{"id":48322,"date":"2026-01-16T20:30:00","date_gmt":"2026-01-16T20:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/uncategorized\/2026\/01\/16\/amid-mixed-reception-china-calls-trump-battleship-an-easier-target\/"},"modified":"2026-08-18T20:53:26","modified_gmt":"2026-08-18T20:53:26","slug":"amid-mixed-reception-china-calls-trump-battleship-an-easier-target","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/pentagon\/2026\/01\/16\/amid-mixed-reception-china-calls-trump-battleship-an-easier-target\/","title":{"rendered":"China calls Trump battleship \u2018easier target\u2019 amid mixed US reception"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

U.S. President Donald Trump calls the vessel a new class of \u201cbattleship\u201d graced by his own name<\/a>, but China just calls the U.S. Navy\u2019s<\/a> latest concept a larger and \u201ceasier target\u201d for its growing array of anti-ship drones and missiles. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

A day after Trump\u2019s Dec. 22 announcement at Mar-a-Lago that he had ordered the construction of a \u201cTrump class\u201d of possibly 20 to 25 battleships<\/a>, China\u2019s Global Times, a state media outlet, carried an interview with naval researcher Zhang Junshe stating that the type of warship envisioned by Trump<\/a> would be a ripe target for China\u2019s anti-ship weapons, including the so-called \u201ccarrier killer\u201d DF-21D ballistic missile. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThe large size of a battleship also makes it more vulnerable and potentially an easier target, particularly when it is densely loaded with munitions,\u201d according to Zhang<\/a>, a researcher at the People\u2019s Liberation Army Naval Military Academic Research Institute. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the wake of the announcement, some analysts suggested the battleship proposal may ultimately not be realistic<\/a> and instead a move by Trump to jolt awake the U.S. shipbuilding industry, which lags far behind China.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cWe must wait and see if it can succeed,\u201d Zhang told the Global Times, a tabloid published under the guidance of \u201cPeople\u2019s Daily,\u201d the official newspaper of the Chinese Communist Party.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump\u2019s battleship plan also appeared to draw a response from Russia. Two days after the Dec. 22 announcement, Nikolai Patrushev, an aide to President Vladimr Putin and head of Russia\u2019s Naval Board, said in a speech that Russia had begun working on a \u201cnext-generation\u201d nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarine, according to Russia\u2019s Interfax news agency. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
YJ-21 hypersonic anti-ship ballistic missiles are seen during a military parade in Beijing, Sept. 3, 2025. (Pedro Pardo\/AFP via Getty Images)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

On Dec. 30, in the wake of the unveiling of the battleship concept, the non-partisan Congressional Research Service<\/a> released a report estimating that the new class of ships would cost as much as $15 billion for the first to put to sea \u2014 already named the USS Defiant \u2014 with each additional ship costing about $10 billion. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

In a statement shortly after Trump put forward the plan, Bath Iron Works President Charles F. Krugh said his shipyard \u201cstands ready to fully support the Navy in the design and construction of this important new shipbuilding program.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Chris Kastner, Huntington Ingalls president and CEO, also issued a statement, saying, \u201cWe are proud to have built the Navy\u2019s most technologically advanced surface combatants and our shipbuilders are committed to continuing that work in lock step with the Navy to expand their Fleet.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The biggest fan of the battleship proposal, meanwhile, might be the service\u2019s Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Daryl Caudle, who said Wednesday at the Surface Navy Association Symposium that he views the battleship as the centerpiece in the formation of a \u201cGolden Fleet\u201d which \u201cwill anchor maritime fires and sea control in the most contested environments, massing durable combat power and absorbing punishment an adversary cannot match.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Caudle also said the Navy has a lot of catching up to do in keeping pace with China, but that will depend on the ability of the shipyards to speed up production. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cIt is not happening at the pace any of us are satisfied with,\u201d Caudle said. \u201cI am pressing hard with [Navy Secretary John Phelan] to accelerate deliveries in 2026 and beyond. I want more hulls in the water, and I want them there faster.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Adm. Daryl Caudle visits an East Coast-based Naval Special Warfare unit, April 2023. (MC1 John Kotara\/U.S. Navy)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Caudle noted that the Navy\u2019s \u201cBattle Force stands at roughly 290 ships, with about 100 deployed worldwide on any given day.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That number stands in contrast to projections contained in the Pentagon\u2019s recently released Annual Report to Congress<\/a> on Military and Security Developments Involving the People\u2019s Republic of China, which estimated the number of surface warships and submarines in service to Beijing to be at 370. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

At the symposium Wednesday, Caudle gave a grim forecast, considering that near-peer fleet, on what the next fight at sea might look like. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cLet me be absolutely clear about that fight,\u201d he said. \u201cIt will be faster, more distributed, more lethal and far less forgiving than anything we have faced in our lifetimes. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThere will be no rear area. There will be no sanctuary. There will be no \u2018time to figure it out later.\u2019 The opening minutes of the next fight will be decisive, and our obligation is to be ready on day one.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Naval officials are hoping the development of the new class will help turn the future tide in America\u2019s favor. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

At the Dec. 22 announcement, Trump lauded the new battleships as being \u201cthe fastest, the biggest and by far, 100 times more powerful.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n

He also claimed the ships would be armed with high-powered laser technology, nuclear-armed sea-launched cruise missiles and hypersonic weapons \u2014 all technologies in various stages of development. The president went on to mention the inclusion of an electromagnetic railgun, which the service said it had ditched in 2021<\/a>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
A high-speed camera captures a full-energy shot by an electromagnetic railgun prototype launcher. (John F. Williams\/U.S. Navy)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Despite the president\u2019s \u201cbiggest\u201d claims, the tentative length of the BBG (X) \u2014 at 840 to 880 feet, with a beam of 105 to 115 feet \u2014 would be close to the measurements of the World War II-era Iowa class battleships. The battleship Missouri, meanwhile, had a displacement when fully loaded of about 58,000 tons, while the Trump class would come in at 35,000 tons-plus. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Considered too costly to maintain and too vulnerable to attack, the four Iowa class battleships \u2014 Iowa, Missouri, Wisconsin and New Jersey \u2014 were retired in the 1990s. Those same factors, analysts say<\/a>, cast doubt over the future of the Trump class iteration. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Beyond the weapons and displacement of the new class, some have noted the artist renderings of the BBG(X) bears a resemblance<\/a> to the \u201carsenal ship\u201d of the 1990s, one that was intended to be a floating platform for up to 500 Tomahawk cruise missiles and other armaments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Congress defunded the arsenal ship program in 1997, citing costs and questions about the survivability of the ships in combat. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Critics of the proposed new battleships said the same concerns that unraveled the arsenal ship will eventually scrap the Trump class program. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

In a Dec. 23 commentary<\/a>, Mark Cancian, a senior defense and security adviser at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, wrote that \u201cthis ship will never sail.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cIt will take years to design, cost $9 billion each to build and contravene the Navy\u2019s new concept of operations, which envisions distributed firepower,\u201d said Cancian, a retired Marine colonel and Vietnam veteran. \u201cA future administration will cancel the program before the first ship hits the water.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A different take came from retired Adm. James Foggo, a submariner and dean of the Center for Maritime Strategy think tank, who said in a Jan. 6 phone interview with Military Times that \u201canytime the [president] shows interest in your service is a good thing. It\u2019s good that [Trump] is behind a program to build more ships.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
President Donald Trump arrives to speak during a celebration for the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Navy aboard the USS Harry S. Truman, Oct. 5, 2025. (Steve Helber\/AP)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

\u201cSo, the good news is the president is behind the initiatives to get shipbuilding going again,\u201d said Foggo, a former commander of U.S. Naval Forces Europe-Africa. \u201cCertainly it\u2019s a high risk because the Chinese have these very capable weapons systems. There\u2019s a risk to anything that that floats on the sea. It\u2019s how you deploy those systems in distributed maritime operations \u2014 don\u2019t concentrate in one area. If the balloon goes up, the dumbest thing you could do is concentrate your forces.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Complicating the pursuit of the new class is the current state of U.S. shipbuilding, which Phelan, in a Jan. 7 interview with Bret Baier of Fox News, called a \u201cmess\u201d and consistently \u201cbehind schedule and over budget.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n

But the battleship program could serve as a catalyst in jump starting a new era of efficient and speedy construction in the yards, he added. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Phelan also expressed confidence that a new administration bent on erasing all things Trump would have a hard time in justifying the cancellation of the program. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cI think they\u2019re going to have to explain why they canceled something that the Navy views as a requirement to protect us, enhance sea lanes and maintain and enhance America\u2019s maritime dominance.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n

In its report on the battleship program, the Congressional Research Service listed several \u201cIssues for Congress\u201d to decide on prior to approving the first two BBG(X) ships in the authorization and appropriations process. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Among them, the CRS report requested that Congress explore what analysis went into the procurement, whether the development would be the most cost-effective course of action and what the acquisition process looked like prior to the program\u2019s initiation. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The report also suggested investigating whether new technologies, such as \u201can electromagnetic railgun and higher-power lasers,\u201d would be ready by the 2030s as options to be incorporated. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Some analysts have suggested the battleship proposal may ultimately not be realistic and instead a move by Trump to jolt awake U.S. shipbuilders. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":110613,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"single-post-featured-layout","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-noindex":"","_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-nofollow":"","_yoast_wpseo_canonical":"","_acf":"","_yoast_wpseo_primary_category":19,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","_smg_distribution_targets":[]},"categories":[45,160,11,16,36,19],"tags":[8590,8591,8592,8594,8593],"coauthors":[7250],"class_list":["post-48322","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-asia-pacific","category-daily-news-roundup","category-global","category-naval","category-newsletters","category-pentagon","tag-asia","tag-asia-brief","tag-china","tag-japan","tag-taiwan"],"acf":{"subheadline":"","legacy_arc_id":"7VICOJ5VZRCITJ4F223VW7OZHI","arc_canonical_url":"\/news\/pentagon-congress\/2026\/01\/16\/amid-mixed-reception-china-calls-trump-battleship-an-easier-target\/","remove_feature_photo":false,"is_sponsored":false,"subtype":"featured-layout","redirect_url":"","disable_inline_ads":false,"native_logo_pretext":"Presented By:"},"yoast_head":"\nChina calls Trump battleship \u2018easier target\u2019 amid mixed US reception - Defense News<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Some analysts have suggested the battleship proposal may ultimately not be realistic and instead a move by Trump to jolt awake U.S. shipbuilders.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"China calls Trump battleship \u2018easier target\u2019 amid mixed US reception\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Some analysts have suggested the battleship proposal may ultimately not be realistic and instead a move by Trump to jolt awake U.S. shipbuilders.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/pentagon\/2026\/01\/16\/amid-mixed-reception-china-calls-trump-battleship-an-easier-target\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Defense News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-01-16T20:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-08-18T20:53:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Richard Sisk\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Richard Sisk\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\n\t \"@context\": \"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\n\t \"@graph\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"Article\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/pentagon\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/16\\\/amid-mixed-reception-china-calls-trump-battleship-an-easier-target\\\/#article\",\n\t \"isPartOf\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/pentagon\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/16\\\/amid-mixed-reception-china-calls-trump-battleship-an-easier-target\\\/\"\n\t },\n\t \"author\": {\n\t \"name\": \"migration\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1\"\n\t },\n\t \"headline\": \"China calls Trump battleship \u2018easier target\u2019 amid mixed US reception\",\n\t \"datePublished\": \"2026-01-16T20:30:00+00:00\",\n\t \"dateModified\": \"2026-08-18T20:53:26+00:00\",\n\t \"mainEntityOfPage\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/pentagon\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/16\\\/amid-mixed-reception-china-calls-trump-battleship-an-easier-target\\\/\"\n\t },\n\t \"wordCount\": 1520,\n\t \"commentCount\": 0,\n\t \"publisher\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\"\n\t },\n\t \"image\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/pentagon\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/16\\\/amid-mixed-reception-china-calls-trump-battleship-an-easier-target\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t },\n\t \"thumbnailUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/GettyImages-2253191070.jpg.jpg\",\n\t \"keywords\": [\n\t \"asia\",\n\t \"asia brief\",\n\t \"china\",\n\t \"japan\",\n\t \"taiwan\"\n\t ],\n\t \"articleSection\": [\n\t \"Asia Pacific\",\n\t \"Daily News Roundup\",\n\t \"Global\",\n\t \"Naval\",\n\t \"Newsletters\",\n\t \"Pentagon\"\n\t ],\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t \"potentialAction\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"CommentAction\",\n\t \"name\": \"Comment\",\n\t \"target\": [\n\t \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/pentagon\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/16\\\/amid-mixed-reception-china-calls-trump-battleship-an-easier-target\\\/#respond\"\n\t ]\n\t }\n\t ]\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"WebPage\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/pentagon\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/16\\\/amid-mixed-reception-china-calls-trump-battleship-an-easier-target\\\/\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/pentagon\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/16\\\/amid-mixed-reception-china-calls-trump-battleship-an-easier-target\\\/\",\n\t \"name\": \"China calls Trump battleship \u2018easier target\u2019 amid mixed US reception - Defense News\",\n\t \"isPartOf\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#website\"\n\t },\n\t \"primaryImageOfPage\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/pentagon\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/16\\\/amid-mixed-reception-china-calls-trump-battleship-an-easier-target\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t },\n\t \"image\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/pentagon\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/16\\\/amid-mixed-reception-china-calls-trump-battleship-an-easier-target\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t },\n\t \"thumbnailUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/GettyImages-2253191070.jpg.jpg\",\n\t \"datePublished\": \"2026-01-16T20:30:00+00:00\",\n\t \"dateModified\": \"2026-08-18T20:53:26+00:00\",\n\t \"description\": \"Some analysts have suggested the battleship proposal may ultimately not be realistic and instead a move by Trump to jolt awake U.S. shipbuilders.\",\n\t \"breadcrumb\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/pentagon\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/16\\\/amid-mixed-reception-china-calls-trump-battleship-an-easier-target\\\/#breadcrumb\"\n\t },\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t \"potentialAction\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ReadAction\",\n\t \"target\": [\n\t \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/pentagon\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/16\\\/amid-mixed-reception-china-calls-trump-battleship-an-easier-target\\\/\"\n\t ]\n\t }\n\t ]\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/pentagon\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/16\\\/amid-mixed-reception-china-calls-trump-battleship-an-easier-target\\\/#primaryimage\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/GettyImages-2253191070.jpg.jpg\",\n\t \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/GettyImages-2253191070.jpg.jpg\"\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"BreadcrumbList\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/pentagon\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/16\\\/amid-mixed-reception-china-calls-trump-battleship-an-easier-target\\\/#breadcrumb\",\n\t \"itemListElement\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t \"position\": 1,\n\t \"name\": \"Home\",\n\t \"item\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t \"ad_zone\": \"home\"\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t \"position\": 2,\n\t \"name\": \"Pentagon\",\n\t \"item\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/pentagon\\\/\",\n\t \"ad_zone\": \"pentagon\"\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t \"position\": 3,\n\t \"name\": \"China calls Trump battleship \u2018easier target\u2019 amid mixed US reception\"\n\t }\n\t ]\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"WebSite\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#website\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t \"name\": \"Defense News\",\n\t \"description\": \"Covering the politics, business and technology of defense | Defense News\",\n\t \"publisher\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\"\n\t },\n\t \"potentialAction\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"SearchAction\",\n\t \"target\": {\n\t \"@type\": \"EntryPoint\",\n\t \"urlTemplate\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"\n\t },\n\t \"query-input\": {\n\t \"@type\": \"PropertyValueSpecification\",\n\t \"valueRequired\": true,\n\t \"valueName\": \"search_term_string\"\n\t }\n\t }\n\t ],\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\"\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\",\n\t \"name\": \"Defense News\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t \"logo\": {\n\t \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/defensenews-logo-white.png\",\n\t \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/defensenews-logo-white.png\",\n\t \"caption\": \"Defense News\"\n\t },\n\t \"image\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"\n\t }\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"Person\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1\",\n\t \"name\": \"migration\",\n\t \"image\": {\n\t \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=gcf4cb6ee0ec29e49e7a963234e4340ec\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\n\t \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\n\t \"caption\": \"migration\"\n\t },\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/author\\\/migration\\\/\"\n\t }\n\t ]\n\t}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"China calls Trump battleship \u2018easier target\u2019 amid mixed US reception - Defense News","description":"Some analysts have suggested the battleship proposal may ultimately not be realistic and instead a move by Trump to jolt awake U.S. shipbuilders.","robots":{"index":"noindex","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"China calls Trump battleship \u2018easier target\u2019 amid mixed US reception","og_description":"Some analysts have suggested the battleship proposal may ultimately not be realistic and instead a move by Trump to jolt awake U.S. shipbuilders.","og_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/pentagon\/2026\/01\/16\/amid-mixed-reception-china-calls-trump-battleship-an-easier-target\/","og_site_name":"Defense News","article_published_time":"2026-01-16T20:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-08-18T20:53:26+00:00","author":"Richard Sisk","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Richard Sisk","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/pentagon\/2026\/01\/16\/amid-mixed-reception-china-calls-trump-battleship-an-easier-target\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/pentagon\/2026\/01\/16\/amid-mixed-reception-china-calls-trump-battleship-an-easier-target\/"},"author":{"name":"migration","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/person\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1"},"headline":"China calls Trump battleship \u2018easier target\u2019 amid mixed US reception","datePublished":"2026-01-16T20:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-18T20:53:26+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/pentagon\/2026\/01\/16\/amid-mixed-reception-china-calls-trump-battleship-an-easier-target\/"},"wordCount":1520,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/pentagon\/2026\/01\/16\/amid-mixed-reception-china-calls-trump-battleship-an-easier-target\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/GettyImages-2253191070.jpg.jpg","keywords":["asia","asia brief","china","japan","taiwan"],"articleSection":["Asia Pacific","Daily News Roundup","Global","Naval","Newsletters","Pentagon"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/pentagon\/2026\/01\/16\/amid-mixed-reception-china-calls-trump-battleship-an-easier-target\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/pentagon\/2026\/01\/16\/amid-mixed-reception-china-calls-trump-battleship-an-easier-target\/","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/pentagon\/2026\/01\/16\/amid-mixed-reception-china-calls-trump-battleship-an-easier-target\/","name":"China calls Trump battleship \u2018easier target\u2019 amid mixed US reception - Defense News","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/pentagon\/2026\/01\/16\/amid-mixed-reception-china-calls-trump-battleship-an-easier-target\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/pentagon\/2026\/01\/16\/amid-mixed-reception-china-calls-trump-battleship-an-easier-target\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/GettyImages-2253191070.jpg.jpg","datePublished":"2026-01-16T20:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-18T20:53:26+00:00","description":"Some analysts have suggested the battleship proposal may ultimately not be realistic and instead a move by Trump to jolt awake U.S. shipbuilders.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/pentagon\/2026\/01\/16\/amid-mixed-reception-china-calls-trump-battleship-an-easier-target\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/pentagon\/2026\/01\/16\/amid-mixed-reception-china-calls-trump-battleship-an-easier-target\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/pentagon\/2026\/01\/16\/amid-mixed-reception-china-calls-trump-battleship-an-easier-target\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/GettyImages-2253191070.jpg.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/GettyImages-2253191070.jpg.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/pentagon\/2026\/01\/16\/amid-mixed-reception-china-calls-trump-battleship-an-easier-target\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","ad_zone":"home"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Pentagon","item":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/pentagon\/","ad_zone":"pentagon"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"China calls Trump battleship \u2018easier target\u2019 amid mixed US reception"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#website","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","name":"Defense News","description":"Covering the politics, business and technology of defense | Defense News","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization","name":"Defense News","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/defensenews-logo-white.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/defensenews-logo-white.png","caption":"Defense News"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/person\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1","name":"migration","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=gcf4cb6ee0ec29e49e7a963234e4340ec","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"migration"},"url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/author\/migration\/"}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"distributor_meta":false,"distributor_terms":false,"distributor_media":false,"distributor_original_site_name":"Defense News","distributor_original_site_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews","push-errors":false,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/GettyImages-2253191070.jpg.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48322","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=48322"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48322\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":48324,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48322\/revisions\/48324"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=48322"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=48322"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=48322"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=48322"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}