{"id":54173,"date":"2021-03-01T19:31:51","date_gmt":"2021-03-01T19:31:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/uncategorized\/2021\/03\/01\/senate-defense-appropriations-chair-talks-nuclear-modernization-defense-cuts-and-earmarks\/"},"modified":"2026-08-07T23:53:18","modified_gmt":"2026-08-07T23:53:18","slug":"senate-defense-appropriations-chair-talks-nuclear-modernization-defense-cuts-and-earmarks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/congress\/2021\/03\/01\/senate-defense-appropriations-chair-talks-nuclear-modernization-defense-cuts-and-earmarks\/","title":{"rendered":"New Senate defense appropriations chairman talks nuclear modernization, defense cuts and earmarks"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

WASHINGTON \u2015 If progressives aim to cut the U.S. Defense Department\u2019s top-line budget<\/a> or the ground-based leg of the nuclear triad, they\u2019re likely see pushback from a fellow Democrat: the incoming chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee\u2019s defense subpanel, Sen. Jon Tester<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an interview with Defense News on Monday, the Montana lawmaker said he\u2019s open to targeted, not across-the-board cuts, and he reiterated his support for modernizing intercontinental ballistic missiles, which are partially based at his state\u2019s Malmstrom Air Force Base \u2015 and support for the \u201cincredible deterrent\u201d that ICBMs provide.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Air Force plans for the Ground Based Strategic Deterrent<\/a> being built by Northrop Grumman to replace the Minuteman III ICBM. But some Democrats and arms control advocates have pushed to cut the program <\/a>amid the Pentagon\u2019s estimate that it will cost $100 billion to build.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cSo we\u2019ll be getting briefings moving forward about the threat and the deterrent levels of those ICBMs,\u201d Tester said. \u201cAs of right now, I think it\u2019s important that we move forward with the GBSD because I believe there\u2019s still an important deterrent.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tester outlined his budget priorities and talked about his emphasis on oversight.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThe bottom line is we can always look for ways to get better bang for the buck, and I do think we need to listen to the military and hold them accountable, just like we need to hold accountable the contractors out there,\u201d he said. \u201cI\u2019m open to making the system work better and more efficiently, but I never want to give up the oversight and the accountability.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What are your priorities as you take over as chairman?<\/b><\/p>\n\n\n\n

My priorities are what any American wants, and that is really to make sure that our defense is adequate to keep this country safe. Oftentimes I get into questions about whether [the next defense budget] is going to be 3 percent or 5 percent more, or 3 percent or 5 percent less. The way I look at the budget is making sure the military gets what it needs, and the military needs what it gets. So I\u2019m going to be doing my best, and it\u2019s a massive budget, but I\u2019m going to do my best to make sure how we\u2019re spending money and the taxpayer is getting the biggest bang for the buck and this country is kept safe.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If I had two personal [priorities], I think we need to continue to focus on research because research is really, really important; and then I would say cyber is going to be really important to any sort of conflict we\u2019re going to be fighting.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

With this year\u2019s budget, the U.S. is dealing with a price tag associated with the response to COVID-19, and that\u2019s going to put pressure on the federal budget. Progressives, including Sen. Bernie Sanders, last year pushed for an across-the-board defense cut, whereas Sen. Jack Reed has talked about reshuffling priorities within the defense budget. And then you have some Republicans who\u2019d like to see a 3-5 percent increase. What\u2019s your feeling on an across-the-board cut?<\/b><\/p>\n\n\n\n

I don\u2019t support across-the-board cuts. I think that\u2019s not what we\u2019re sent here to do. You\u2019re sent here to use your brain, use a little common sense and do what\u2019s best. I am going to be talking to Jack this week about these and other issues. I fall much more toward where you describe Jack Reed, which is: Figure out what your priorities are and fund them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Cyber is one of your priorities; and by research, I take it you\u2019re talking about emerging technologies. What\u2019s impacting your thinking there?<\/b><\/p>\n\n\n\n

I just think [warfare is] going to become more and more advanced and more and more complicated, and we need to try to get ahead of the curve on what our adversaries are doing. If you talk to folks who have been around a while, we\u2019re usually good at fighting the last war, but we don\u2019t really plan very well for for the next one. I hope we don\u2019t have to fight the next one, but I think cyber is going to be a big part of any sort of threats against us \u2015 or potential offensive measures that we might take.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

We hear authorizers talk a lot about tweaking the acquisition process to make it easier for emerging technologies to get into the hands of troops, but last week there was a think tank report about reforming the defense appropriations process and budgeting process, the<\/b> PPBE<\/b><\/a>. What are your thoughts on flexible budgeting for the Pentagon?<\/b><\/p>\n\n\n\n

We need to work with the Pentagon to make sure we give them the flexibility that they need, but we need to have intense oversight \u2015 on all monies, but this is a massive budget \u2015 to make sure that they\u2019re utilizing those dollars in a way that Congress intended. I don\u2019t know anything about the PPBE and that story, and I don\u2019t know what they mean by acquisition reform, but if that means holding accountable the people you\u2019re buying stuff from, then count me in on that too.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The bottom line is we can always look for ways to get a better bang for the buck, and I do think we need to listen to the military and hold them accountable, just like we need to hold accountable the contractors out there. I\u2019m open to making the system work better and more efficiently, but I never want to give up the oversight and the accountability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Senior
Senior Airman Zachariah Abdul-Aziz views his descent for a rappel down an entrance to a launch facility, Aug. 21, 2020, near Malmstrom Air Force Base, Mont. (Senior Airman Daniel Brosam\/Air Force)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

You\u2019re known as a strong support of the ICBM mission, but some of your fellow Democrats argue the ICBM replacement \u2014 the GBSD program \u2014 is too expensive. Instead of a wholesale reduction of that leg of the nuclear triad, would you be in favor of a proposal from arms control advocates to do a service-life extension of the Minuteman III as a compromise?<\/b><\/p>\n\n\n\n

For the 60 of the 64 years I\u2019ve been alive, those ICBMs have been an incredible deterrent, and I firmly believe they\u2019re still an incredible deterrent and we still need to keep them as an incredible deterrent. But I also have never served on any of the committees that give classified briefings on the threat. So we\u2019ll be getting briefings moving forward about the threat and the deterrent levels of those ICBMs. As of right now, I think it\u2019s important that we move forward with the GBSD because I believe there\u2019s still an important deterrent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Arms control advocates think the Minuteman III can have its service life extended, whereas uniformed military officials who are responsible for the nuclear arsenal argue the opposite.<\/b><\/p>\n\n\n\n

What I want to look at is not the extension of the life [of the Minuteman III], but what is the threat and are they still an effective deterrent to the threats that are coming. I was raised during the Cold War, and I know that Russia was much more of a threat in the 1960s. China is becoming more of a concern, let\u2019s just put it that way. What role do [ICBMs] play with China? What role do they play with North Korea? What role do they play with Iran? And the same thing, by the way, with all the other military acquisitions that we\u2019ve made: Are we right-sizing it to where the threats are coming from?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Have you talked with Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin or other defense officials?<\/b><\/p>\n\n\n\n

I\u2019m trying to get around, and I spent this weekend visiting with some of the folks in the Air Force and the Army about what we have and where we\u2019re going. I visited with Secretary Austin on his priorities about 10 days ago now, and we\u2019re going to continue to have those conversations. We\u2019re going to get the budget from the president probably in April, or maybe May, and we\u2019re really going to be having a lot of conversations with them about what\u2019s in that budget and why.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What\u2019s your sense of the timeline? Biden administration officials say they didn\u2019t get full cooperation from the outgoing Trump administration and that that\u2019s caused delays. What does an April or May time frame mean for Congress passing a full federal budget?<\/b><\/p>\n\n\n\n

We need to roll up our sleeves and work harder as a congress to try to get this thing done by the end of July, and by the latest September. This is just a matter of committing ourselves to getting it done. It\u2019s a matter of looking at the budget, asking tough questions, modifying the budget where necessary, putting it up for a vote and moving forward. If in fact they\u2019ve been delayed some, Congress needs to buck it up and get it done before the end of the fiscal year.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

You came into Congress before earmarks were shelved, and now House Democrats are talking about reinstating them, but there\u2019s not an agreement with the Senate. What do you want to see happen around earmarks?<\/b><\/p>\n\n\n\n

If we\u2019re going to reinstate earmarks, it\u2019s got to be done in a bipartisan way, or it shouldn\u2019t be done. Whether they\u2019re limited to nonprofits or to so many earmarks per [lawmaker], all that is less important to me than the fact that I\u2019ve talked to most people on the Appropriations Committee about earmarks. They like them, and they wish they were back. Most importantly, they have to be transparent so people know what the hell they\u2019re voting on and so they can challenge those earmarks on the floor. Would I prefer they go to nonprofits? Probably, but I think I can live with them either way.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If earmarks are revived, is there a benefit to the military because it smooths the way for appropriations packages to pass on time? Getting budget deals has been such a grind.<\/b><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The benefit of earmarks is that they help bring people together so we get stuff passed, and that\u2019s been a challenge since they\u2019ve gone away. If they\u2019re included in a way that is transparent and can be effective, I think it could help with passage of appropriations.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Defense News spoke with Sen. Jon Tester about his priorities as the chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee’s defense subpanel.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":97240,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-noindex":"","_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-nofollow":"","_yoast_wpseo_canonical":"","_acf":"","_yoast_wpseo_primary_category":8,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","_smg_distribution_targets":[]},"categories":[44,8,160,13,36,125,30],"tags":[],"coauthors":[3446],"class_list":["post-54173","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-budget","category-congress","category-daily-news-roundup","category-interviews","category-newsletters","category-nuclear-triad","category-smr"],"acf":{"subheadline":"","legacy_arc_id":"OWI2UWO3MBFVFNRAB6JTJGLZJE","arc_canonical_url":"\/congress\/2021\/03\/01\/senate-defense-appropriations-chair-talks-nuclear-modernization-defense-cuts-and-earmarks\/","remove_feature_photo":false,"is_sponsored":false,"subtype":"","redirect_url":"","disable_inline_ads":false,"native_logo_pretext":"Presented By:"},"yoast_head":"\nNew Senate defense appropriations chairman talks nuclear modernization, defense cuts and earmarks - Defense News<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Defense News spoke with Sen. Jon Tester about his priorities as the chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee's defense subpanel.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"New Senate defense appropriations chairman talks nuclear modernization, defense cuts and earmarks\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Defense News spoke with Sen. Jon Tester about his priorities as the chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee's defense subpanel.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/congress\/2021\/03\/01\/senate-defense-appropriations-chair-talks-nuclear-modernization-defense-cuts-and-earmarks\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Defense News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-03-01T19:31:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-08-07T23:53:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Joe Gould\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Joe Gould\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\n\t \"@context\": \"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\n\t \"@graph\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"Article\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/congress\\\/2021\\\/03\\\/01\\\/senate-defense-appropriations-chair-talks-nuclear-modernization-defense-cuts-and-earmarks\\\/#article\",\n\t \"isPartOf\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/congress\\\/2021\\\/03\\\/01\\\/senate-defense-appropriations-chair-talks-nuclear-modernization-defense-cuts-and-earmarks\\\/\"\n\t },\n\t \"author\": {\n\t \"name\": \"migration\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1\"\n\t },\n\t \"headline\": \"New Senate defense appropriations chairman talks nuclear modernization, defense cuts and earmarks\",\n\t \"datePublished\": \"2021-03-01T19:31:51+00:00\",\n\t \"dateModified\": \"2026-08-07T23:53:18+00:00\",\n\t \"mainEntityOfPage\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/congress\\\/2021\\\/03\\\/01\\\/senate-defense-appropriations-chair-talks-nuclear-modernization-defense-cuts-and-earmarks\\\/\"\n\t },\n\t \"wordCount\": 1766,\n\t \"commentCount\": 0,\n\t \"publisher\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\"\n\t },\n\t \"image\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/congress\\\/2021\\\/03\\\/01\\\/senate-defense-appropriations-chair-talks-nuclear-modernization-defense-cuts-and-earmarks\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t },\n\t \"thumbnailUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/GettyImages-1183636868.jpg.jpg\",\n\t \"articleSection\": [\n\t \"Budget\",\n\t \"Congress\",\n\t \"Daily News Roundup\",\n\t \"Interviews\",\n\t \"Newsletters\",\n\t \"Nuclear Triad\",\n\t \"Special Multimedia Reports\"\n\t ],\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t \"potentialAction\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"CommentAction\",\n\t \"name\": \"Comment\",\n\t \"target\": [\n\t \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/congress\\\/2021\\\/03\\\/01\\\/senate-defense-appropriations-chair-talks-nuclear-modernization-defense-cuts-and-earmarks\\\/#respond\"\n\t ]\n\t }\n\t ]\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"WebPage\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/congress\\\/2021\\\/03\\\/01\\\/senate-defense-appropriations-chair-talks-nuclear-modernization-defense-cuts-and-earmarks\\\/\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/congress\\\/2021\\\/03\\\/01\\\/senate-defense-appropriations-chair-talks-nuclear-modernization-defense-cuts-and-earmarks\\\/\",\n\t \"name\": \"New Senate defense appropriations chairman talks nuclear modernization, defense cuts and earmarks - Defense News\",\n\t \"isPartOf\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#website\"\n\t },\n\t \"primaryImageOfPage\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/congress\\\/2021\\\/03\\\/01\\\/senate-defense-appropriations-chair-talks-nuclear-modernization-defense-cuts-and-earmarks\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t },\n\t \"image\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/congress\\\/2021\\\/03\\\/01\\\/senate-defense-appropriations-chair-talks-nuclear-modernization-defense-cuts-and-earmarks\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t },\n\t \"thumbnailUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/GettyImages-1183636868.jpg.jpg\",\n\t \"datePublished\": \"2021-03-01T19:31:51+00:00\",\n\t \"dateModified\": \"2026-08-07T23:53:18+00:00\",\n\t \"description\": \"Defense News spoke with Sen. Jon Tester about his priorities as the chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee's defense subpanel.\",\n\t \"breadcrumb\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/congress\\\/2021\\\/03\\\/01\\\/senate-defense-appropriations-chair-talks-nuclear-modernization-defense-cuts-and-earmarks\\\/#breadcrumb\"\n\t },\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t \"potentialAction\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ReadAction\",\n\t \"target\": [\n\t \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/congress\\\/2021\\\/03\\\/01\\\/senate-defense-appropriations-chair-talks-nuclear-modernization-defense-cuts-and-earmarks\\\/\"\n\t ]\n\t }\n\t ]\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/congress\\\/2021\\\/03\\\/01\\\/senate-defense-appropriations-chair-talks-nuclear-modernization-defense-cuts-and-earmarks\\\/#primaryimage\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/GettyImages-1183636868.jpg.jpg\",\n\t \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/GettyImages-1183636868.jpg.jpg\"\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"BreadcrumbList\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/congress\\\/2021\\\/03\\\/01\\\/senate-defense-appropriations-chair-talks-nuclear-modernization-defense-cuts-and-earmarks\\\/#breadcrumb\",\n\t \"itemListElement\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t \"position\": 1,\n\t \"name\": \"Home\",\n\t \"item\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t \"ad_zone\": \"home\"\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t \"position\": 2,\n\t \"name\": \"Congress\",\n\t \"item\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/congress\\\/\",\n\t \"ad_zone\": \"congress\"\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t \"position\": 3,\n\t \"name\": \"New Senate defense appropriations chairman talks nuclear modernization, defense cuts and earmarks\"\n\t }\n\t ]\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"WebSite\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#website\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t \"name\": \"Defense News\",\n\t \"description\": \"Covering the politics, business and technology of defense | Defense News\",\n\t \"publisher\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\"\n\t },\n\t \"potentialAction\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"SearchAction\",\n\t \"target\": {\n\t \"@type\": \"EntryPoint\",\n\t \"urlTemplate\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"\n\t },\n\t \"query-input\": {\n\t \"@type\": \"PropertyValueSpecification\",\n\t \"valueRequired\": true,\n\t \"valueName\": \"search_term_string\"\n\t }\n\t }\n\t ],\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\"\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\",\n\t \"name\": \"Defense News\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t \"logo\": {\n\t \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/defensenews-logo-white.png\",\n\t \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/defensenews-logo-white.png\",\n\t \"caption\": \"Defense News\"\n\t },\n\t \"image\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"\n\t }\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"Person\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1\",\n\t \"name\": \"migration\",\n\t \"image\": {\n\t \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=gcf4cb6ee0ec29e49e7a963234e4340ec\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\n\t \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\n\t \"caption\": \"migration\"\n\t },\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/author\\\/migration\\\/\"\n\t }\n\t ]\n\t}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"New Senate defense appropriations chairman talks nuclear modernization, defense cuts and earmarks - Defense News","description":"Defense News spoke with Sen. Jon Tester about his priorities as the chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee's defense subpanel.","robots":{"index":"noindex","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"New Senate defense appropriations chairman talks nuclear modernization, defense cuts and earmarks","og_description":"Defense News spoke with Sen. Jon Tester about his priorities as the chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee's defense subpanel.","og_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/congress\/2021\/03\/01\/senate-defense-appropriations-chair-talks-nuclear-modernization-defense-cuts-and-earmarks\/","og_site_name":"Defense News","article_published_time":"2021-03-01T19:31:51+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-08-07T23:53:18+00:00","author":"Joe Gould","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Joe Gould","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/congress\/2021\/03\/01\/senate-defense-appropriations-chair-talks-nuclear-modernization-defense-cuts-and-earmarks\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/congress\/2021\/03\/01\/senate-defense-appropriations-chair-talks-nuclear-modernization-defense-cuts-and-earmarks\/"},"author":{"name":"migration","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/person\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1"},"headline":"New Senate defense appropriations chairman talks nuclear modernization, defense cuts and earmarks","datePublished":"2021-03-01T19:31:51+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-07T23:53:18+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/congress\/2021\/03\/01\/senate-defense-appropriations-chair-talks-nuclear-modernization-defense-cuts-and-earmarks\/"},"wordCount":1766,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/congress\/2021\/03\/01\/senate-defense-appropriations-chair-talks-nuclear-modernization-defense-cuts-and-earmarks\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/GettyImages-1183636868.jpg.jpg","articleSection":["Budget","Congress","Daily News Roundup","Interviews","Newsletters","Nuclear Triad","Special Multimedia Reports"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/congress\/2021\/03\/01\/senate-defense-appropriations-chair-talks-nuclear-modernization-defense-cuts-and-earmarks\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/congress\/2021\/03\/01\/senate-defense-appropriations-chair-talks-nuclear-modernization-defense-cuts-and-earmarks\/","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/congress\/2021\/03\/01\/senate-defense-appropriations-chair-talks-nuclear-modernization-defense-cuts-and-earmarks\/","name":"New Senate defense appropriations chairman talks nuclear modernization, defense cuts and earmarks - Defense News","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/congress\/2021\/03\/01\/senate-defense-appropriations-chair-talks-nuclear-modernization-defense-cuts-and-earmarks\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/congress\/2021\/03\/01\/senate-defense-appropriations-chair-talks-nuclear-modernization-defense-cuts-and-earmarks\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/GettyImages-1183636868.jpg.jpg","datePublished":"2021-03-01T19:31:51+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-07T23:53:18+00:00","description":"Defense News spoke with Sen. Jon Tester about his priorities as the chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee's defense subpanel.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/congress\/2021\/03\/01\/senate-defense-appropriations-chair-talks-nuclear-modernization-defense-cuts-and-earmarks\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/congress\/2021\/03\/01\/senate-defense-appropriations-chair-talks-nuclear-modernization-defense-cuts-and-earmarks\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/congress\/2021\/03\/01\/senate-defense-appropriations-chair-talks-nuclear-modernization-defense-cuts-and-earmarks\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/GettyImages-1183636868.jpg.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/GettyImages-1183636868.jpg.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/congress\/2021\/03\/01\/senate-defense-appropriations-chair-talks-nuclear-modernization-defense-cuts-and-earmarks\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","ad_zone":"home"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Congress","item":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/congress\/","ad_zone":"congress"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"New Senate defense appropriations chairman talks nuclear modernization, defense cuts and earmarks"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#website","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","name":"Defense News","description":"Covering the politics, business and technology of defense | Defense News","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization","name":"Defense News","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/defensenews-logo-white.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/defensenews-logo-white.png","caption":"Defense News"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/person\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1","name":"migration","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=gcf4cb6ee0ec29e49e7a963234e4340ec","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"migration"},"url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/author\/migration\/"}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"distributor_meta":false,"distributor_terms":false,"distributor_media":false,"distributor_original_site_name":"Defense News","distributor_original_site_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews","push-errors":false,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/GettyImages-1183636868.jpg.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54173","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=54173"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54173\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":54177,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54173\/revisions\/54177"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=54173"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=54173"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=54173"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=54173"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}