{"id":57434,"date":"2018-04-26T16:43:19","date_gmt":"2018-04-26T16:43:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/uncategorized\/2018\/04\/26\/northrop-admits-no-bids-in-gps-iii-satellite-f-35-contests\/"},"modified":"2026-08-08T00:17:28","modified_gmt":"2026-08-08T00:17:28","slug":"northrop-admits-no-bids-in-gps-iii-satellite-f-35-contests","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/industry\/2018\/04\/26\/northrop-admits-no-bids-in-gps-iii-satellite-f-35-contests\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Northrop Grumman didn\u2019t bid in the GPS III satellite, F-35 contests"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">WASHINGTON \u2015 Northrop Grumman for the first time has acknowledged it did not bid on the next-generation of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.defensenews.com\/digital-show-dailies\/space-symposium\/2018\/04\/16\/ocx-at-an-inflection-point-says-pentagons-top-weapons-buyer\/\" title=\"\" class=\"selected-link\" target=\"_blank\">GPS III satellites<\/a>. The company also announced Wednesday it did not make a bid for F-35 distributed aperture system, or DAS, upgrades. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.defensenews.com\/digital-show-dailies\/space-symposium\/2018\/04\/18\/is-incumbent-lockheed-martin-the-only-player-in-the-gps-iii-follow-on-competition\/\" title=\"\" class=\"\" target=\"_blank\">Boeing <\/a>has also publicly stated it did not bid for the program, leaving Lockheed Martin as the de facto contract winner. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">While the specific reasoning motivating these decisions was not fully articulated, the contracts were described as \u201cnot attractive for us\u201d by Northrop President and Chief Operating Officer Kathy Warden on an April 25 earnings call.<\/p>\n\n\n\t<aside class=\"smg-interstitial-link wp-block-smg-interstitial-link\">\n\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/breaking-news\/2017\/02\/01\/northrop-grumman-drops-out-of-t-x-trainer-competition\/\" class=\"smg-interstitial-link__inner\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"smg-interstitial-link__media\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" src=\"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/wes-bus.jpg.jpg?w=300\" class=\"smg-interstitial-link__image wp-post-image\" alt=\"\" \/>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"smg-interstitial-link__content\">\n\t\t\t\t<span class=\"smg-interstitial-link__kicker\">Related<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t<h3 class=\"smg-interstitial-link__title\">Northrop Grumman drops out of T-X trainer competition<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p class=\"smg-interstitial-link__excerpt\">Northrop Grumman has pulled out of the T-X program, becoming the second company to drop from the competition in a matter of weeks.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/a>\n\t<\/aside>\n\t\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">When asked if the decision to not bid on GPS was influenced by <a href=\"http:\/\/thehill.com\/opinion\/technology\/382896-why-nasas-james-webb-space-telescope-is-such-a-fiscal-black-hole\" title=\"\" class=\"selected-link\" target=\"_blank\">setbacks<\/a> the company is experiencing with the James Webb Space Telescope, Wes Bush, Northrop\u2019s chairman and CEO, said the \u201cGPS decision had absolutely nothing to do with anything else going on in the space portfolio other than a relative comparison of the attractiveness of the different opportunities we are pursuing there.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The U.S. Air Force intends to procure up to 22 new satellites during the second phase of GPS III follow-on, with the first vehicle planned for a 2026 delivery.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Lockheed is under contract for the first 10 GPS III satellites and already has six satellites in some state of production, with one of those ready for an expected launch this year.<\/p>\n\n\n\t<aside class=\"smg-interstitial-link wp-block-smg-interstitial-link\">\n\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/industry\/2017\/10\/25\/northrop-pulls-out-of-mq-25-drone-competition\/\" class=\"smg-interstitial-link__inner\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"smg-interstitial-link__media\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" src=\"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/635781703414208219-1893618jpg.jpg?w=300\" class=\"smg-interstitial-link__image wp-post-image\" alt=\"\" \/>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"smg-interstitial-link__content\">\n\t\t\t\t<span class=\"smg-interstitial-link__kicker\">Related<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t<h3 class=\"smg-interstitial-link__title\">Northrop pulls out of MQ-25 drone competition<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p class=\"smg-interstitial-link__excerpt\">It appears the Navy\u2019s final request for proposals, released earlier this month, raised questions among Northrop executives about executability.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/a>\n\t<\/aside>\n\t\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The decision to not bid on F-35 DAS upgrades is more surprising, as Northrop is the incumbent on the contract. Warden explained on the call that even though Northrop has been successfully building these sensors and delivering them on time for many years, the company \u201clooked at the future procurement and decided it wasn\u2019t an attractive business deal for us.\u201d<br><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">But that does not mean Northrop, which manufactures the F-35\u2019s center fuselage, is not sold on the program.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cWe continue to be very optimistic and to be positive on the F-35 as an important part of our business,\u201d Bush said. \u201cF-35 is a very important program to us, the partnership is important to us, but we do take a look at every aspect of the our portfolio from a business case opportunity in a broad sense, and we make very discrete decisions on those.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Bush added that it is not unprecedented for a contract incumbent not to bid on upgrades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cTo some extent, [with] the experience we had on X-47B, everyone thought we were a shoo-in on MQ-25,\u201d he said. \u201cAnd when we looked at the deal, we said: \u2018Eh, I don\u2019t think so.\u2019 So we look at each and every one of these opportunities and test them aggressively to see is this something that merits our investment, merits the application of our broad set of resources and are we really going to be investing them in a wise way to pursue them.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">These no-bids follow a larger pattern for Northrop. The no bids are the fourth and fifth for the company on major defense acquisition programs after earlier decisions to abstain from the Air Force\u2019s T-X training aircraft competition \u2014 which saw the company developing and flying a prototype aircraft \u2014 the Long Range Standoff Weapon and the MQ-25. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Northrop&#8217;s public acknowledgement of a no bid means Lockheed Martin is the only player in the GPS III follow-on competition.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":51433,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-noindex":"","_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-nofollow":"","_yoast_wpseo_canonical":"","_acf":"","_yoast_wpseo_primary_category":12,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","_smg_distribution_targets":{"9":{"categories":["satellites","c2-comms"],"primary_category":"satellites"}}},"categories":[7,160,12,163,36,23],"tags":[],"coauthors":[1233],"class_list":["post-57434","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-air","category-daily-news-roundup","category-industry","category-military-space-report","category-newsletters","category-space"],"acf":{"subheadline":"","legacy_arc_id":"GYWGDKF5D5HQHE3KSAH3LFG42Q","arc_canonical_url":"\/industry\/2018\/04\/26\/northrop-admits-no-bids-in-gps-iii-satellite-f-35-contests\/","remove_feature_photo":false,"is_sponsored":false,"subtype":"","redirect_url":"","disable_inline_ads":false,"native_logo_pretext":"Presented By:"},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.0 (Yoast SEO v28.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Why Northrop Grumman didn\u2019t bid in the GPS III satellite, F-35 contests - Defense News<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Northrop&#039;s public acknowledgement of a no bid means Lockheed Martin is the only player in the GPS III follow-on competition.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/industry\/2018\/04\/26\/northrop-admits-no-bids-in-gps-iii-satellite-f-35-contests\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Why Northrop Grumman didn\u2019t bid in the GPS III satellite, F-35 contests\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Northrop&#039;s public acknowledgement of a no bid means Lockheed Martin is the only player in the GPS III follow-on competition.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/industry\/2018\/04\/26\/northrop-admits-no-bids-in-gps-iii-satellite-f-35-contests\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Defense News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-04-26T16:43:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-08-08T00:17:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Daniel Cebul\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Daniel Cebul\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\n\t    \"@context\": \"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\n\t    \"@graph\": [\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"Article\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/industry\\\/2018\\\/04\\\/26\\\/northrop-admits-no-bids-in-gps-iii-satellite-f-35-contests\\\/#article\",\n\t            \"isPartOf\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/industry\\\/2018\\\/04\\\/26\\\/northrop-admits-no-bids-in-gps-iii-satellite-f-35-contests\\\/\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"author\": {\n\t                \"name\": \"migration\",\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"headline\": \"Why Northrop Grumman didn\u2019t bid in the GPS III satellite, F-35 contests\",\n\t            \"datePublished\": \"2018-04-26T16:43:19+00:00\",\n\t            \"dateModified\": \"2026-08-08T00:17:28+00:00\",\n\t            \"mainEntityOfPage\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/industry\\\/2018\\\/04\\\/26\\\/northrop-admits-no-bids-in-gps-iii-satellite-f-35-contests\\\/\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"wordCount\": 534,\n\t            \"commentCount\": 0,\n\t            \"publisher\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/industry\\\/2018\\\/04\\\/26\\\/northrop-admits-no-bids-in-gps-iii-satellite-f-35-contests\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"thumbnailUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/33816868766_8d3354adb4_k.jpg.jpg\",\n\t            \"articleSection\": [\n\t                \"Air Warfare\",\n\t                \"Daily News Roundup\",\n\t                \"Industry\",\n\t                \"Military Space Report\",\n\t                \"Newsletters\",\n\t                \"Space\"\n\t            ],\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t            \"potentialAction\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"CommentAction\",\n\t                    \"name\": \"Comment\",\n\t                    \"target\": [\n\t                        \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/industry\\\/2018\\\/04\\\/26\\\/northrop-admits-no-bids-in-gps-iii-satellite-f-35-contests\\\/#respond\"\n\t                    ]\n\t                }\n\t            ]\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"WebPage\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/industry\\\/2018\\\/04\\\/26\\\/northrop-admits-no-bids-in-gps-iii-satellite-f-35-contests\\\/\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/industry\\\/2018\\\/04\\\/26\\\/northrop-admits-no-bids-in-gps-iii-satellite-f-35-contests\\\/\",\n\t            \"name\": \"Why Northrop Grumman didn\u2019t bid in the GPS III satellite, F-35 contests - Defense News\",\n\t            \"isPartOf\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#website\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"primaryImageOfPage\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/industry\\\/2018\\\/04\\\/26\\\/northrop-admits-no-bids-in-gps-iii-satellite-f-35-contests\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/industry\\\/2018\\\/04\\\/26\\\/northrop-admits-no-bids-in-gps-iii-satellite-f-35-contests\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"thumbnailUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/33816868766_8d3354adb4_k.jpg.jpg\",\n\t            \"datePublished\": \"2018-04-26T16:43:19+00:00\",\n\t            \"dateModified\": \"2026-08-08T00:17:28+00:00\",\n\t            \"description\": \"Northrop's public acknowledgement of a no bid means Lockheed Martin is the only player in the GPS III follow-on competition.\",\n\t            \"breadcrumb\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/industry\\\/2018\\\/04\\\/26\\\/northrop-admits-no-bids-in-gps-iii-satellite-f-35-contests\\\/#breadcrumb\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t            \"potentialAction\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ReadAction\",\n\t                    \"target\": [\n\t                        \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/industry\\\/2018\\\/04\\\/26\\\/northrop-admits-no-bids-in-gps-iii-satellite-f-35-contests\\\/\"\n\t                    ]\n\t                }\n\t            ]\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/industry\\\/2018\\\/04\\\/26\\\/northrop-admits-no-bids-in-gps-iii-satellite-f-35-contests\\\/#primaryimage\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/33816868766_8d3354adb4_k.jpg.jpg\",\n\t            \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/33816868766_8d3354adb4_k.jpg.jpg\"\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"BreadcrumbList\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/industry\\\/2018\\\/04\\\/26\\\/northrop-admits-no-bids-in-gps-iii-satellite-f-35-contests\\\/#breadcrumb\",\n\t            \"itemListElement\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 1,\n\t                    \"name\": \"Home\",\n\t                    \"item\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t                    \"ad_zone\": \"home\"\n\t                },\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 2,\n\t                    \"name\": \"Industry\",\n\t                    \"item\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/industry\\\/\",\n\t                    \"ad_zone\": \"industry\"\n\t                },\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 3,\n\t                    \"name\": \"Why Northrop Grumman didn\u2019t bid in the GPS III satellite, F-35 contests\"\n\t                }\n\t            ]\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"WebSite\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#website\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t            \"name\": \"Defense News\",\n\t            \"description\": \"Covering the politics, business and technology of defense | Defense News\",\n\t            \"publisher\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"potentialAction\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"SearchAction\",\n\t                    \"target\": {\n\t                        \"@type\": \"EntryPoint\",\n\t                        \"urlTemplate\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"\n\t                    },\n\t                    \"query-input\": {\n\t                        \"@type\": \"PropertyValueSpecification\",\n\t                        \"valueRequired\": true,\n\t                        \"valueName\": \"search_term_string\"\n\t                    }\n\t                }\n\t            ],\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\"\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\",\n\t            \"name\": \"Defense News\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t            \"logo\": {\n\t                \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t                \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\n\t                \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/defensenews-logo-white.png\",\n\t                \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/defensenews-logo-white.png\",\n\t                \"caption\": \"Defense News\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"\n\t            }\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"Person\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1\",\n\t            \"name\": \"migration\",\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t                \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=gcf4cb6ee0ec29e49e7a963234e4340ec\",\n\t                \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\n\t                \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\n\t                \"caption\": \"migration\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/author\\\/migration\\\/\"\n\t        }\n\t    ]\n\t}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Why Northrop Grumman didn\u2019t bid in the GPS III satellite, F-35 contests - Defense News","description":"Northrop's public acknowledgement of a no bid means Lockheed Martin is the only player in the GPS III follow-on competition.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/industry\/2018\/04\/26\/northrop-admits-no-bids-in-gps-iii-satellite-f-35-contests\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Why Northrop Grumman didn\u2019t bid in the GPS III satellite, F-35 contests","og_description":"Northrop's public acknowledgement of a no bid means Lockheed Martin is the only player in the GPS III follow-on competition.","og_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/industry\/2018\/04\/26\/northrop-admits-no-bids-in-gps-iii-satellite-f-35-contests\/","og_site_name":"Defense News","article_published_time":"2018-04-26T16:43:19+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-08-08T00:17:28+00:00","author":"Daniel Cebul","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Daniel Cebul","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/industry\/2018\/04\/26\/northrop-admits-no-bids-in-gps-iii-satellite-f-35-contests\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/industry\/2018\/04\/26\/northrop-admits-no-bids-in-gps-iii-satellite-f-35-contests\/"},"author":{"name":"migration","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/person\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1"},"headline":"Why Northrop Grumman didn\u2019t bid in the GPS III satellite, F-35 contests","datePublished":"2018-04-26T16:43:19+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-08T00:17:28+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/industry\/2018\/04\/26\/northrop-admits-no-bids-in-gps-iii-satellite-f-35-contests\/"},"wordCount":534,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/industry\/2018\/04\/26\/northrop-admits-no-bids-in-gps-iii-satellite-f-35-contests\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/33816868766_8d3354adb4_k.jpg.jpg","articleSection":["Air Warfare","Daily News Roundup","Industry","Military Space Report","Newsletters","Space"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/industry\/2018\/04\/26\/northrop-admits-no-bids-in-gps-iii-satellite-f-35-contests\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/industry\/2018\/04\/26\/northrop-admits-no-bids-in-gps-iii-satellite-f-35-contests\/","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/industry\/2018\/04\/26\/northrop-admits-no-bids-in-gps-iii-satellite-f-35-contests\/","name":"Why Northrop Grumman didn\u2019t bid in the GPS III satellite, F-35 contests - Defense News","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/industry\/2018\/04\/26\/northrop-admits-no-bids-in-gps-iii-satellite-f-35-contests\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/industry\/2018\/04\/26\/northrop-admits-no-bids-in-gps-iii-satellite-f-35-contests\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/33816868766_8d3354adb4_k.jpg.jpg","datePublished":"2018-04-26T16:43:19+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-08T00:17:28+00:00","description":"Northrop's public acknowledgement of a no bid means Lockheed Martin is the only player in the GPS III follow-on competition.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/industry\/2018\/04\/26\/northrop-admits-no-bids-in-gps-iii-satellite-f-35-contests\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/industry\/2018\/04\/26\/northrop-admits-no-bids-in-gps-iii-satellite-f-35-contests\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/industry\/2018\/04\/26\/northrop-admits-no-bids-in-gps-iii-satellite-f-35-contests\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/33816868766_8d3354adb4_k.jpg.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/33816868766_8d3354adb4_k.jpg.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/industry\/2018\/04\/26\/northrop-admits-no-bids-in-gps-iii-satellite-f-35-contests\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","ad_zone":"home"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Industry","item":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/industry\/","ad_zone":"industry"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Why Northrop Grumman didn\u2019t bid in the GPS III satellite, F-35 contests"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#website","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","name":"Defense News","description":"Covering the politics, business and technology of defense | Defense News","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization","name":"Defense News","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/defensenews-logo-white.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/defensenews-logo-white.png","caption":"Defense News"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/person\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1","name":"migration","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=gcf4cb6ee0ec29e49e7a963234e4340ec","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"migration"},"url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/author\/migration\/"}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/33816868766_8d3354adb4_k.jpg.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"distributor_meta":false,"distributor_terms":false,"distributor_media":false,"distributor_original_site_name":"Defense News","distributor_original_site_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews","push-errors":false,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57434","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=57434"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57434\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":57444,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57434\/revisions\/57444"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51433"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=57434"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=57434"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=57434"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=57434"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}