{"id":48216,"date":"2025-12-30T18:37:33","date_gmt":"2025-12-30T18:37:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/uncategorized\/2025\/12\/30\/lockheed-still-paid-17-billion-despite-f-35s-poor-readiness-rate\/"},"modified":"2026-08-08T17:23:25","modified_gmt":"2026-08-08T17:23:25","slug":"lockheed-still-paid-17-billion-despite-f-35s-poor-readiness-rate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/air\/2025\/12\/30\/lockheed-still-paid-17-billion-despite-f-35s-poor-readiness-rate\/","title":{"rendered":"Lockheed still paid $1.7 billion despite poor readiness rate of F-35s"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Department of Defense did not consistently hold Lockheed Martin accountable for F-35 poor sustainability performance in its 2024 contract, according to a Dec. 19 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dodig.mil\/reports.html\/Article\/4367088\/audit-of-the-dods-oversight-of-contractor-performance-for-the-f-35-joint-strike\/\" rel=\"\">inspector general audit<\/a> of the performance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The F-35 Joint Program Office was found to not have adequately overseen contractor performance on the June 2024 air vehicle sustainment contract, resulting in paying Lockheed Martin $1.7 billion by July 1, 2025, without \u201ceconomic adjustment,\u201d despite a 50% aircraft readiness rate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Although the Full Mission Capable, Mission Capable and Air Vehicle Availability rates did not meet the minimum requirements of the military services, the department still paid more than $1 billion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe average Air Vehicle Availability rate for all F-35 aircraft in FY 2024 was 50 percent, meaning the aircraft were not available to fly half of the time,\u201d an OIG <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dodig.mil\/In-the-Spotlight\/Article\/4367145\/press-release-audit-of-the-dods-oversight-of-contractor-performance-for-the-f-3\/\" rel=\"\">memo<\/a> says.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The audit, conducted by The Department of Defense Office of Inspector General, found that the JPO did not hold Lockheed Martin accountable for \u201cpoor performance\u201d related to F-35 sustainment, even while monitoring the aerospace company\u2019s performance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThis occurred because the F-35 JPO did not include aircraft readiness performance or other measurable contract requirements and did not enforce material inspection and government property reporting requirements in the air vehicle sustainment contract,\u201d the audit says.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The audit also discovered that the JPO did not effectively use contracting officer\u2019s representatives to oversee performance requirements at F-35 aircraft sites.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The JPO is tasked with F-35 production and sustainment contracting and upholding a comprehensive sustainment plan.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter aircraft is the defense department\u2019s largest acquisition program, with an estimated cost of over $2 trillion to buy, operate and sustain the aircraft, through its service life. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">F-35s have a service life of about 8,000 flight hours, but testing of the F-35A variant has shown that it could potentially last up to three service lives, meaning 24,000 flying hours, according to Simple Flying <a href=\"https:\/\/simpleflying.com\/how-f-35-lightning-ii-endure-24000-flight-hours-3-life-cycles\/\" rel=\"\">reporting<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The OIG office made recommendations to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment and the Program Executive Officer for the F-35 JPO to remedy this.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Key recommendations set forth by the office include modifying the contract to incorporate incentive metrics that support the military service performance requirements; orienting the contracting officer\u2019s representative responsibilities to better effectively monitor and report \u201cimpactful evaluation data\u201d on Lockheed Martin\u2019s performance; and evaluate and adjust appropriate staffing levels at all bases where F-35 oversight is required. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe official Performing the Duties of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Sustainment, responding for the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment and the Program Executive Officer for the F-35 JPO, generally agreed with our recommendations,\u201d the audit reads.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Of the seven total recommendations, six are deemed resolved but remain open and one is unresolved, according to the audit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The office requests that the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment provide comments on the unresolved recommendation within 40 days of the final report.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">OIG will close the resolved recommendations when management shows documents that proves they have implemented the agreed-upon actions.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>An audit found that the defense department paid the aerospace company $1.7 billion by July in spite of poor performance.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":110318,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-noindex":"","_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-nofollow":"","_yoast_wpseo_canonical":"","_acf":"","_yoast_wpseo_primary_category":7,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","_smg_distribution_targets":[]},"categories":[7,160,36],"tags":[],"coauthors":[3505],"class_list":["post-48216","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-air","category-daily-news-roundup","category-newsletters"],"acf":{"subheadline":"","legacy_arc_id":"3NOTBM4DKNAK5FA2RI65YY3UGY","arc_canonical_url":"\/news\/your-military\/2025\/12\/30\/lockheed-still-paid-17-billion-despite-f-35s-poor-readiness-rate\/","remove_feature_photo":false,"is_sponsored":false,"subtype":"","redirect_url":"","disable_inline_ads":false,"native_logo_pretext":"Presented By:"},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.0 (Yoast SEO v28.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Lockheed still paid $1.7 billion despite poor readiness rate of F-35s - Defense News<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"An audit found that the defense department paid the aerospace company $1.7 billion by July in spite of poor performance.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/militarytimes\/news\/your-military\/2025\/12\/30\/lockheed-still-paid-17-billion-despite-f-35s-poor-readiness-rate\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Lockheed still paid $1.7 billion despite poor readiness rate of F-35s\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"An audit found that the defense department paid the aerospace company $1.7 billion by July in spite of poor performance.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/air\/2025\/12\/30\/lockheed-still-paid-17-billion-despite-f-35s-poor-readiness-rate\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Defense News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-12-30T18:37:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-08-08T17:23:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Cristina Stassis\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Cristina Stassis\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\n\t    \"@context\": \"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\n\t    \"@graph\": [\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"Article\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/air\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/30\\\/lockheed-still-paid-17-billion-despite-f-35s-poor-readiness-rate\\\/#article\",\n\t            \"isPartOf\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/air\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/30\\\/lockheed-still-paid-17-billion-despite-f-35s-poor-readiness-rate\\\/\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"author\": {\n\t                \"name\": \"migration\",\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"headline\": \"Lockheed still paid $1.7 billion despite poor readiness rate of F-35s\",\n\t            \"datePublished\": \"2025-12-30T18:37:33+00:00\",\n\t            \"dateModified\": \"2026-08-08T17:23:25+00:00\",\n\t            \"mainEntityOfPage\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/air\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/30\\\/lockheed-still-paid-17-billion-despite-f-35s-poor-readiness-rate\\\/\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"wordCount\": 507,\n\t            \"commentCount\": 0,\n\t            \"publisher\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/air\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/30\\\/lockheed-still-paid-17-billion-despite-f-35s-poor-readiness-rate\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"thumbnailUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/8879268.jpg.jpg\",\n\t            \"articleSection\": [\n\t                \"Air Warfare\",\n\t                \"Daily News Roundup\",\n\t                \"Newsletters\"\n\t            ],\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t            \"potentialAction\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"CommentAction\",\n\t                    \"name\": \"Comment\",\n\t                    \"target\": [\n\t                        \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/air\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/30\\\/lockheed-still-paid-17-billion-despite-f-35s-poor-readiness-rate\\\/#respond\"\n\t                    ]\n\t                }\n\t            ]\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"WebPage\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/air\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/30\\\/lockheed-still-paid-17-billion-despite-f-35s-poor-readiness-rate\\\/\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/air\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/30\\\/lockheed-still-paid-17-billion-despite-f-35s-poor-readiness-rate\\\/\",\n\t            \"name\": \"Lockheed still paid $1.7 billion despite poor readiness rate of F-35s - Defense News\",\n\t            \"isPartOf\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#website\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"primaryImageOfPage\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/air\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/30\\\/lockheed-still-paid-17-billion-despite-f-35s-poor-readiness-rate\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/air\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/30\\\/lockheed-still-paid-17-billion-despite-f-35s-poor-readiness-rate\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"thumbnailUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/8879268.jpg.jpg\",\n\t            \"datePublished\": \"2025-12-30T18:37:33+00:00\",\n\t            \"dateModified\": \"2026-08-08T17:23:25+00:00\",\n\t            \"description\": \"An audit found that the defense department paid the aerospace company $1.7 billion by July in spite of poor performance.\",\n\t            \"breadcrumb\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/air\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/30\\\/lockheed-still-paid-17-billion-despite-f-35s-poor-readiness-rate\\\/#breadcrumb\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t            \"potentialAction\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ReadAction\",\n\t                    \"target\": [\n\t                        \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/air\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/30\\\/lockheed-still-paid-17-billion-despite-f-35s-poor-readiness-rate\\\/\"\n\t                    ]\n\t                }\n\t            ]\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/air\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/30\\\/lockheed-still-paid-17-billion-despite-f-35s-poor-readiness-rate\\\/#primaryimage\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/8879268.jpg.jpg\",\n\t            \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/8879268.jpg.jpg\"\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"BreadcrumbList\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/air\\\/2025\\\/12\\\/30\\\/lockheed-still-paid-17-billion-despite-f-35s-poor-readiness-rate\\\/#breadcrumb\",\n\t            \"itemListElement\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 1,\n\t                    \"name\": \"Home\",\n\t                    \"item\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t                    \"ad_zone\": \"home\"\n\t                },\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 2,\n\t                    \"name\": \"Air Warfare\",\n\t                    \"item\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/air\\\/\",\n\t                    \"ad_zone\": \"air\"\n\t                },\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 3,\n\t                    \"name\": \"Lockheed still paid $1.7 billion despite poor readiness rate of F-35s\"\n\t                }\n\t            ]\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"WebSite\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#website\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t            \"name\": \"Defense News\",\n\t            \"description\": \"Covering the politics, business and technology of defense | Defense News\",\n\t            \"publisher\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"potentialAction\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"SearchAction\",\n\t                    \"target\": {\n\t                        \"@type\": \"EntryPoint\",\n\t                        \"urlTemplate\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"\n\t                    },\n\t                    \"query-input\": {\n\t                        \"@type\": \"PropertyValueSpecification\",\n\t                        \"valueRequired\": true,\n\t                        \"valueName\": \"search_term_string\"\n\t                    }\n\t                }\n\t            ],\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\"\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\",\n\t            \"name\": \"Defense News\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t            \"logo\": {\n\t                \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t                \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\n\t                \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/defensenews-logo-white.png\",\n\t                \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/defensenews-logo-white.png\",\n\t                \"caption\": \"Defense News\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"\n\t            }\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"Person\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1\",\n\t            \"name\": \"migration\",\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t                \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=gcf4cb6ee0ec29e49e7a963234e4340ec\",\n\t                \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\n\t                \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\n\t                \"caption\": \"migration\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/author\\\/migration\\\/\"\n\t        }\n\t    ]\n\t}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Lockheed still paid $1.7 billion despite poor readiness rate of F-35s - Defense News","description":"An audit found that the defense department paid the aerospace company $1.7 billion by July in spite of poor performance.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/militarytimes\/news\/your-military\/2025\/12\/30\/lockheed-still-paid-17-billion-despite-f-35s-poor-readiness-rate\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Lockheed still paid $1.7 billion despite poor readiness rate of F-35s","og_description":"An audit found that the defense department paid the aerospace company $1.7 billion by July in spite of poor performance.","og_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/air\/2025\/12\/30\/lockheed-still-paid-17-billion-despite-f-35s-poor-readiness-rate\/","og_site_name":"Defense News","article_published_time":"2025-12-30T18:37:33+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-08-08T17:23:25+00:00","author":"Cristina Stassis","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Cristina Stassis","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/air\/2025\/12\/30\/lockheed-still-paid-17-billion-despite-f-35s-poor-readiness-rate\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/air\/2025\/12\/30\/lockheed-still-paid-17-billion-despite-f-35s-poor-readiness-rate\/"},"author":{"name":"migration","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/person\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1"},"headline":"Lockheed still paid $1.7 billion despite poor readiness rate of F-35s","datePublished":"2025-12-30T18:37:33+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-08T17:23:25+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/air\/2025\/12\/30\/lockheed-still-paid-17-billion-despite-f-35s-poor-readiness-rate\/"},"wordCount":507,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/air\/2025\/12\/30\/lockheed-still-paid-17-billion-despite-f-35s-poor-readiness-rate\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/8879268.jpg.jpg","articleSection":["Air Warfare","Daily News Roundup","Newsletters"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/air\/2025\/12\/30\/lockheed-still-paid-17-billion-despite-f-35s-poor-readiness-rate\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/air\/2025\/12\/30\/lockheed-still-paid-17-billion-despite-f-35s-poor-readiness-rate\/","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/air\/2025\/12\/30\/lockheed-still-paid-17-billion-despite-f-35s-poor-readiness-rate\/","name":"Lockheed still paid $1.7 billion despite poor readiness rate of F-35s - Defense News","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/air\/2025\/12\/30\/lockheed-still-paid-17-billion-despite-f-35s-poor-readiness-rate\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/air\/2025\/12\/30\/lockheed-still-paid-17-billion-despite-f-35s-poor-readiness-rate\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/8879268.jpg.jpg","datePublished":"2025-12-30T18:37:33+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-08T17:23:25+00:00","description":"An audit found that the defense department paid the aerospace company $1.7 billion by July in spite of poor performance.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/air\/2025\/12\/30\/lockheed-still-paid-17-billion-despite-f-35s-poor-readiness-rate\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/air\/2025\/12\/30\/lockheed-still-paid-17-billion-despite-f-35s-poor-readiness-rate\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/air\/2025\/12\/30\/lockheed-still-paid-17-billion-despite-f-35s-poor-readiness-rate\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/8879268.jpg.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/8879268.jpg.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/air\/2025\/12\/30\/lockheed-still-paid-17-billion-despite-f-35s-poor-readiness-rate\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","ad_zone":"home"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Air Warfare","item":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/air\/","ad_zone":"air"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Lockheed still paid $1.7 billion despite poor readiness rate of F-35s"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#website","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","name":"Defense News","description":"Covering the politics, business and technology of defense | Defense News","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization","name":"Defense News","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/defensenews-logo-white.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/defensenews-logo-white.png","caption":"Defense News"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/person\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1","name":"migration","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=gcf4cb6ee0ec29e49e7a963234e4340ec","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"migration"},"url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/author\/migration\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/8879268.jpg.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"distributor_meta":false,"distributor_terms":false,"distributor_media":false,"distributor_original_site_name":"Defense News","distributor_original_site_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews","push-errors":false,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48216","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=48216"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48216\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":48219,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48216\/revisions\/48219"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=48216"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=48216"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=48216"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=48216"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}