{"id":41150,"date":"2016-09-08T11:01:47","date_gmt":"2016-09-08T11:01:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/uncategorized\/2016\/09\/08\/further-dismantling-deterrence-next-stops-on-a-dangerous-road\/"},"modified":"2026-08-07T23:23:21","modified_gmt":"2026-08-07T23:23:21","slug":"further-dismantling-deterrence-next-stops-on-a-dangerous-road","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/commentary\/2016\/09\/08\/further-dismantling-deterrence-next-stops-on-a-dangerous-road\/","title":{"rendered":"Further Dismantling Deterrence: Next Stops on a Dangerous Road"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In the waning months of his presidency, after having taken several steps to weaken our own nuclear deterrent over the past eight years, US President Barack Obama is signaling interest in continuing the misguided, effectively unilateral nuclear disarmament agenda he first articulated in Prague in 2009, as he considers declaring a &#8220;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/opinions\/global-opinions\/allies-unite-to-block-an-obama-legacy\/2016\/08\/14\/cdb8d8e4-60b9-11e6-8e45-477372e89d78_story.html?utm_term=.ef56847c79da\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Link: https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/opinions\/global-opinions\/allies-unite-to-block-an-obama-legacy\/2016\/08\/14\/cdb8d8e4-60b9-11e6-8e45-477372e89d78_story.html?utm_term=.ef56847c79da\">no-first-use<\/a>&#8221; policy for the United States on nuclear weapons, and by possibly <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/news\/josh-rogin\/wp\/2016\/08\/04\/obama-will-bypass-congress-seek-u-n-resolution-on-nuclear-testing\/\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Link: https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/news\/josh-rogin\/wp\/2016\/08\/04\/obama-will-bypass-congress-seek-u-n-resolution-on-nuclear-testing\/\">circumventing<\/a> the Senate by seeking some form of United Nations Security Council action to give legal effect to the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty&#8217;s (CTBT) ban on nuclear testing.\u00a0These maneuvers would have serious implications for international security, and in the case of the CTBT, for American rule of law as well.\u00a0 <br\/><br\/> The Iran nuclear deal has put Iran on a more solid path than ever before toward achieving a nuclear weapon capability.\u00a0Middle Eastern nations like <a href=\"http:\/\/www.reuters.com\/article\/saudi-russia-nuclear-idUSL5N0Z516320150619\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Link: http:\/\/www.reuters.com\/article\/saudi-russia-nuclear-idUSL5N0Z516320150619\">Saudi Arabia<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.reuters.com\/article\/us-nuclear-russia-egypt-idUSKCN0T81YY20151119\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Link: http:\/\/www.reuters.com\/article\/us-nuclear-russia-egypt-idUSKCN0T81YY20151119\">Egypt<\/a> have signed deals to develop civilian nuclear energy, and there is good <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wsj.com\/articles\/saudi-arabia-considers-nuclear-weapons-to-offset-iran-1430999409\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Link: http:\/\/www.wsj.com\/articles\/saudi-arabia-considers-nuclear-weapons-to-offset-iran-1430999409\">reason<\/a> to believe that such nations will use these programs as stepping stones to develop a weapon to offset an eventually nuclear Iran.\u00a0North Korea <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtontimes.com\/news\/2016\/aug\/22\/north-korea-nuclear-tests-show-need-for-sanctions-\/\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Link: http:\/\/www.washingtontimes.com\/news\/2016\/aug\/22\/north-korea-nuclear-tests-show-need-for-sanctions-\/\">conducted<\/a> its fourth announced nuclear test this past January.\u00a0Meanwhile, already-nuclear capable Russia, with its record of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtontimes.com\/news\/2016\/jan\/27\/keith-payne-russias-provocative-nuclear-strategy\/\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Link: http:\/\/www.washingtontimes.com\/news\/2016\/jan\/27\/keith-payne-russias-provocative-nuclear-strategy\/\">contemplating<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.independent.co.uk\/news\/world\/europe\/russia-threatens-denmark-with-nuclear-weapons-if-it-tries-to-join-nato-defence-shield-10125529.html\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Link: http:\/\/www.independent.co.uk\/news\/world\/europe\/russia-threatens-denmark-with-nuclear-weapons-if-it-tries-to-join-nato-defence-shield-10125529.html\">nuclear<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rt.com\/news\/321434-us-missile-shield-putin\/\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Link: https:\/\/www.rt.com\/news\/321434-us-missile-shield-putin\/\">strikes<\/a> on its neighbors and harassing US military assets in international <a href=\"http:\/\/www.militarytimes.com\/story\/military\/2016\/04\/13\/russian-su-24-attack-aircraft-us-navy-destroyer-donald-cook-baltic-sea\/82979184\/\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Link: http:\/\/www.militarytimes.com\/story\/military\/2016\/04\/13\/russian-su-24-attack-aircraft-us-navy-destroyer-donald-cook-baltic-sea\/82979184\/\">waters<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/observer.com\/2016\/05\/kremlin-provocations-and-war-games-risk-real-war\/\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Link: http:\/\/observer.com\/2016\/05\/kremlin-provocations-and-war-games-risk-real-war\/\">airspace<\/a>, has accelerated a program of nuclear modernization that U.S. Strategic Command has <a href=\"http:\/\/freebeacon.com\/national-security\/russia-doubling-nuclear-warheads\/\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Link: http:\/\/freebeacon.com\/national-security\/russia-doubling-nuclear-warheads\/\">described<\/a> as a &#8220;crescendo of activity over the last decade and a half.&#8221;<br\/><br\/> This is the environment in which Obama is now considering exacerbating the decline of our nuclear deterrent, and by extension the global nuclear proliferation outlook, should he follow through with his latest contemplated policy shifts.<br\/><br\/> For decades, the United States has retained the option to use nuclear weapons in response to a devastating non-nuclear attack and in response to devastating chemical or biological weapons attacks, in what has been the actualization of the concept of &#8220;deterrence.&#8221;\u00a0While it has not stopped all wars, our nuclear deterrent has been instrumental in preventing another outbreak of large-scale global conflict since World War II.\u00a0The bad guys have thus far calculated that it&#8217;s better not to launch non-nuclear weapons-of-mass-destruction attacks or debilitating cyberattacks on us or our allies, since we are willing to answer them with the most devastating weapon on earth.<br\/><br\/> Declaration of a &#8220;no-first-use&#8221; policy, whereby the United States commits to using nuclear weapons only if attacked first with nuclear weapons, would stand this calculus on its head, to the detriment of international stability.\u00a0If our adversaries believe that we will not retaliate with nuclear weapons for catastrophic chemical or biological attacks on us or our allies, then the risk that goes with carrying out such attacks goes down, and the risk that our allies will develop their own nuclear weapons, rather than rely on our extended deterrence, goes up.\u00a0In fact, the idea of announcing a &#8220;no-first-use&#8221; policy is so misbegotten that not only are several US allies expressing concern, but even members of Obama&#8217;s own <i>Cabinet <\/i>are strongly\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.wsj.com\/articles\/no-first-use-nuclear-policyproposal-assailed-by-u-s-cabinet-officials-allies-1471042014\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Link: http:\/\/www.wsj.com\/articles\/no-first-use-nuclear-policyproposal-assailed-by-u-s-cabinet-officials-allies-1471042014\">advising<\/a>\u00a0against it. <br\/><br\/> As damaging as a &#8220;no-first-use&#8221; declaration would be, as a statement of White House policy, it is at least something that could be reversed, relatively painlessly, by a new administration.\u00a0The same cannot be said for going through the UN Security Council to try to commit the United States to something that the Senate, exercising its constitutional authority, has already turned down.<br\/><br\/> The United States signed the CTBT in 1996, but has yet to ratify it.\u00a0In 1999, proponents of the CTBT failed to get even a simple majority in the Senate to vote in favor of ratification (let alone the two-thirds\u00a0majority that the constitution requires for ratification of treaties).\u00a0The substantial <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtontimes.com\/news\/2012\/mar\/23\/peace-through-nuclear-strength\/\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Link: http:\/\/www.washingtontimes.com\/news\/2012\/mar\/23\/peace-through-nuclear-strength\/\">flaws<\/a> surrounding the treaty that doomed it before the Senate in 1999\u00a0\u2014\u00a0its failure to define a nuclear test, and its lack of verifiability, among others\u00a0\u2014\u00a0are still\u00a0present.\u00a0<br\/><br\/> Given these defects and recent history, Obama can see as well as anyone that the outlook for Senate ratification of the CTBT is dim. That reality, and the fact that the window is closing for Obama to further his &#8220;Prague agenda&#8221; as president, has prompted him to go around the Senate and seek the assistance of the UN Security Council to bind the United States, in some form, to a moratorium on nuclear testing.<br\/><br\/> An Aug. 12\u00a0letter to the president from Tennessee Republican Sen. Bob Corker, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, seems to shed light on the administration&#8217;s specific intentions in this regard, and appropriately raises concerns. Corker&#8217;s letter <a href=\"http:\/\/www.corker.senate.gov\/public\/index.cfm\/news-list?ID=8F56CDDB-AE5F-418D-8106-C9D9DBAF28CD\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"Link: http:\/\/www.corker.senate.gov\/public\/index.cfm\/news-list?ID=8F56CDDB-AE5F-418D-8106-C9D9DBAF28CD\">states<\/a> in part:<br\/><br\/>&#8220;A recent State Department letter explains that the administration will support ratification of the CTBT through a resolution in the U.N. Security Council and a &#8216;political statement expressing the view that a nuclear test would defeat the object and purpose of the CTBT&#8217; that will be referenced in the U.N. resolution. A political statement invoking the &#8216;object and purpose&#8217; language could trigger a limitation on the ability of future administrations to conduct nuclear weapons tests. &#8216;Object and purpose&#8217; obligations for countries that have signed and not ratified a treaty are specifically articulated in Article 18 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, which the United States also has not ratified; but they have been recognized by successive U.S. administrations as customary international law that present a binding restriction on the United States.&#8221;<br\/><br\/>Corker is correct in his assessment, which is what would make this course of action so damaging. Even in the conduct of foreign policy, for which the Constitution generally tips the balance in favor of the presidency, Obama remains obligated to respect the constitutional prerogatives of the coequal branches of the United States government. In the case of the CTBT, the Senate exercised such a prerogative when it voted against ratification in 1999. Ignoring that outcome in order to bind the United States to the obligations of an international treaty by other means would represent a serious affront to the Senate&#8217;s constitutional role in undertaking international legal obligations, and create a worrisome precedent.\u00a0 <br\/><br\/> We are entering a period in which the world is getting more dangerous, not less.\u00a0 Dismantling our nuclear deterrent in the face of that reality\u00a0\u2014\u00a0whether directly through our own actions or by enabling others to do it for\u00a0us, at the expense of our own democratic process\u00a0\u2014\u00a0would be a major strategic error. <br\/><br\/> <i>Ben Lerner is a vice president with the Center for Security Policy.\u00a0This article is adapted from a forthcoming white paper that will soon be available at the think tank&#8217;s website.<\/i><br\/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ben Lerner, of the Center for Security Policy, says if US adversaries believe that the United States will not retaliate with nuclear weapons for catastrophic chemical or biological attacks on it or its allies, then the risk that goes with carrying out such attacks goes down.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":44067,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-noindex":"","_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-nofollow":"","_yoast_wpseo_canonical":"","_acf":"","_yoast_wpseo_primary_category":66,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","_smg_distribution_targets":[]},"categories":[7,44,66,8,11,124,17,19,30,48],"tags":[],"coauthors":[1161,1662],"class_list":["post-41150","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-air","category-budget","category-commentary","category-congress","category-global","category-nuclear-arsenal","category-opinion","category-pentagon","category-smr","category-the-americas"],"acf":{"subheadline":"","legacy_arc_id":"3X743P3PMNB57KGBZIP5GI2JFU","arc_canonical_url":"\/opinion\/commentary\/2016\/09\/08\/further-dismantling-deterrence-next-stops-on-a-dangerous-road\/","remove_feature_photo":false,"is_sponsored":false,"subtype":"","redirect_url":"","disable_inline_ads":false,"native_logo_pretext":"Presented By:"},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.0 (Yoast SEO v28.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Further Dismantling Deterrence: Next Stops on a Dangerous Road - Defense News<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Ben Lerner, of the Center for Security Policy, says if US adversaries believe that the United States will not retaliate with nuclear weapons for catastrophic chemical or biological attacks on it or its allies, then the risk that goes with carrying out such attacks goes down.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Further Dismantling Deterrence: Next Stops on a Dangerous Road\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Ben Lerner, of the Center for Security Policy, says if US adversaries believe that the United States will not retaliate with nuclear weapons for catastrophic chemical or biological attacks on it or its allies, then the risk that goes with carrying out such attacks goes down.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/commentary\/2016\/09\/08\/further-dismantling-deterrence-next-stops-on-a-dangerous-road\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Defense News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-09-08T11:01:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-08-07T23:23:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ben Lerner, Center for Security Policy, Center For Security Policy\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ben Lerner, Center for Security Policy, Center For Security Policy\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\n\t    \"@context\": \"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\n\t    \"@graph\": [\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"Article\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/commentary\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/08\\\/further-dismantling-deterrence-next-stops-on-a-dangerous-road\\\/#article\",\n\t            \"isPartOf\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/commentary\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/08\\\/further-dismantling-deterrence-next-stops-on-a-dangerous-road\\\/\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"author\": {\n\t                \"name\": \"migration\",\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"headline\": \"Further Dismantling Deterrence: Next Stops on a Dangerous Road\",\n\t            \"datePublished\": \"2016-09-08T11:01:47+00:00\",\n\t            \"dateModified\": \"2026-08-07T23:23:21+00:00\",\n\t            \"mainEntityOfPage\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/commentary\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/08\\\/further-dismantling-deterrence-next-stops-on-a-dangerous-road\\\/\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"wordCount\": 1102,\n\t            \"commentCount\": 0,\n\t            \"publisher\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/commentary\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/08\\\/further-dismantling-deterrence-next-stops-on-a-dangerous-road\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"thumbnailUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/yemenconflict.jpg.jpg\",\n\t            \"articleSection\": [\n\t                \"Air Warfare\",\n\t                \"Budget\",\n\t                \"Commentary\",\n\t                \"Congress\",\n\t                \"Global\",\n\t                \"Nuclear Arsenal\",\n\t                \"Opinion\",\n\t                \"Pentagon\",\n\t                \"Special Multimedia Reports\",\n\t                \"The Americas\"\n\t            ],\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t            \"potentialAction\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"CommentAction\",\n\t                    \"name\": \"Comment\",\n\t                    \"target\": [\n\t                        \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/commentary\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/08\\\/further-dismantling-deterrence-next-stops-on-a-dangerous-road\\\/#respond\"\n\t                    ]\n\t                }\n\t            ]\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"WebPage\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/commentary\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/08\\\/further-dismantling-deterrence-next-stops-on-a-dangerous-road\\\/\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/commentary\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/08\\\/further-dismantling-deterrence-next-stops-on-a-dangerous-road\\\/\",\n\t            \"name\": \"Further Dismantling Deterrence: Next Stops on a Dangerous Road - Defense News\",\n\t            \"isPartOf\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#website\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"primaryImageOfPage\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/commentary\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/08\\\/further-dismantling-deterrence-next-stops-on-a-dangerous-road\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/commentary\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/08\\\/further-dismantling-deterrence-next-stops-on-a-dangerous-road\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"thumbnailUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/yemenconflict.jpg.jpg\",\n\t            \"datePublished\": \"2016-09-08T11:01:47+00:00\",\n\t            \"dateModified\": \"2026-08-07T23:23:21+00:00\",\n\t            \"description\": \"Ben Lerner, of the Center for Security Policy, says if US adversaries believe that the United States will not retaliate with nuclear weapons for catastrophic chemical or biological attacks on it or its allies, then the risk that goes with carrying out such attacks goes down.\",\n\t            \"breadcrumb\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/commentary\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/08\\\/further-dismantling-deterrence-next-stops-on-a-dangerous-road\\\/#breadcrumb\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t            \"potentialAction\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ReadAction\",\n\t                    \"target\": [\n\t                        \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/commentary\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/08\\\/further-dismantling-deterrence-next-stops-on-a-dangerous-road\\\/\"\n\t                    ]\n\t                }\n\t            ]\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/commentary\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/08\\\/further-dismantling-deterrence-next-stops-on-a-dangerous-road\\\/#primaryimage\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/yemenconflict.jpg.jpg\",\n\t            \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/yemenconflict.jpg.jpg\"\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"BreadcrumbList\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/commentary\\\/2016\\\/09\\\/08\\\/further-dismantling-deterrence-next-stops-on-a-dangerous-road\\\/#breadcrumb\",\n\t            \"itemListElement\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 1,\n\t                    \"name\": \"Home\",\n\t                    \"item\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t                    \"ad_zone\": \"home\"\n\t                },\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 2,\n\t                    \"name\": \"Commentary\",\n\t                    \"item\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/commentary\\\/\",\n\t                    \"ad_zone\": \"commentary\"\n\t                },\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 3,\n\t                    \"name\": \"Further Dismantling Deterrence: Next Stops on a Dangerous Road\"\n\t                }\n\t            ]\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"WebSite\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#website\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t            \"name\": \"Defense News\",\n\t            \"description\": \"Covering the politics, business and technology of defense | Defense News\",\n\t            \"publisher\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"potentialAction\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"SearchAction\",\n\t                    \"target\": {\n\t                        \"@type\": \"EntryPoint\",\n\t                        \"urlTemplate\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"\n\t                    },\n\t                    \"query-input\": {\n\t                        \"@type\": \"PropertyValueSpecification\",\n\t                        \"valueRequired\": true,\n\t                        \"valueName\": \"search_term_string\"\n\t                    }\n\t                }\n\t            ],\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\"\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\",\n\t            \"name\": \"Defense News\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t            \"logo\": {\n\t                \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t                \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\n\t                \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/defensenews-logo-white.png\",\n\t                \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/defensenews-logo-white.png\",\n\t                \"caption\": \"Defense News\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"\n\t            }\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"Person\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1\",\n\t            \"name\": \"migration\",\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t                \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=gcf4cb6ee0ec29e49e7a963234e4340ec\",\n\t                \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\n\t                \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\n\t                \"caption\": \"migration\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/author\\\/migration\\\/\"\n\t        }\n\t    ]\n\t}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Further Dismantling Deterrence: Next Stops on a Dangerous Road - Defense News","description":"Ben Lerner, of the Center for Security Policy, says if US adversaries believe that the United States will not retaliate with nuclear weapons for catastrophic chemical or biological attacks on it or its allies, then the risk that goes with carrying out such attacks goes down.","robots":{"index":"noindex","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Further Dismantling Deterrence: Next Stops on a Dangerous Road","og_description":"Ben Lerner, of the Center for Security Policy, says if US adversaries believe that the United States will not retaliate with nuclear weapons for catastrophic chemical or biological attacks on it or its allies, then the risk that goes with carrying out such attacks goes down.","og_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/commentary\/2016\/09\/08\/further-dismantling-deterrence-next-stops-on-a-dangerous-road\/","og_site_name":"Defense News","article_published_time":"2016-09-08T11:01:47+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-08-07T23:23:21+00:00","author":"Ben Lerner, Center for Security Policy, Center For Security Policy","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ben Lerner, Center for Security Policy, Center For Security Policy","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/commentary\/2016\/09\/08\/further-dismantling-deterrence-next-stops-on-a-dangerous-road\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/commentary\/2016\/09\/08\/further-dismantling-deterrence-next-stops-on-a-dangerous-road\/"},"author":{"name":"migration","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/person\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1"},"headline":"Further Dismantling Deterrence: Next Stops on a Dangerous Road","datePublished":"2016-09-08T11:01:47+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-07T23:23:21+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/commentary\/2016\/09\/08\/further-dismantling-deterrence-next-stops-on-a-dangerous-road\/"},"wordCount":1102,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/commentary\/2016\/09\/08\/further-dismantling-deterrence-next-stops-on-a-dangerous-road\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/yemenconflict.jpg.jpg","articleSection":["Air Warfare","Budget","Commentary","Congress","Global","Nuclear Arsenal","Opinion","Pentagon","Special Multimedia Reports","The Americas"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/commentary\/2016\/09\/08\/further-dismantling-deterrence-next-stops-on-a-dangerous-road\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/commentary\/2016\/09\/08\/further-dismantling-deterrence-next-stops-on-a-dangerous-road\/","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/commentary\/2016\/09\/08\/further-dismantling-deterrence-next-stops-on-a-dangerous-road\/","name":"Further Dismantling Deterrence: Next Stops on a Dangerous Road - Defense News","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/commentary\/2016\/09\/08\/further-dismantling-deterrence-next-stops-on-a-dangerous-road\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/commentary\/2016\/09\/08\/further-dismantling-deterrence-next-stops-on-a-dangerous-road\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/yemenconflict.jpg.jpg","datePublished":"2016-09-08T11:01:47+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-07T23:23:21+00:00","description":"Ben Lerner, of the Center for Security Policy, says if US adversaries believe that the United States will not retaliate with nuclear weapons for catastrophic chemical or biological attacks on it or its allies, then the risk that goes with carrying out such attacks goes down.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/commentary\/2016\/09\/08\/further-dismantling-deterrence-next-stops-on-a-dangerous-road\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/commentary\/2016\/09\/08\/further-dismantling-deterrence-next-stops-on-a-dangerous-road\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/commentary\/2016\/09\/08\/further-dismantling-deterrence-next-stops-on-a-dangerous-road\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/yemenconflict.jpg.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/yemenconflict.jpg.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/commentary\/2016\/09\/08\/further-dismantling-deterrence-next-stops-on-a-dangerous-road\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","ad_zone":"home"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Commentary","item":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/commentary\/","ad_zone":"commentary"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Further Dismantling Deterrence: Next Stops on a Dangerous Road"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#website","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","name":"Defense News","description":"Covering the politics, business and technology of defense | Defense News","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization","name":"Defense News","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/defensenews-logo-white.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/defensenews-logo-white.png","caption":"Defense News"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/person\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1","name":"migration","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=gcf4cb6ee0ec29e49e7a963234e4340ec","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"migration"},"url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/author\/migration\/"}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"distributor_meta":false,"distributor_terms":false,"distributor_media":false,"distributor_original_site_name":"Defense News","distributor_original_site_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews","push-errors":false,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/yemenconflict.jpg.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41150","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=41150"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41150\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":41159,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41150\/revisions\/41159"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=41150"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=41150"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=41150"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=41150"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}