-washington-got-the-basics-of-russian-nuclear-strategy-all-wrong\\\/\"\n\t },\n\t \"author\": {\n\t \"name\": \"migration\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1\"\n\t },\n\t \"headline\": \"Out of Moscow: Washington got the basics of Russian nuclear strategy all wrong\",\n\t \"datePublished\": \"2018-02-21T15:40:54+00:00\",\n\t \"dateModified\": \"2026-08-07T22:46:02+00:00\",\n\t \"mainEntityOfPage\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/smr\\\/nuclear-triad\\\/2018\\\/02\\\/21\\\/out-of-moscow-washington-got-the-basics-of-russian-nuclear-strategy-all-wrong\\\/\"\n\t },\n\t \"wordCount\": 1245,\n\t \"commentCount\": 0,\n\t \"publisher\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\"\n\t },\n\t \"image\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/smr\\\/nuclear-triad\\\/2018\\\/02\\\/21\\\/out-of-moscow-washington-got-the-basics-of-russian-nuclear-strategy-all-wrong\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t },\n\t \"thumbnailUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/AP18036745939822.jpg.jpg\",\n\t \"articleSection\": [\n\t \"Daily News Roundup\",\n\t \"Europe\",\n\t \"Global\",\n\t \"Newsletters\",\n\t \"Nuclear Triad\",\n\t \"Space\",\n\t \"Special Multimedia Reports\"\n\t ],\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t \"potentialAction\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"CommentAction\",\n\t \"name\": \"Comment\",\n\t \"target\": [\n\t \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/smr\\\/nuclear-triad\\\/2018\\\/02\\\/21\\\/out-of-moscow-washington-got-the-basics-of-russian-nuclear-strategy-all-wrong\\\/#respond\"\n\t ]\n\t }\n\t ]\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"WebPage\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/smr\\\/nuclear-triad\\\/2018\\\/02\\\/21\\\/out-of-moscow-washington-got-the-basics-of-russian-nuclear-strategy-all-wrong\\\/\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/smr\\\/nuclear-triad\\\/2018\\\/02\\\/21\\\/out-of-moscow-washington-got-the-basics-of-russian-nuclear-strategy-all-wrong\\\/\",\n\t \"name\": \"Out of Moscow: Washington got the basics of Russian nuclear strategy all wrong - Defense News\",\n\t \"isPartOf\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#website\"\n\t },\n\t \"primaryImageOfPage\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/smr\\\/nuclear-triad\\\/2018\\\/02\\\/21\\\/out-of-moscow-washington-got-the-basics-of-russian-nuclear-strategy-all-wrong\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t },\n\t \"image\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/smr\\\/nuclear-triad\\\/2018\\\/02\\\/21\\\/out-of-moscow-washington-got-the-basics-of-russian-nuclear-strategy-all-wrong\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t },\n\t \"thumbnailUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/AP18036745939822.jpg.jpg\",\n\t \"datePublished\": \"2018-02-21T15:40:54+00:00\",\n\t \"dateModified\": \"2026-08-07T22:46:02+00:00\",\n\t \"description\": \"In Moscow, the document can be seen as evidence that Russia\u2019s sabre-rattling has produced the desired result: fear of their might in the West.\",\n\t \"breadcrumb\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/smr\\\/nuclear-triad\\\/2018\\\/02\\\/21\\\/out-of-moscow-washington-got-the-basics-of-russian-nuclear-strategy-all-wrong\\\/#breadcrumb\"\n\t },\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t \"potentialAction\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ReadAction\",\n\t \"target\": [\n\t \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/smr\\\/nuclear-triad\\\/2018\\\/02\\\/21\\\/out-of-moscow-washington-got-the-basics-of-russian-nuclear-strategy-all-wrong\\\/\"\n\t ]\n\t }\n\t ]\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/smr\\\/nuclear-triad\\\/2018\\\/02\\\/21\\\/out-of-moscow-washington-got-the-basics-of-russian-nuclear-strategy-all-wrong\\\/#primaryimage\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/AP18036745939822.jpg.jpg\",\n\t \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/AP18036745939822.jpg.jpg\"\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"BreadcrumbList\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/smr\\\/nuclear-triad\\\/2018\\\/02\\\/21\\\/out-of-moscow-washington-got-the-basics-of-russian-nuclear-strategy-all-wrong\\\/#breadcrumb\",\n\t \"itemListElement\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t \"position\": 1,\n\t \"name\": \"Home\",\n\t \"item\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t \"ad_zone\": \"home\"\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t \"position\": 2,\n\t \"name\": \"Special Multimedia Reports\",\n\t \"item\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/smr\\\/\",\n\t \"ad_zone\": \"smr\"\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t \"position\": 3,\n\t \"name\": \"Nuclear Triad\",\n\t \"item\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/smr\\\/nuclear-triad\\\/\",\n\t \"ad_zone\": \"nuclear-triad\"\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t \"position\": 4,\n\t \"name\": \"Out of Moscow: Washington got the basics of Russian nuclear strategy all wrong\"\n\t }\n\t ]\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"WebSite\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#website\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t \"name\": \"Defense News\",\n\t \"description\": \"Covering the politics, business and technology of defense | Defense News\",\n\t \"publisher\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\"\n\t },\n\t \"potentialAction\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"SearchAction\",\n\t \"target\": {\n\t \"@type\": \"EntryPoint\",\n\t \"urlTemplate\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"\n\t },\n\t \"query-input\": {\n\t \"@type\": \"PropertyValueSpecification\",\n\t \"valueRequired\": true,\n\t \"valueName\": \"search_term_string\"\n\t }\n\t }\n\t ],\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\"\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\",\n\t \"name\": \"Defense News\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t \"logo\": {\n\t \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/defensenews-logo-white.png\",\n\t \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/defensenews-logo-white.png\",\n\t \"caption\": \"Defense News\"\n\t },\n\t \"image\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"\n\t }\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"Person\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1\",\n\t \"name\": \"migration\",\n\t \"image\": {\n\t \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=gcf4cb6ee0ec29e49e7a963234e4340ec\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\n\t \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\n\t \"caption\": \"migration\"\n\t },\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/author\\\/migration\\\/\"\n\t }\n\t ]\n\t}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Out of Moscow: Washington got the basics of Russian nuclear strategy all wrong - Defense News","description":"In Moscow, the document can be seen as evidence that Russia\u2019s sabre-rattling has produced the desired result: fear of their might in the West.","robots":{"index":"noindex","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Out of Moscow: Washington got the basics of Russian nuclear strategy all wrong","og_description":"In Moscow, the document can be seen as evidence that Russia\u2019s sabre-rattling has produced the desired result: fear of their might in the West.","og_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/smr\/nuclear-triad\/2018\/02\/21\/out-of-moscow-washington-got-the-basics-of-russian-nuclear-strategy-all-wrong\/","og_site_name":"Defense News","article_published_time":"2018-02-21T15:40:54+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-08-07T22:46:02+00:00","author":"Matthew Bodner","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Matthew Bodner","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/smr\/nuclear-triad\/2018\/02\/21\/out-of-moscow-washington-got-the-basics-of-russian-nuclear-strategy-all-wrong\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/smr\/nuclear-triad\/2018\/02\/21\/out-of-moscow-washington-got-the-basics-of-russian-nuclear-strategy-all-wrong\/"},"author":{"name":"migration","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/person\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1"},"headline":"Out of Moscow: Washington got the basics of Russian nuclear strategy all wrong","datePublished":"2018-02-21T15:40:54+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-07T22:46:02+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/smr\/nuclear-triad\/2018\/02\/21\/out-of-moscow-washington-got-the-basics-of-russian-nuclear-strategy-all-wrong\/"},"wordCount":1245,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/smr\/nuclear-triad\/2018\/02\/21\/out-of-moscow-washington-got-the-basics-of-russian-nuclear-strategy-all-wrong\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/AP18036745939822.jpg.jpg","articleSection":["Daily News Roundup","Europe","Global","Newsletters","Nuclear Triad","Space","Special Multimedia Reports"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/smr\/nuclear-triad\/2018\/02\/21\/out-of-moscow-washington-got-the-basics-of-russian-nuclear-strategy-all-wrong\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/smr\/nuclear-triad\/2018\/02\/21\/out-of-moscow-washington-got-the-basics-of-russian-nuclear-strategy-all-wrong\/","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/smr\/nuclear-triad\/2018\/02\/21\/out-of-moscow-washington-got-the-basics-of-russian-nuclear-strategy-all-wrong\/","name":"Out of Moscow: Washington got the basics of Russian nuclear strategy all wrong - Defense News","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/smr\/nuclear-triad\/2018\/02\/21\/out-of-moscow-washington-got-the-basics-of-russian-nuclear-strategy-all-wrong\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/smr\/nuclear-triad\/2018\/02\/21\/out-of-moscow-washington-got-the-basics-of-russian-nuclear-strategy-all-wrong\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/AP18036745939822.jpg.jpg","datePublished":"2018-02-21T15:40:54+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-07T22:46:02+00:00","description":"In Moscow, the document can be seen as evidence that Russia\u2019s sabre-rattling has produced the desired result: fear of their might in the West.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/smr\/nuclear-triad\/2018\/02\/21\/out-of-moscow-washington-got-the-basics-of-russian-nuclear-strategy-all-wrong\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/smr\/nuclear-triad\/2018\/02\/21\/out-of-moscow-washington-got-the-basics-of-russian-nuclear-strategy-all-wrong\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/smr\/nuclear-triad\/2018\/02\/21\/out-of-moscow-washington-got-the-basics-of-russian-nuclear-strategy-all-wrong\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/AP18036745939822.jpg.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/AP18036745939822.jpg.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/smr\/nuclear-triad\/2018\/02\/21\/out-of-moscow-washington-got-the-basics-of-russian-nuclear-strategy-all-wrong\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","ad_zone":"home"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Special Multimedia Reports","item":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/smr\/","ad_zone":"smr"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Nuclear Triad","item":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/smr\/nuclear-triad\/","ad_zone":"nuclear-triad"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":4,"name":"Out of Moscow: Washington got the basics of Russian nuclear strategy all wrong"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#website","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","name":"Defense News","description":"Covering the politics, business and technology of defense | Defense News","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization","name":"Defense News","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/defensenews-logo-white.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/defensenews-logo-white.png","caption":"Defense News"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/person\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1","name":"migration","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=gcf4cb6ee0ec29e49e7a963234e4340ec","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"migration"},"url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/author\/migration\/"}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"distributor_meta":false,"distributor_terms":false,"distributor_media":false,"distributor_original_site_name":"Defense News","distributor_original_site_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews","push-errors":false,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/AP18036745939822.jpg.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33468","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33468"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33468\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":33478,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33468\/revisions\/33478"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33468"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33468"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33468"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=33468"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}