{"id":42219,"date":"2015-09-12T20:20:42","date_gmt":"2015-09-12T20:20:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/uncategorized\/2015\/09\/12\/militarized-smartphones-vs-radio-based-technology\/"},"modified":"2026-08-07T23:15:21","modified_gmt":"2026-08-07T23:15:21","slug":"militarized-smartphones-vs-radio-based-technology","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/home\/2015\/09\/12\/militarized-smartphones-vs-radio-based-technology\/","title":{"rendered":"Militarized Smartphones vs. Radio-based Technology"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">VICTORIA, British Columbia \u2014 General Dynamics is hoping to convince the Canadian Army that fielding a portable secure Internet system along with battlefield smartphones holds the key to providing communications and navigation systems for its soldiers in the future.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In July, Rheinmetall won the contract for the initial phase of the Canadian Army\u2019s Integrated Soldier System Project (ISSP). The contract is valued at CAN\u00a0$7 million (US $5 million) for the acquisition of a small number of systems but the project could eventually be worth <span class=\"rte rte-comment\">(CAN)<\/span> $250 million if the Army <span class=\"rte rte-comment\">proceeds with<\/span>\u00a0buys <span class=\"rte rte-comment\">purchasing<\/span> large numbers of such equipment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ISSP is to improve situational awareness and communications on the battlefield. Stephane Oehrli, a vice\u00a0president at Rheinmetall Canada, told <span class=\"rte rte-comment\">explained to<\/span> journalists at a July 28 news conference\u00a0that the basic element of the system is a military radio<span class=\"rte rte-comment\">, but that it is<\/span> integrated with mapping, tracking and GPS<span class=\"rte rte-comment\">lobal Positioning System<\/span> capabilities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">But General Dynamics Mission Systems-Canada of Ottawa believes the capabilities offered by the initial phase of ISSP are already redundant and that the Army should embrace militarized smartphones and a deployable Internet network to support lighter weight and more capable future soldier systems.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;Our strategy is to show the Army that we are beyond today what the [ISSP] project hopes to [be] doing [in] the future,&#8221; said Rick Fawcett, director of business development for GD<span class=\"rte rte-comment\">eneral Dynamics<\/span> Mission Systems-Canada.\u00a0&#8220;We demonstrated the capability of sending a message off a smartphone into the Canadian Army\u2019s existing command-and-control system. That capability doesn\u2019t exist in the first phase of ISSP.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The concept is designed to get away from military radio-based technology and instead use militarized civilian smartphone technology, he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Canadian Defence Minister Jason Kenney said the military would begin testing in the coming months the systems provided by Rheinmetall, starting with a few dozen to ensure they meet all the requirements for ISSP.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Rheinmetall officials noted that once the <span class=\"rte rte-comment\">Canadian <\/span>government declares its ISSP product fully acceptable in 2016, it could exercise options under the contract to buy up to 4,144 of the systems, as well as award a second contract for related support. The total value of both contracts would be around <span class=\"rte rte-comment\">(CAN)<\/span> $250 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Rheinmetall didn\u2019t comment on the views put forward by GD<span class=\"rte rte-comment\">eneral Dynamics<\/span> Mission Systems-Canada.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But Pierre-Alain Bujold, a spokesman for Public Works Canada, which oversees the procurement of military equipment, noted that beyond the initial contracts for ISSP there will <span class=\"rte rte-comment\">also<\/span> be additional competitions to acquire other related equipment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;Canada will use competitive processes to procure items that will enhance the capability and to keep\u00a0up with technological developments,&#8221; he stated in an email.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Fawcett noted that the initial phase of ISSP would provide the Canadian Army with some short-term capability it needs. &#8220;What we&#8217;re looking at is the Army&#8217;s follow-on program,&#8221; he said. &#8220;We&#8217;re looking at the next generation of tactical communications.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>GD<span class=\"rte rte-comment\">eneral Dynamics<\/span> Mission Systems-Canada decided against bidding on the first phase of ISSP, Fawcett said. Instead it directed <span class=\"rte rte-comment\">put<\/span> the <span class=\"rte rte-comment\">(CAN)<\/span> $1 million that would have been spent to compile a bid <span class=\"rte rte-comment\">and directed that<\/span> into further research on<span class=\"rte rte-comment\">into<\/span> what it is calling its Tactical LTE (for \u00a0Long-Term Evolution, the transmission of high-speed data to mobile devices)\u00a0system. <span class=\"rte rte-comment\">(LTE is an abbreviation for Long-Term Evolution, the transmission of high-speed data to mobile devices)<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Fawcett said the firm will now focus on developing a portable military cell network that can be set up in remote areas and on improving how smart phones can interface with older Army radio technology still in use. General Dynamics will also improve security protocols to prevent militarized smartphones from being jammed by enemy forces.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Fawcett said the use of such technology would not totally eliminate the need for military radios, but <span class=\"rte rte-comment\">. But he noted<\/span> it would provide a less expensive, lighter and easier to use system, adding that most soldiers have their own cell or smartphones.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>GD<span class=\"rte rte-comment\">eneral Dynamics<\/span> Mission Systems\u2013Canada <span class=\"rte rte-comment\">has <\/span>already provided its tactical LTE technology for Colt Canada\u2019s Sniper Weapon &amp; Observer Reconnaissance Devices (SWORD) system. SWORD integrates weapon-mounted surveillance and targeting devices with ruggedized smartphone-like technology.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Colt <span class=\"rte rte-comment\">has <\/span>also linked a small <span class=\"rte rte-comment\">unmanned aerial vehicle<\/span>UAV to its weapons, again part of SWORD. That allows soldiers with smartphones to not only view what <span class=\"rte rte-comment\">each<\/span> others are seeing on the battlefield but also what the cameras on the pilotless aircraft are monitoring.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Colt Canada\u2019s technology also includes a <span class=\"rte rte-comment\">global positioning system<\/span>GPS and navigation capability, so the rifle\u2019s geographic position and pointing angles are known and communicated to various other soldiers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;They needed a communications means to do that and traditional radios weren&#8217;t going to work,&#8221; Fawcett said. &#8220;So we proposed a LTE solution.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Colt Canada already has attracted interest in its system, selling several to the US\u00a0Marines, said<span class=\"rte rte-comment\">noted<\/span> Warren Downing, Colt Canada\u2019s director of advanced systems.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Fawcett thinks the Canadian government and Army can be convinced to embrace the new technology once they see what it is capable of.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Email: <a href=\"mailto:dpugliese@defensenews.com\">dpugliese@defensenews.com<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>VICTORIA, British Columbia &#8211; General Dynamics is hoping to convince the Canadian Army that fielding a portable secure internet system along with battlefield smart phones holds the key to providing communications and navigation systems for its soldier<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":83454,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-noindex":"","_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-nofollow":"","_yoast_wpseo_canonical":"","_acf":"","_yoast_wpseo_primary_category":33,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","_smg_distribution_targets":[]},"categories":[33],"tags":[],"coauthors":[3445],"class_list":["post-42219","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-home"],"acf":{"subheadline":"","legacy_arc_id":"HH32R6QFUZCJHDY3PX5OH6EBHY","arc_canonical_url":"\/home\/2015\/09\/12\/militarized-smartphones-vs-radio-based-technology\/","remove_feature_photo":false,"is_sponsored":false,"subtype":"","redirect_url":"","disable_inline_ads":false,"native_logo_pretext":"Presented By:"},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.0 (Yoast SEO v28.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Militarized Smartphones vs. Radio-based Technology - Defense News<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"VICTORIA, British Columbia - General Dynamics is hoping to convince the Canadian Army that fielding a portable secure internet system along with battlefield smart phones holds the key to providing communications and navigation systems for its soldier\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Militarized Smartphones vs. Radio-based Technology\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"VICTORIA, British Columbia - General Dynamics is hoping to convince the Canadian Army that fielding a portable secure internet system along with battlefield smart phones holds the key to providing communications and navigation systems for its soldier\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/home\/2015\/09\/12\/militarized-smartphones-vs-radio-based-technology\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Defense News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-09-12T20:20:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-08-07T23:15:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"David Pugliese\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"David Pugliese\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\n\t    \"@context\": \"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\n\t    \"@graph\": [\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"Article\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/home\\\/2015\\\/09\\\/12\\\/militarized-smartphones-vs-radio-based-technology\\\/#article\",\n\t            \"isPartOf\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/home\\\/2015\\\/09\\\/12\\\/militarized-smartphones-vs-radio-based-technology\\\/\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"author\": {\n\t                \"name\": \"migration\",\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"headline\": \"Militarized Smartphones vs. Radio-based Technology\",\n\t            \"datePublished\": \"2015-09-12T20:20:42+00:00\",\n\t            \"dateModified\": \"2026-08-07T23:15:21+00:00\",\n\t            \"mainEntityOfPage\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/home\\\/2015\\\/09\\\/12\\\/militarized-smartphones-vs-radio-based-technology\\\/\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"wordCount\": 836,\n\t            \"commentCount\": 0,\n\t            \"publisher\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/home\\\/2015\\\/09\\\/12\\\/militarized-smartphones-vs-radio-based-technology\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"thumbnailUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/635775039014401403-gd-mil-smartphone-pugliesejpg.jpg\",\n\t            \"articleSection\": [\n\t                \"Home\"\n\t            ],\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t            \"potentialAction\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"CommentAction\",\n\t                    \"name\": \"Comment\",\n\t                    \"target\": [\n\t                        \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/home\\\/2015\\\/09\\\/12\\\/militarized-smartphones-vs-radio-based-technology\\\/#respond\"\n\t                    ]\n\t                }\n\t            ]\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"WebPage\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/home\\\/2015\\\/09\\\/12\\\/militarized-smartphones-vs-radio-based-technology\\\/\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/home\\\/2015\\\/09\\\/12\\\/militarized-smartphones-vs-radio-based-technology\\\/\",\n\t            \"name\": \"Militarized Smartphones vs. Radio-based Technology - Defense News\",\n\t            \"isPartOf\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#website\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"primaryImageOfPage\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/home\\\/2015\\\/09\\\/12\\\/militarized-smartphones-vs-radio-based-technology\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/home\\\/2015\\\/09\\\/12\\\/militarized-smartphones-vs-radio-based-technology\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"thumbnailUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/635775039014401403-gd-mil-smartphone-pugliesejpg.jpg\",\n\t            \"datePublished\": \"2015-09-12T20:20:42+00:00\",\n\t            \"dateModified\": \"2026-08-07T23:15:21+00:00\",\n\t            \"description\": \"VICTORIA, British Columbia - General Dynamics is hoping to convince the Canadian Army that fielding a portable secure internet system along with battlefield smart phones holds the key to providing communications and navigation systems for its soldier\",\n\t            \"breadcrumb\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/home\\\/2015\\\/09\\\/12\\\/militarized-smartphones-vs-radio-based-technology\\\/#breadcrumb\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t            \"potentialAction\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ReadAction\",\n\t                    \"target\": [\n\t                        \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/home\\\/2015\\\/09\\\/12\\\/militarized-smartphones-vs-radio-based-technology\\\/\"\n\t                    ]\n\t                }\n\t            ]\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/home\\\/2015\\\/09\\\/12\\\/militarized-smartphones-vs-radio-based-technology\\\/#primaryimage\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/635775039014401403-gd-mil-smartphone-pugliesejpg.jpg\",\n\t            \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/635775039014401403-gd-mil-smartphone-pugliesejpg.jpg\"\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"BreadcrumbList\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/home\\\/2015\\\/09\\\/12\\\/militarized-smartphones-vs-radio-based-technology\\\/#breadcrumb\",\n\t            \"itemListElement\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 1,\n\t                    \"name\": \"Home\",\n\t                    \"item\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t                    \"ad_zone\": \"home\"\n\t                },\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 2,\n\t                    \"name\": \"Home\",\n\t                    \"item\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/home\\\/\",\n\t                    \"ad_zone\": \"home\"\n\t                },\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 3,\n\t                    \"name\": \"Militarized Smartphones vs. Radio-based Technology\"\n\t                }\n\t            ]\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"WebSite\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#website\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t            \"name\": \"Defense News\",\n\t            \"description\": \"Covering the politics, business and technology of defense | Defense News\",\n\t            \"publisher\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"potentialAction\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"SearchAction\",\n\t                    \"target\": {\n\t                        \"@type\": \"EntryPoint\",\n\t                        \"urlTemplate\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"\n\t                    },\n\t                    \"query-input\": {\n\t                        \"@type\": \"PropertyValueSpecification\",\n\t                        \"valueRequired\": true,\n\t                        \"valueName\": \"search_term_string\"\n\t                    }\n\t                }\n\t            ],\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\"\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\",\n\t            \"name\": \"Defense News\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t            \"logo\": {\n\t                \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t                \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\n\t                \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/defensenews-logo-white.png\",\n\t                \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/defensenews-logo-white.png\",\n\t                \"caption\": \"Defense News\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"\n\t            }\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"Person\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1\",\n\t            \"name\": \"migration\",\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t                \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=gcf4cb6ee0ec29e49e7a963234e4340ec\",\n\t                \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\n\t                \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\n\t                \"caption\": \"migration\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/author\\\/migration\\\/\"\n\t        }\n\t    ]\n\t}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Militarized Smartphones vs. Radio-based Technology - Defense News","description":"VICTORIA, British Columbia - General Dynamics is hoping to convince the Canadian Army that fielding a portable secure internet system along with battlefield smart phones holds the key to providing communications and navigation systems for its soldier","robots":{"index":"noindex","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Militarized Smartphones vs. Radio-based Technology","og_description":"VICTORIA, British Columbia - General Dynamics is hoping to convince the Canadian Army that fielding a portable secure internet system along with battlefield smart phones holds the key to providing communications and navigation systems for its soldier","og_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/home\/2015\/09\/12\/militarized-smartphones-vs-radio-based-technology\/","og_site_name":"Defense News","article_published_time":"2015-09-12T20:20:42+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-08-07T23:15:21+00:00","author":"David Pugliese","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"David Pugliese","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/home\/2015\/09\/12\/militarized-smartphones-vs-radio-based-technology\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/home\/2015\/09\/12\/militarized-smartphones-vs-radio-based-technology\/"},"author":{"name":"migration","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/person\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1"},"headline":"Militarized Smartphones vs. Radio-based Technology","datePublished":"2015-09-12T20:20:42+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-07T23:15:21+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/home\/2015\/09\/12\/militarized-smartphones-vs-radio-based-technology\/"},"wordCount":836,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/home\/2015\/09\/12\/militarized-smartphones-vs-radio-based-technology\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/635775039014401403-gd-mil-smartphone-pugliesejpg.jpg","articleSection":["Home"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/home\/2015\/09\/12\/militarized-smartphones-vs-radio-based-technology\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/home\/2015\/09\/12\/militarized-smartphones-vs-radio-based-technology\/","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/home\/2015\/09\/12\/militarized-smartphones-vs-radio-based-technology\/","name":"Militarized Smartphones vs. Radio-based Technology - Defense News","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/home\/2015\/09\/12\/militarized-smartphones-vs-radio-based-technology\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/home\/2015\/09\/12\/militarized-smartphones-vs-radio-based-technology\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/635775039014401403-gd-mil-smartphone-pugliesejpg.jpg","datePublished":"2015-09-12T20:20:42+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-07T23:15:21+00:00","description":"VICTORIA, British Columbia - General Dynamics is hoping to convince the Canadian Army that fielding a portable secure internet system along with battlefield smart phones holds the key to providing communications and navigation systems for its soldier","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/home\/2015\/09\/12\/militarized-smartphones-vs-radio-based-technology\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/home\/2015\/09\/12\/militarized-smartphones-vs-radio-based-technology\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/home\/2015\/09\/12\/militarized-smartphones-vs-radio-based-technology\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/635775039014401403-gd-mil-smartphone-pugliesejpg.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/635775039014401403-gd-mil-smartphone-pugliesejpg.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/home\/2015\/09\/12\/militarized-smartphones-vs-radio-based-technology\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","ad_zone":"home"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/home\/","ad_zone":"home"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Militarized Smartphones vs. Radio-based Technology"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#website","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","name":"Defense News","description":"Covering the politics, business and technology of defense | Defense News","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization","name":"Defense News","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/defensenews-logo-white.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/defensenews-logo-white.png","caption":"Defense News"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/person\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1","name":"migration","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=gcf4cb6ee0ec29e49e7a963234e4340ec","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"migration"},"url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/author\/migration\/"}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"distributor_meta":false,"distributor_terms":false,"distributor_media":false,"distributor_original_site_name":"Defense News","distributor_original_site_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews","push-errors":false,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/635775039014401403-gd-mil-smartphone-pugliesejpg.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42219","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=42219"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42219\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":42233,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42219\/revisions\/42233"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=42219"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=42219"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=42219"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=42219"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}