{"id":36583,"date":"2017-08-17T15:08:12","date_gmt":"2017-08-17T15:08:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/uncategorized\/2017\/08\/17\/us-should-consider-no-fly-zone-for-north-korea-missile-tests-commentary\/"},"modified":"2026-08-07T22:56:40","modified_gmt":"2026-08-07T22:56:40","slug":"us-should-consider-no-fly-zone-for-north-korea-missile-tests-commentary","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/smr\/space-missile-defense\/2017\/08\/17\/us-should-consider-no-fly-zone-for-north-korea-missile-tests-commentary\/","title":{"rendered":"US should consider no-fly zone for North Korea missile tests [Commentary]"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">North Korea\u2019s July 4 and 28 missile tests indicating a potential intercontinental ballistic missile capability have prompted an urgent U.S. debate over a range of response options. However, none of the approaches advocated to date show much promise in achieving the goal of preventing North Korea from acquiring ICBMs without starting a major war.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">More attention should be paid to America\u2019s growing missile defense capability, which, to his credit, U.S. President Donald Trump has said he plans to accelerate. If this capability has developed as significantly as we believe, then the U.S. might already be in a position to expand Defense Secretary Jim Mattis\u2019 pledge to shoot down any North Korean missile headed toward Guam. The U.S. might, if this capability is verified, declare its intention to intercept any further North Korean ICBM flight tests, regardless of trajectory.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The other options under discussion are unlikely to achieve both elements of this goal. Threatening \u201cfire and fury\u201d retaliation might deter a North Korean attack, but it is unlikely to halt further testing. Tougher sanctions to stimulate negotiations should be continued, but North Korea\u2019s past negotiating record makes this option a long shot. And while military preemption could halt North Korea\u2019s nuclear and missile programs, the risk of catastrophic war is unacceptable.<\/p>\n\n\n<aside class=\"smg-interstitial-link smg-interstitial-link--fallback wp-block-smg-interstitial-link\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.defensenews.com\/smr\/space-missile-defense\/\" class=\"smg-interstitial-link__fallback-link\">Defense News&#039; coverage of space and missile defense<\/a><\/aside>\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">By contrast, a new \u201cno fly\u201d policy for&nbsp;ICBM flight tests would be defensive in nature. The U.S. would not be the first to fire a missile. It would only respond to further North Korean ICBM testing \u2014&nbsp;testing that the U.N. Security Council member states, including China, have implored Pyongyang not to continue. Such an \u201cactive denial\u201d policy would protect our vital national security interests by precluding the testing successes North Korea would need to have adequate confidence to operationalize its ICBMs and have confidence in their precision.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">To enable such a new policy, the U.S. should act now to confirm the viability of deploying three new layers of kinetic-kill missile defenses, beyond the 40 or so Ground-based Interceptors, or GBI, already on alert on our West coast.<\/p>\n\n\n\t<aside class=\"smg-interstitial-link wp-block-smg-interstitial-link\">\n\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/digital-show-dailies\/paris-air-show\/2017\/06\/18\/make-a-move-key-steps-to-a-new-nato-air-power-game-plan-commentary\/\" class=\"smg-interstitial-link__inner\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"smg-interstitial-link__media\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"300\" height=\"199\" src=\"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/635868237478710527-5555113569-b0cffc78fb-ojpg.jpg?w=300\" class=\"smg-interstitial-link__image wp-post-image\" alt=\"\" \/>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"smg-interstitial-link__content\">\n\t\t\t\t<span class=\"smg-interstitial-link__kicker\">Related<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t<h3 class=\"smg-interstitial-link__title\">Make a move: Key steps to a new NATO air power game plan [Commentary]<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p class=\"smg-interstitial-link__excerpt\">Russia remains a growing threat to NATO, and the alliance is designing a new air power strategy. To take full advantage of NATO\u2019s overwhelming potential to deliver precise combat power from the air, this new strategy should focus on three long-term tasks.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/a>\n\t<\/aside>\n\t\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The first involves the U.S. Army\u2019s Terminal High Altitude Area Defense, or THAAD, system, which is already deployed in Guam and partially deployed in South Korea. THAAD is designed to intercept short-, medium- and intermediate-range ballistic missiles in their terminal phase, and its success rate in tests against such targets has been very high. The U.S. Missile Defense Agency, or MDA, should assess as soon as possible the ability of THAAD systems stationed in Asia to intercept highly lofted North Korean ICBM flight tests in the terminal phase.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Similarly, MDA should immediately assess the capabilities against such North Korean ICBM flight test profiles of the U.S. Navy\u2019s Standard Missile-3 Block IB, which is currently being deployed in Europe to deal with the Iranian missile threat. The SM-3 IB is an upper-tier system that has significant capabilities against medium- and intermediate-range missiles if properly positioned and cued by radars. Some 240 interceptors have been delivered to the U.S. and Japanese navies. If MDA\u2019s assessment is positive, SM-3 IBs could be deployed when North Korean ICBM tests launches appear imminent in the eastern Sea of Japan (where North Korea\u2019s first three ICBMs have come down), and a permanent Aegis Ashore facility could be constructed on the Japanese mainland. A new and improved SM-3 Block IIA variant, now being co-developed with Japan, will have even more capability against a North Korean first-generation ICBM, and this program\u2019s deployment should be urgently accelerated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A third layer, which would take longer to deploy, could be provided by developing a two-stage variant of the currently operational three-stage GBI. A two-stage GBI variant deployed in the region or on Hawaii would allow intercepts to deal with the range gap between THAAD, SM and the three-stage GBI.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Taken together, these multilayered missile defenses could not, given the wide ocean areas involved, guarantee that North Korea is unable to conduct an ICBM flight test, but they could well be enough to give its leader Kim Jong Un pause before trying. And if he persists, this plan could actually intercept enough tests to effectively impede his current ICBM deployment ambitions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">And while Russia and China would protest vociferously, the U.S. could cite the recent unanimous U.N. Security Council resolution on stiffened sanctions for \u201cmoral authority\u201d in taking this course of action. Privately, they might even be thankful not to have an ICBM-deliverable nuclear capability being deployed in ever-increasing numbers by such an unstable regime along their borders.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><i>Hans Binnendijk&nbsp;<\/i><i>previously&nbsp;<\/i><i>served as director of the Institute for National Strategic Studies. Robert Bell served as the defense Adviser at the U.S. mission to NATO. Both had tours in the U.S. Senate and with the U.S. National Security Council.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A multilayered missile defense setup could well be enough to give North Korea pause before trying to test launch a missile.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":77939,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-noindex":"","_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-nofollow":"","_yoast_wpseo_canonical":"","_acf":"","_yoast_wpseo_primary_category":129,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","_smg_distribution_targets":[]},"categories":[45,66,160,11,36,17,129,30],"tags":[],"coauthors":[2388,4480],"class_list":["post-36583","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-asia-pacific","category-commentary","category-daily-news-roundup","category-global","category-newsletters","category-opinion","category-space-missile-defense","category-smr"],"acf":{"subheadline":"","legacy_arc_id":"CXG5ZA6GEBD6VOKJMA6RJZQIIU","arc_canonical_url":"\/smr\/space-missile-defense\/2017\/08\/17\/us-should-consider-no-fly-zone-for-north-korea-missile-tests-commentary\/","remove_feature_photo":false,"is_sponsored":false,"subtype":"","redirect_url":"","disable_inline_ads":false,"native_logo_pretext":"Presented By:"},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.0 (Yoast SEO v28.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>US should consider no-fly zone for North Korea missile tests [Commentary] - Defense News<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"A multilayered missile defense setup could well be enough to give North Korea pause before trying to test launch a missile.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/smr\/space-missile-defense\/2017\/08\/17\/us-should-consider-no-fly-zone-for-north-korea-missile-tests-commentary\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"US should consider no-fly zone for North Korea missile tests [Commentary]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A multilayered missile defense setup could well be enough to give North Korea pause before trying to test launch a missile.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/smr\/space-missile-defense\/2017\/08\/17\/us-should-consider-no-fly-zone-for-north-korea-missile-tests-commentary\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Defense News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-08-17T15:08:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-08-07T22:56:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Hans Binnendijk, Robert Bell\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Hans Binnendijk, Robert Bell\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\n\t    \"@context\": \"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\n\t    \"@graph\": [\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"Article\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/smr\\\/space-missile-defense\\\/2017\\\/08\\\/17\\\/us-should-consider-no-fly-zone-for-north-korea-missile-tests-commentary\\\/#article\",\n\t            \"isPartOf\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/smr\\\/space-missile-defense\\\/2017\\\/08\\\/17\\\/us-should-consider-no-fly-zone-for-north-korea-missile-tests-commentary\\\/\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"author\": {\n\t                \"name\": \"migration\",\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"headline\": \"US should consider no-fly zone for North Korea missile tests [Commentary]\",\n\t            \"datePublished\": \"2017-08-17T15:08:12+00:00\",\n\t            \"dateModified\": \"2026-08-07T22:56:40+00:00\",\n\t            \"mainEntityOfPage\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/smr\\\/space-missile-defense\\\/2017\\\/08\\\/17\\\/us-should-consider-no-fly-zone-for-north-korea-missile-tests-commentary\\\/\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"wordCount\": 820,\n\t            \"commentCount\": 0,\n\t            \"publisher\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/smr\\\/space-missile-defense\\\/2017\\\/08\\\/17\\\/us-should-consider-no-fly-zone-for-north-korea-missile-tests-commentary\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"thumbnailUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/GettyImages-824113236.jpg.jpg\",\n\t            \"articleSection\": [\n\t                \"Asia Pacific\",\n\t                \"Commentary\",\n\t                \"Daily News Roundup\",\n\t                \"Global\",\n\t                \"Newsletters\",\n\t                \"Opinion\",\n\t                \"Space and Missile Defense\",\n\t                \"Special Multimedia Reports\"\n\t            ],\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t            \"potentialAction\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"CommentAction\",\n\t                    \"name\": \"Comment\",\n\t                    \"target\": [\n\t                        \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/smr\\\/space-missile-defense\\\/2017\\\/08\\\/17\\\/us-should-consider-no-fly-zone-for-north-korea-missile-tests-commentary\\\/#respond\"\n\t                    ]\n\t                }\n\t            ]\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"WebPage\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/smr\\\/space-missile-defense\\\/2017\\\/08\\\/17\\\/us-should-consider-no-fly-zone-for-north-korea-missile-tests-commentary\\\/\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/smr\\\/space-missile-defense\\\/2017\\\/08\\\/17\\\/us-should-consider-no-fly-zone-for-north-korea-missile-tests-commentary\\\/\",\n\t            \"name\": \"US should consider no-fly zone for North Korea missile tests [Commentary] - Defense News\",\n\t            \"isPartOf\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#website\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"primaryImageOfPage\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/smr\\\/space-missile-defense\\\/2017\\\/08\\\/17\\\/us-should-consider-no-fly-zone-for-north-korea-missile-tests-commentary\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/smr\\\/space-missile-defense\\\/2017\\\/08\\\/17\\\/us-should-consider-no-fly-zone-for-north-korea-missile-tests-commentary\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"thumbnailUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/GettyImages-824113236.jpg.jpg\",\n\t            \"datePublished\": \"2017-08-17T15:08:12+00:00\",\n\t            \"dateModified\": \"2026-08-07T22:56:40+00:00\",\n\t            \"description\": \"A multilayered missile defense setup could well be enough to give North Korea pause before trying to test launch a missile.\",\n\t            \"breadcrumb\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/smr\\\/space-missile-defense\\\/2017\\\/08\\\/17\\\/us-should-consider-no-fly-zone-for-north-korea-missile-tests-commentary\\\/#breadcrumb\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t            \"potentialAction\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ReadAction\",\n\t                    \"target\": [\n\t                        \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/smr\\\/space-missile-defense\\\/2017\\\/08\\\/17\\\/us-should-consider-no-fly-zone-for-north-korea-missile-tests-commentary\\\/\"\n\t                    ]\n\t                }\n\t            ]\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/smr\\\/space-missile-defense\\\/2017\\\/08\\\/17\\\/us-should-consider-no-fly-zone-for-north-korea-missile-tests-commentary\\\/#primaryimage\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/GettyImages-824113236.jpg.jpg\",\n\t            \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/GettyImages-824113236.jpg.jpg\"\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"BreadcrumbList\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/smr\\\/space-missile-defense\\\/2017\\\/08\\\/17\\\/us-should-consider-no-fly-zone-for-north-korea-missile-tests-commentary\\\/#breadcrumb\",\n\t            \"itemListElement\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 1,\n\t                    \"name\": \"Home\",\n\t                    \"item\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t                    \"ad_zone\": \"home\"\n\t                },\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 2,\n\t                    \"name\": \"Space and Missile Defense\",\n\t                    \"item\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/smr\\\/space-missile-defense\\\/\",\n\t                    \"ad_zone\": \"space-missile-defense\"\n\t                },\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 3,\n\t                    \"name\": \"US should consider no-fly zone for North Korea missile tests [Commentary]\"\n\t                }\n\t            ]\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"WebSite\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#website\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t            \"name\": \"Defense News\",\n\t            \"description\": \"Covering the politics, business and technology of defense | Defense News\",\n\t            \"publisher\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"potentialAction\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"SearchAction\",\n\t                    \"target\": {\n\t                        \"@type\": \"EntryPoint\",\n\t                        \"urlTemplate\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"\n\t                    },\n\t                    \"query-input\": {\n\t                        \"@type\": \"PropertyValueSpecification\",\n\t                        \"valueRequired\": true,\n\t                        \"valueName\": \"search_term_string\"\n\t                    }\n\t                }\n\t            ],\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\"\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\",\n\t            \"name\": \"Defense News\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t            \"logo\": {\n\t                \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t                \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\n\t                \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/defensenews-logo-white.png\",\n\t                \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/defensenews-logo-white.png\",\n\t                \"caption\": \"Defense News\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"\n\t            }\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"Person\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1\",\n\t            \"name\": \"migration\",\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t                \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=gcf4cb6ee0ec29e49e7a963234e4340ec\",\n\t                \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\n\t                \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\n\t                \"caption\": \"migration\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/author\\\/migration\\\/\"\n\t        }\n\t    ]\n\t}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"US should consider no-fly zone for North Korea missile tests [Commentary] - Defense News","description":"A multilayered missile defense setup could well be enough to give North Korea pause before trying to test launch a missile.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/smr\/space-missile-defense\/2017\/08\/17\/us-should-consider-no-fly-zone-for-north-korea-missile-tests-commentary\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"US should consider no-fly zone for North Korea missile tests [Commentary]","og_description":"A multilayered missile defense setup could well be enough to give North Korea pause before trying to test launch a missile.","og_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/smr\/space-missile-defense\/2017\/08\/17\/us-should-consider-no-fly-zone-for-north-korea-missile-tests-commentary\/","og_site_name":"Defense News","article_published_time":"2017-08-17T15:08:12+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-08-07T22:56:40+00:00","author":"Hans Binnendijk, Robert Bell","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Hans Binnendijk, Robert Bell","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/smr\/space-missile-defense\/2017\/08\/17\/us-should-consider-no-fly-zone-for-north-korea-missile-tests-commentary\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/smr\/space-missile-defense\/2017\/08\/17\/us-should-consider-no-fly-zone-for-north-korea-missile-tests-commentary\/"},"author":{"name":"migration","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/person\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1"},"headline":"US should consider no-fly zone for North Korea missile tests [Commentary]","datePublished":"2017-08-17T15:08:12+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-07T22:56:40+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/smr\/space-missile-defense\/2017\/08\/17\/us-should-consider-no-fly-zone-for-north-korea-missile-tests-commentary\/"},"wordCount":820,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/smr\/space-missile-defense\/2017\/08\/17\/us-should-consider-no-fly-zone-for-north-korea-missile-tests-commentary\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/GettyImages-824113236.jpg.jpg","articleSection":["Asia Pacific","Commentary","Daily News Roundup","Global","Newsletters","Opinion","Space and Missile Defense","Special Multimedia Reports"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/smr\/space-missile-defense\/2017\/08\/17\/us-should-consider-no-fly-zone-for-north-korea-missile-tests-commentary\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/smr\/space-missile-defense\/2017\/08\/17\/us-should-consider-no-fly-zone-for-north-korea-missile-tests-commentary\/","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/smr\/space-missile-defense\/2017\/08\/17\/us-should-consider-no-fly-zone-for-north-korea-missile-tests-commentary\/","name":"US should consider no-fly zone for North Korea missile tests [Commentary] - Defense News","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/smr\/space-missile-defense\/2017\/08\/17\/us-should-consider-no-fly-zone-for-north-korea-missile-tests-commentary\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/smr\/space-missile-defense\/2017\/08\/17\/us-should-consider-no-fly-zone-for-north-korea-missile-tests-commentary\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/GettyImages-824113236.jpg.jpg","datePublished":"2017-08-17T15:08:12+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-07T22:56:40+00:00","description":"A multilayered missile defense setup could well be enough to give North Korea pause before trying to test launch a missile.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/smr\/space-missile-defense\/2017\/08\/17\/us-should-consider-no-fly-zone-for-north-korea-missile-tests-commentary\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/smr\/space-missile-defense\/2017\/08\/17\/us-should-consider-no-fly-zone-for-north-korea-missile-tests-commentary\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/smr\/space-missile-defense\/2017\/08\/17\/us-should-consider-no-fly-zone-for-north-korea-missile-tests-commentary\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/GettyImages-824113236.jpg.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/GettyImages-824113236.jpg.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/smr\/space-missile-defense\/2017\/08\/17\/us-should-consider-no-fly-zone-for-north-korea-missile-tests-commentary\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","ad_zone":"home"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Space and Missile Defense","item":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/smr\/space-missile-defense\/","ad_zone":"space-missile-defense"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"US should consider no-fly zone for North Korea missile tests [Commentary]"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#website","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","name":"Defense News","description":"Covering the politics, business and technology of defense | Defense News","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization","name":"Defense News","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/defensenews-logo-white.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/defensenews-logo-white.png","caption":"Defense News"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/person\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1","name":"migration","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=gcf4cb6ee0ec29e49e7a963234e4340ec","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"migration"},"url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/author\/migration\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/GettyImages-824113236.jpg.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"distributor_meta":false,"distributor_terms":false,"distributor_media":false,"distributor_original_site_name":"Defense News","distributor_original_site_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews","push-errors":false,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36583","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=36583"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36583\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":75742,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36583\/revisions\/75742"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=36583"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=36583"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=36583"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=36583"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}