{"id":44475,"date":"2020-05-12T23:01:24","date_gmt":"2020-05-12T23:01:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/uncategorized\/2020\/05\/12\/three-british-nuclear-programs-are-167-billion-over-budget\/"},"modified":"2026-08-07T23:40:26","modified_gmt":"2026-08-07T23:40:26","slug":"three-british-nuclear-programs-are-167-billion-over-budget","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/global\/europe\/2020\/05\/12\/three-british-nuclear-programs-are-167-billion-over-budget\/","title":{"rendered":"Three British nuclear programs are $1.67 billion over budget"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">LONDON \u2014 Critical programs aimed at updating <a href=\"https:\/\/www.defensenews.com\/global\/europe\/2020\/02\/25\/britain-confirms-new-nuclear-warhead-project-after-us-officials-spill-the-beans\/\" target=_blank>Britain\u2019s nuclear weapons infrastructure<\/a> have been hit by long delays and huge cost increases, according to the parliamentary Public Accounts Committee.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Poor management on three nuclear projects involving warhead assembly, core reactor production and submarine building have resulted in combined cost increases of \u00a31.35 billion (U.S. $1.67 billion) as well as delays of between 1.7 and 6.3 years, the committee revealed in a report scheduled for release May 12.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The cost overruns were caused in large part by avoidable mistakes, such as beginning construction work without mature designs, said the committee.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The cost increases and delays cited in the report could be the tip of the iceberg in the nuclear sector. The three programs investigated by the committee represent about a quarter, by initial value, of the 52 nuclear infrastructure programs that the Ministry of Defence is pursuing. A report on nuclear infrastructure late last year by the government\u2019s financial watchdog, the National Audit Office, said the initial value of all the projects was almost \u00a35 billion. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The parliamentary committee said the MoD admitted that costs on the three projects \u201ccould keep rising, as its poor contract design has left the taxpayer to assume financial risk, while doing little to incentivize contractors to improve their performance.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The report said the MoD has poorly managed the three programs, failed to learn from past mistakes and agreed to poorly designed contracts with the major companies that have a stranglehold on Britain\u2019s defense nuclear sector. The contracts did not allow the ministry to share the financial risk with contractors, which meant the government bore the full impact of cost increases, including those of subcontractors. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cTo utterly fail to learn from mistakes over decades, to spectacularly repeat the same mistakes at huge cost to the taxpayer \u2014 and at huge cost to confidence in our defense capabilities \u2014 is completely unacceptable,&#8221; said Member of Parliament Meg Hillier, who chairs the Public Accounts Committee.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;We see too often these same mistakes repeated,\u201d she added. \u201cThe department [MoD] knows it can\u2019t go on like this. It knows it must change and operate differently. The test now is to see how it will do that, and soon.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The MoD said it \u201cimmensely regretted\u201d the impact on the taxpayer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><b>What happened with the three programs?<\/b><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The worst offender in the committee\u2019s report is the MENSA program at the Atomic Weapons Establishment in Burghfield, southern England, where a new nuclear warhead assembly and disassembly facility is under construction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cMENSA had seen a cost increase of \u00a31.07 billion. Some of these cost increases were the result of poor planning decisions and were avoidable. For example, 48% of the total increased costs and nearly \u00a3400 million for MENSA was a result of construction starting before requirements or designs were sufficiently clear, which was time-consuming and costly to subsequently rectify,\u201d the report said. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Atomic Weapons Establishment is run by a Lockheed Martin-led partnership involving Jacobs Engineering as well as Serco under a government-owned, contractor-operated arrangement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The report by the National Audit Office estimated MENSA would be 6.3 years late.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">When asked about how the MENSA program is faring, AWE provided Defense News with its latest in-service completion date of 2023, adding that the work is now &#8220;focused on procuring and fitting out the necessary equipment and seeking regulatory approvals.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The other two programs investigated by the Public Accounts Committee are based at the Rolls-Royce reactor-core production capability facilities at Raynesway, near Derby, England, and at BAE Systems\u2019 submarine-building yard at Barrow.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The cost of the Rolls-Royce facility being built to equip the upcoming Dreadnought-class of nuclear missile submarines with a new reactor design was forecast at \u00a3474 million, with a completion target date of 2026. The National Audit Office found that date to be 5.1 years behind schedule.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The future sub-building facility at BAE Systems\u2019 Barrow location is expected to cost \u00a3240 million, with a completion date of 2022. The new facility is to allow for the modular build of the four Dreadnought-class submarines destined to replace the Royal Navy\u2019s Vanguard boats. The National Audit Office estimated that BAE\u2019s infrastructure project is 1.7 years behind schedule under that completion date.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The watchdog also said in its report that despite earlier challenges, the projects had made progress in later stages. All programs are in their fitting-out stage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A Rolls-Royce spokesperson noted that the creation of a new, nuclear-regulated facility is \u201ca highly complex and intricate project.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cOur existing facilities have been in use since the 1950s, so this really is a once-in-a-generation construction project, and we\u2019re working closely with the MoD to ensure this important facility faces no further delays,\u201d the spokesperson said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A BAE spokesperson said the company had not seen the report and therefore was unable to comment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"670\" height=\"447\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/dreadnought.jpg.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-51678\" srcset=\"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/dreadnought.jpg.jpg 670w, https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/dreadnought.jpg.jpg?resize=300,200 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 670px) 100vw, 670px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><b>How are other nuclear projects getting along?<\/b><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Another troubled AWE program \u2014 Project Pegasus \u2014 was not included in the parliamentary investigation, as construction had not even begun when the MoD paused the project. The ministry put it on hold to further mature the design of the facility to better handle and produce enriched uranium. The \u00a3634 million facility was originally planned to enter service in 2016.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The MoD told the Public Accounts Committee it had learned lessons from other programs, and so paused Pegasus to ensure the design is sufficiently mature and that requirements for a future warhead are clear. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The committee reported that the country\u2019s nuclear efforts account for about 18-19 percent of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.defensenews.com\/global\/europe\/2020\/04\/23\/uk-defense-plans-could-take-major-hit-from-coronavirus-fallout\/\" target=_blank>U.K. defense budget<\/a>, whereas it is only 6-7 percent of the U.S. defense budget.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The MoD told the committee that it had the necessary funding but will negotiate with the Treasury about future funding as part of the upcoming <a href=\"https:\/\/www.defensenews.com\/global\/europe\/2020\/04\/15\/uk-hits-pause-on-defense-review-due-to-coronavirus\/\" target=_blank>governmentwide spending review<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The ministry also said it wants to avoid cuts to the nuclear budget. \u201cThe Department is keen to place some form of ring-fence around the nuclear budget, given its high priority and importance,\u201d the committee report said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In a statement, an MoD spokesperson cited the complexity of nuclear infrastructure projects, but said the ministry continues \u201cto work closely with the regulators and our industry partners.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;Together, we are committed to strengthening the management of nuclear programs, including significant investments in infrastructure to store and update weapons.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A parliamentary committee says the government has admitted that costs on three nuclear projects \u201ccould keep rising, as its poor contract design has left the taxpayer to assume financial risk, while doing little to incentivize contractors to improve their performance.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":84236,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-noindex":"","_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-nofollow":"","_yoast_wpseo_canonical":"","_acf":"","_yoast_wpseo_primary_category":46,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","_smg_distribution_targets":[]},"categories":[160,46,11,36],"tags":[],"coauthors":[3351],"class_list":["post-44475","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-daily-news-roundup","category-europe","category-global","category-newsletters"],"acf":{"subheadline":"","legacy_arc_id":"P5FWDF65Q5DE3LXL265PLETIUI","arc_canonical_url":"\/global\/europe\/2020\/05\/12\/three-british-nuclear-programs-are-167-billion-over-budget\/","remove_feature_photo":false,"is_sponsored":false,"subtype":"","redirect_url":"","disable_inline_ads":false,"native_logo_pretext":"Presented By:"},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.0 (Yoast SEO v28.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Three British nuclear programs are $1.67 billion over budget - Defense News<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"A parliamentary committee says the government has admitted that costs on three nuclear projects \u201ccould keep rising, as its poor contract design has left the taxpayer to assume financial risk, while doing little to incentivize contractors to improve their performance.\u201d\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Three British nuclear programs are $1.67 billion over budget\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A parliamentary committee says the government has admitted that costs on three nuclear projects \u201ccould keep rising, as its poor contract design has left the taxpayer to assume financial risk, while doing little to incentivize contractors to improve their performance.\u201d\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/global\/europe\/2020\/05\/12\/three-british-nuclear-programs-are-167-billion-over-budget\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Defense News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-05-12T23:01:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-08-07T23:40:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Andrew Chuter\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Andrew Chuter\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\n\t    \"@context\": \"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\n\t    \"@graph\": [\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"Article\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/global\\\/europe\\\/2020\\\/05\\\/12\\\/three-british-nuclear-programs-are-167-billion-over-budget\\\/#article\",\n\t            \"isPartOf\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/global\\\/europe\\\/2020\\\/05\\\/12\\\/three-british-nuclear-programs-are-167-billion-over-budget\\\/\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"author\": {\n\t                \"name\": \"migration\",\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"headline\": \"Three British nuclear programs are $1.67 billion over budget\",\n\t            \"datePublished\": \"2020-05-12T23:01:24+00:00\",\n\t            \"dateModified\": \"2026-08-07T23:40:26+00:00\",\n\t            \"mainEntityOfPage\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/global\\\/europe\\\/2020\\\/05\\\/12\\\/three-british-nuclear-programs-are-167-billion-over-budget\\\/\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"wordCount\": 1034,\n\t            \"commentCount\": 0,\n\t            \"publisher\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/global\\\/europe\\\/2020\\\/05\\\/12\\\/three-british-nuclear-programs-are-167-billion-over-budget\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"thumbnailUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/GettyImages-74438380.jpg.jpg\",\n\t            \"articleSection\": [\n\t                \"Daily News Roundup\",\n\t                \"Europe\",\n\t                \"Global\",\n\t                \"Newsletters\"\n\t            ],\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t            \"potentialAction\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"CommentAction\",\n\t                    \"name\": \"Comment\",\n\t                    \"target\": [\n\t                        \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/global\\\/europe\\\/2020\\\/05\\\/12\\\/three-british-nuclear-programs-are-167-billion-over-budget\\\/#respond\"\n\t                    ]\n\t                }\n\t            ]\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"WebPage\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/global\\\/europe\\\/2020\\\/05\\\/12\\\/three-british-nuclear-programs-are-167-billion-over-budget\\\/\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/global\\\/europe\\\/2020\\\/05\\\/12\\\/three-british-nuclear-programs-are-167-billion-over-budget\\\/\",\n\t            \"name\": \"Three British nuclear programs are $1.67 billion over budget - Defense News\",\n\t            \"isPartOf\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#website\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"primaryImageOfPage\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/global\\\/europe\\\/2020\\\/05\\\/12\\\/three-british-nuclear-programs-are-167-billion-over-budget\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/global\\\/europe\\\/2020\\\/05\\\/12\\\/three-british-nuclear-programs-are-167-billion-over-budget\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"thumbnailUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/GettyImages-74438380.jpg.jpg\",\n\t            \"datePublished\": \"2020-05-12T23:01:24+00:00\",\n\t            \"dateModified\": \"2026-08-07T23:40:26+00:00\",\n\t            \"description\": \"A parliamentary committee says the government has admitted that costs on three nuclear projects \u201ccould keep rising, as its poor contract design has left the taxpayer to assume financial risk, while doing little to incentivize contractors to improve their performance.\u201d\",\n\t            \"breadcrumb\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/global\\\/europe\\\/2020\\\/05\\\/12\\\/three-british-nuclear-programs-are-167-billion-over-budget\\\/#breadcrumb\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t            \"potentialAction\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ReadAction\",\n\t                    \"target\": [\n\t                        \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/global\\\/europe\\\/2020\\\/05\\\/12\\\/three-british-nuclear-programs-are-167-billion-over-budget\\\/\"\n\t                    ]\n\t                }\n\t            ]\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/global\\\/europe\\\/2020\\\/05\\\/12\\\/three-british-nuclear-programs-are-167-billion-over-budget\\\/#primaryimage\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/GettyImages-74438380.jpg.jpg\",\n\t            \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/GettyImages-74438380.jpg.jpg\"\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"BreadcrumbList\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/global\\\/europe\\\/2020\\\/05\\\/12\\\/three-british-nuclear-programs-are-167-billion-over-budget\\\/#breadcrumb\",\n\t            \"itemListElement\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 1,\n\t                    \"name\": \"Home\",\n\t                    \"item\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t                    \"ad_zone\": \"home\"\n\t                },\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 2,\n\t                    \"name\": \"Europe\",\n\t                    \"item\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/global\\\/europe\\\/\",\n\t                    \"ad_zone\": \"europe\"\n\t                },\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 3,\n\t                    \"name\": \"Three British nuclear programs are $1.67 billion over budget\"\n\t                }\n\t            ]\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"WebSite\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#website\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t            \"name\": \"Defense News\",\n\t            \"description\": \"Covering the politics, business and technology of defense | Defense News\",\n\t            \"publisher\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"potentialAction\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"SearchAction\",\n\t                    \"target\": {\n\t                        \"@type\": \"EntryPoint\",\n\t                        \"urlTemplate\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"\n\t                    },\n\t                    \"query-input\": {\n\t                        \"@type\": \"PropertyValueSpecification\",\n\t                        \"valueRequired\": true,\n\t                        \"valueName\": \"search_term_string\"\n\t                    }\n\t                }\n\t            ],\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\"\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\",\n\t            \"name\": \"Defense News\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t            \"logo\": {\n\t                \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t                \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\n\t                \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/defensenews-logo-white.png\",\n\t                \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/defensenews-logo-white.png\",\n\t                \"caption\": \"Defense News\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"\n\t            }\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"Person\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1\",\n\t            \"name\": \"migration\",\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t                \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=gcf4cb6ee0ec29e49e7a963234e4340ec\",\n\t                \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\n\t                \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\n\t                \"caption\": \"migration\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/author\\\/migration\\\/\"\n\t        }\n\t    ]\n\t}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Three British nuclear programs are $1.67 billion over budget - Defense News","description":"A parliamentary committee says the government has admitted that costs on three nuclear projects \u201ccould keep rising, as its poor contract design has left the taxpayer to assume financial risk, while doing little to incentivize contractors to improve their performance.\u201d","robots":{"index":"noindex","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Three British nuclear programs are $1.67 billion over budget","og_description":"A parliamentary committee says the government has admitted that costs on three nuclear projects \u201ccould keep rising, as its poor contract design has left the taxpayer to assume financial risk, while doing little to incentivize contractors to improve their performance.\u201d","og_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/global\/europe\/2020\/05\/12\/three-british-nuclear-programs-are-167-billion-over-budget\/","og_site_name":"Defense News","article_published_time":"2020-05-12T23:01:24+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-08-07T23:40:26+00:00","author":"Andrew Chuter","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Andrew Chuter","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/global\/europe\/2020\/05\/12\/three-british-nuclear-programs-are-167-billion-over-budget\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/global\/europe\/2020\/05\/12\/three-british-nuclear-programs-are-167-billion-over-budget\/"},"author":{"name":"migration","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/person\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1"},"headline":"Three British nuclear programs are $1.67 billion over budget","datePublished":"2020-05-12T23:01:24+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-07T23:40:26+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/global\/europe\/2020\/05\/12\/three-british-nuclear-programs-are-167-billion-over-budget\/"},"wordCount":1034,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/global\/europe\/2020\/05\/12\/three-british-nuclear-programs-are-167-billion-over-budget\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/GettyImages-74438380.jpg.jpg","articleSection":["Daily News Roundup","Europe","Global","Newsletters"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/global\/europe\/2020\/05\/12\/three-british-nuclear-programs-are-167-billion-over-budget\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/global\/europe\/2020\/05\/12\/three-british-nuclear-programs-are-167-billion-over-budget\/","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/global\/europe\/2020\/05\/12\/three-british-nuclear-programs-are-167-billion-over-budget\/","name":"Three British nuclear programs are $1.67 billion over budget - Defense News","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/global\/europe\/2020\/05\/12\/three-british-nuclear-programs-are-167-billion-over-budget\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/global\/europe\/2020\/05\/12\/three-british-nuclear-programs-are-167-billion-over-budget\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/GettyImages-74438380.jpg.jpg","datePublished":"2020-05-12T23:01:24+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-07T23:40:26+00:00","description":"A parliamentary committee says the government has admitted that costs on three nuclear projects \u201ccould keep rising, as its poor contract design has left the taxpayer to assume financial risk, while doing little to incentivize contractors to improve their performance.\u201d","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/global\/europe\/2020\/05\/12\/three-british-nuclear-programs-are-167-billion-over-budget\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/global\/europe\/2020\/05\/12\/three-british-nuclear-programs-are-167-billion-over-budget\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/global\/europe\/2020\/05\/12\/three-british-nuclear-programs-are-167-billion-over-budget\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/GettyImages-74438380.jpg.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/GettyImages-74438380.jpg.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/global\/europe\/2020\/05\/12\/three-british-nuclear-programs-are-167-billion-over-budget\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","ad_zone":"home"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Europe","item":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/global\/europe\/","ad_zone":"europe"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Three British nuclear programs are $1.67 billion over budget"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#website","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","name":"Defense News","description":"Covering the politics, business and technology of defense | Defense News","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization","name":"Defense News","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/defensenews-logo-white.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/defensenews-logo-white.png","caption":"Defense News"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/person\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1","name":"migration","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=gcf4cb6ee0ec29e49e7a963234e4340ec","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"migration"},"url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/author\/migration\/"}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"distributor_meta":false,"distributor_terms":false,"distributor_media":false,"distributor_original_site_name":"Defense News","distributor_original_site_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews","push-errors":false,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/GettyImages-74438380.jpg.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44475","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=44475"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44475\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":44482,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44475\/revisions\/44482"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=44475"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=44475"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=44475"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=44475"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}