{"id":58053,"date":"2017-10-25T16:24:33","date_gmt":"2017-10-25T16:24:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/uncategorized\/2017\/10\/25\/boeing-hit-with-another-kc-46-cost-overrun-this-time-worth-329m\/"},"modified":"2026-08-08T00:11:01","modified_gmt":"2026-08-08T00:11:01","slug":"boeing-hit-with-another-kc-46-cost-overrun-this-time-worth-329m","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/industry\/2017\/10\/25\/boeing-hit-with-another-kc-46-cost-overrun-this-time-worth-329m\/","title":{"rendered":"Boeing hit with another KC-46 cost overrun, this time worth $329M"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">WASHINGTON \u2014 Boeing on Wednesday disclosed more bad news on the KC-46 program: The company will have to eat another $329 million as a result of cost overruns.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Under the terms of its fixed-price deal with the U.S. Air Force, Boeing must pay out of pocket for any expenses over the $4.9 billion contract value. That agreement has been a tough pill for Boeing to swallow, as the company has now had to cough up about $2.9 billion in pretax fees \u2014 or about $1.9 billion after tax \u2014 as delays and cost overruns mount.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">There are signs another missed milestone may be on the way.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Over the past year, Boeing has remained adamant that it can deliver the first KC-46 aircraft by the end of 2017 \u2014 although the Air Force believes it will be later, likely next spring.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Asked by Defense News whether the company still believes it can hit that deadline, Boeing spokesman Chick Ramey demurred.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cWe\u2019re working with the Air Force on the schedule and expect to deliver the first 18 tankers in 2018,\u201d he said. Regarding a contractual obligation to deliver 18 certified KC-46s and nine refueling pods, \u201cwe remain on track for late next year.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\t<aside class=\"smg-interstitial-link wp-block-smg-interstitial-link\">\n\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/air\/2017\/06\/08\/us-air-force-predicts-first-kc-46-delivery-in-spring-2018-likely-not-this-year\/\" class=\"smg-interstitial-link__inner\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"smg-interstitial-link__media\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"300\" height=\"169\" src=\"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/kc46.jpg.jpg?w=300\" class=\"smg-interstitial-link__image wp-post-image\" alt=\"\" \/>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"smg-interstitial-link__content\">\n\t\t\t\t<span class=\"smg-interstitial-link__kicker\">Related<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t<h3 class=\"smg-interstitial-link__title\">US Air Force predicts first KC-46 delivery in spring 2018, likely not this year<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p class=\"smg-interstitial-link__excerpt\">Based on a schedule risk assessment, the service now believes Boeing will be late delivering the first tanker.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/a>\n\t<\/aside>\n\t\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">According to the company, Wednesday\u2019s cost overrun was driven by \u201cincorporating changes into initial production aircraft as we progress through late-stage testing and the certification process.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Speaking to reporters on Wednesday, Boeing CEO Dennis Muilenburg provided few details about the underlying cause of the cost overrun and instead downplayed the impact of the repeated penalties on the long-term health of the program.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cWe remain very confident,\u201d he said. \u201cThe opportunity is measured in hundreds of aircraft. We expect this to be a long-term production and support franchise, one that will add tremendous value for our customers, and the need for the new tankers is very clear. So the fundamentals for the program are strong, the long-term value proposition is very strong.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The $329 million charge is split between Boeing\u2019s defense business unit, which took on $73 million of the overrun, and its commercial segment, which took on the remainder.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In January, when the company announced a $201 million charge on the tanker, Muilenburg gave a similar reason for the charges. In 2014, the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration discovered that certain wiring bundles in early production aircraft did not meet military requirements, so Boeing had to rework aircraft so redundant groups of wiring were not bundled together.<\/p>\n\n\n\t<aside class=\"smg-interstitial-link wp-block-smg-interstitial-link\">\n\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/air\/2017\/01\/25\/boeing-takes-another-201m-hit-on-kc-46-tanker\/\" class=\"smg-interstitial-link__inner\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"smg-interstitial-link__media\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" src=\"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/2559543.jpg.jpg?w=300\" class=\"smg-interstitial-link__image wp-post-image\" alt=\"\" \/>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"smg-interstitial-link__content\">\n\t\t\t\t<span class=\"smg-interstitial-link__kicker\">Related<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t<h3 class=\"smg-interstitial-link__title\">Boeing Takes Another $201M Hit On KC-46 Tanker<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p class=\"smg-interstitial-link__excerpt\">Boeing on Wednesday announced a $201 million post-tax charge on the KC-46 tanker program, bringing cost overruns on the program up to more than $2 billion dollars.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/a>\n\t<\/aside>\n\t\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Although Boeing cited the modifications to initial production as the cause of cost growth, the company has had numerous technical problems sprout up over the past several months. Most critically, the Air Force has noted numerous events where the KC-46 boom scraped the surface of aircraft \u2014 a deficiency that could possibly cause the tankers to peel away the low-observable coatings of stealth aircraft like the B-2, F-22 and F-35.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Brig. Gen. Donna Shipton, the Air Force\u2019s program executive officer for tankers, told reporters in September that the service will do testing and analysis to better understand the root cause and prove out its hypothesis that \u201cundetected contact\u201d is happening at a higher rate than in the legacy fleet.<\/p>\n\n\n\t<aside class=\"smg-interstitial-link wp-block-smg-interstitial-link\">\n\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/air\/2017\/09\/22\/air-force-aims-to-fix-three-kc-46-deficiencies-before-key-milestone\/\" class=\"smg-interstitial-link__inner\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"smg-interstitial-link__media\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" src=\"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/635808437398013751-october-19-frontlines-3jpg.jpg?w=300\" class=\"smg-interstitial-link__image wp-post-image\" alt=\"\" \/>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"smg-interstitial-link__content\">\n\t\t\t\t<span class=\"smg-interstitial-link__kicker\">Related<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t<h3 class=\"smg-interstitial-link__title\">If unresolved, KC-46 deficiency could threaten acceptance of Boeing tanker<\/h3>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p class=\"smg-interstitial-link__excerpt\">With less than a year left before Boeing must meet a contractual obligation to deliver 18 KC-46 tankers to the Air Force, the program has been hit with three \u201ccategory one\u201d deficiencies \u2014including one that could affect the service\u2019s willingness to accept the aircraft from Boeing.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/a>\n\t<\/aside>\n\t\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">However, the timeline for resolving the problem is still up in the air, as is whether the Air Force will accept KC-46 aircraft if the issue has not been solved.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Muilenburg said that despite the challenging development program, Boeing is closing in on the finish line. The company has completed more than 2,000 hours of flight testing with six tankers, and about 80 percent of flight test requirements have been completed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cWhile we\u2019ve had some issues that have occurred during flight tests that are normal to tanker testing, like the boom scraping issue \u2026 these are not unusual items, and I can tell you the feedback we\u2019ve heard from the customers flying the airplanes is that the airplanes are flying well and the controllability of the boom is excellent,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThe challenges we\u2019re having right now are related to just implementing just final detailed changes on the aircraft to get them to a final certification standard,\u201d he said. \u201cThese are not unusual, but we do have a lot of airplanes flowing concurrently through the production system.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Under its fixed-price contract, the company has now had to cough up about $2.9 billion in pretax fees \u2014 or about $1.9 billion after tax \u2014 as delays and cost overruns mount.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":115538,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-noindex":"","_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-nofollow":"","_yoast_wpseo_canonical":"","_acf":"","_yoast_wpseo_primary_category":12,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","_smg_distribution_targets":[]},"categories":[7,160,12,36],"tags":[],"coauthors":[3384],"class_list":["post-58053","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-air","category-daily-news-roundup","category-industry","category-newsletters"],"acf":{"subheadline":"","legacy_arc_id":"IXJ4UGJ4Q5HRFKKDHSX7QWLASA","arc_canonical_url":"\/air\/2017\/10\/25\/boeing-hit-with-another-kc-46-cost-overrun-this-time-worth-329m\/","remove_feature_photo":false,"is_sponsored":false,"subtype":"","redirect_url":"","disable_inline_ads":false,"native_logo_pretext":"Presented By:"},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.0 (Yoast SEO v28.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Boeing hit with another KC-46 cost overrun, this time worth $329M - Defense News<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Under its fixed-price contract, the company has now had to cough up about $2.9 billion in pretax fees \u2014 or about $1.9 billion after tax \u2014 as delays and cost overruns mount.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Boeing hit with another KC-46 cost overrun, this time worth $329M\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Under its fixed-price contract, the company has now had to cough up about $2.9 billion in pretax fees \u2014 or about $1.9 billion after tax \u2014 as delays and cost overruns mount.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/industry\/2017\/10\/25\/boeing-hit-with-another-kc-46-cost-overrun-this-time-worth-329m\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Defense News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-10-25T16:24:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-08-08T00:11:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Valerie Insinna\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Valerie Insinna\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\n\t    \"@context\": \"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\n\t    \"@graph\": [\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"Article\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/industry\\\/2017\\\/10\\\/25\\\/boeing-hit-with-another-kc-46-cost-overrun-this-time-worth-329m\\\/#article\",\n\t            \"isPartOf\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/industry\\\/2017\\\/10\\\/25\\\/boeing-hit-with-another-kc-46-cost-overrun-this-time-worth-329m\\\/\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"author\": {\n\t                \"name\": \"migration\",\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"headline\": \"Boeing hit with another KC-46 cost overrun, this time worth $329M\",\n\t            \"datePublished\": \"2017-10-25T16:24:33+00:00\",\n\t            \"dateModified\": \"2026-08-08T00:11:01+00:00\",\n\t            \"mainEntityOfPage\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/industry\\\/2017\\\/10\\\/25\\\/boeing-hit-with-another-kc-46-cost-overrun-this-time-worth-329m\\\/\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"wordCount\": 704,\n\t            \"commentCount\": 0,\n\t            \"publisher\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/industry\\\/2017\\\/10\\\/25\\\/boeing-hit-with-another-kc-46-cost-overrun-this-time-worth-329m\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"thumbnailUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/17BFT000088_036_sm.jpg.jpg\",\n\t            \"articleSection\": [\n\t                \"Air Warfare\",\n\t                \"Daily News Roundup\",\n\t                \"Industry\",\n\t                \"Newsletters\"\n\t            ],\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t            \"potentialAction\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"CommentAction\",\n\t                    \"name\": \"Comment\",\n\t                    \"target\": [\n\t                        \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/industry\\\/2017\\\/10\\\/25\\\/boeing-hit-with-another-kc-46-cost-overrun-this-time-worth-329m\\\/#respond\"\n\t                    ]\n\t                }\n\t            ]\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"WebPage\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/industry\\\/2017\\\/10\\\/25\\\/boeing-hit-with-another-kc-46-cost-overrun-this-time-worth-329m\\\/\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/industry\\\/2017\\\/10\\\/25\\\/boeing-hit-with-another-kc-46-cost-overrun-this-time-worth-329m\\\/\",\n\t            \"name\": \"Boeing hit with another KC-46 cost overrun, this time worth $329M - Defense News\",\n\t            \"isPartOf\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#website\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"primaryImageOfPage\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/industry\\\/2017\\\/10\\\/25\\\/boeing-hit-with-another-kc-46-cost-overrun-this-time-worth-329m\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/industry\\\/2017\\\/10\\\/25\\\/boeing-hit-with-another-kc-46-cost-overrun-this-time-worth-329m\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"thumbnailUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/17BFT000088_036_sm.jpg.jpg\",\n\t            \"datePublished\": \"2017-10-25T16:24:33+00:00\",\n\t            \"dateModified\": \"2026-08-08T00:11:01+00:00\",\n\t            \"description\": \"Under its fixed-price contract, the company has now had to cough up about $2.9 billion in pretax fees \u2014 or about $1.9 billion after tax \u2014 as delays and cost overruns mount.\",\n\t            \"breadcrumb\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/industry\\\/2017\\\/10\\\/25\\\/boeing-hit-with-another-kc-46-cost-overrun-this-time-worth-329m\\\/#breadcrumb\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t            \"potentialAction\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ReadAction\",\n\t                    \"target\": [\n\t                        \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/industry\\\/2017\\\/10\\\/25\\\/boeing-hit-with-another-kc-46-cost-overrun-this-time-worth-329m\\\/\"\n\t                    ]\n\t                }\n\t            ]\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/industry\\\/2017\\\/10\\\/25\\\/boeing-hit-with-another-kc-46-cost-overrun-this-time-worth-329m\\\/#primaryimage\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/17BFT000088_036_sm.jpg.jpg\",\n\t            \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/17BFT000088_036_sm.jpg.jpg\"\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"BreadcrumbList\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/industry\\\/2017\\\/10\\\/25\\\/boeing-hit-with-another-kc-46-cost-overrun-this-time-worth-329m\\\/#breadcrumb\",\n\t            \"itemListElement\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 1,\n\t                    \"name\": \"Home\",\n\t                    \"item\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t                    \"ad_zone\": \"home\"\n\t                },\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 2,\n\t                    \"name\": \"Industry\",\n\t                    \"item\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/industry\\\/\",\n\t                    \"ad_zone\": \"industry\"\n\t                },\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 3,\n\t                    \"name\": \"Boeing hit with another KC-46 cost overrun, this time worth $329M\"\n\t                }\n\t            ]\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"WebSite\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#website\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t            \"name\": \"Defense News\",\n\t            \"description\": \"Covering the politics, business and technology of defense | Defense News\",\n\t            \"publisher\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"potentialAction\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"SearchAction\",\n\t                    \"target\": {\n\t                        \"@type\": \"EntryPoint\",\n\t                        \"urlTemplate\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"\n\t                    },\n\t                    \"query-input\": {\n\t                        \"@type\": \"PropertyValueSpecification\",\n\t                        \"valueRequired\": true,\n\t                        \"valueName\": \"search_term_string\"\n\t                    }\n\t                }\n\t            ],\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\"\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\",\n\t            \"name\": \"Defense News\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t            \"logo\": {\n\t                \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t                \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\n\t                \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/defensenews-logo-white.png\",\n\t                \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/defensenews-logo-white.png\",\n\t                \"caption\": \"Defense News\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"\n\t            }\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"Person\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1\",\n\t            \"name\": \"migration\",\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t                \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=gcf4cb6ee0ec29e49e7a963234e4340ec\",\n\t                \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\n\t                \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\n\t                \"caption\": \"migration\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/author\\\/migration\\\/\"\n\t        }\n\t    ]\n\t}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Boeing hit with another KC-46 cost overrun, this time worth $329M - Defense News","description":"Under its fixed-price contract, the company has now had to cough up about $2.9 billion in pretax fees \u2014 or about $1.9 billion after tax \u2014 as delays and cost overruns mount.","robots":{"index":"noindex","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Boeing hit with another KC-46 cost overrun, this time worth $329M","og_description":"Under its fixed-price contract, the company has now had to cough up about $2.9 billion in pretax fees \u2014 or about $1.9 billion after tax \u2014 as delays and cost overruns mount.","og_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/industry\/2017\/10\/25\/boeing-hit-with-another-kc-46-cost-overrun-this-time-worth-329m\/","og_site_name":"Defense News","article_published_time":"2017-10-25T16:24:33+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-08-08T00:11:01+00:00","author":"Valerie Insinna","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Valerie Insinna","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/industry\/2017\/10\/25\/boeing-hit-with-another-kc-46-cost-overrun-this-time-worth-329m\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/industry\/2017\/10\/25\/boeing-hit-with-another-kc-46-cost-overrun-this-time-worth-329m\/"},"author":{"name":"migration","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/person\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1"},"headline":"Boeing hit with another KC-46 cost overrun, this time worth $329M","datePublished":"2017-10-25T16:24:33+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-08T00:11:01+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/industry\/2017\/10\/25\/boeing-hit-with-another-kc-46-cost-overrun-this-time-worth-329m\/"},"wordCount":704,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/industry\/2017\/10\/25\/boeing-hit-with-another-kc-46-cost-overrun-this-time-worth-329m\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/17BFT000088_036_sm.jpg.jpg","articleSection":["Air Warfare","Daily News Roundup","Industry","Newsletters"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/industry\/2017\/10\/25\/boeing-hit-with-another-kc-46-cost-overrun-this-time-worth-329m\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/industry\/2017\/10\/25\/boeing-hit-with-another-kc-46-cost-overrun-this-time-worth-329m\/","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/industry\/2017\/10\/25\/boeing-hit-with-another-kc-46-cost-overrun-this-time-worth-329m\/","name":"Boeing hit with another KC-46 cost overrun, this time worth $329M - Defense News","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/industry\/2017\/10\/25\/boeing-hit-with-another-kc-46-cost-overrun-this-time-worth-329m\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/industry\/2017\/10\/25\/boeing-hit-with-another-kc-46-cost-overrun-this-time-worth-329m\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/17BFT000088_036_sm.jpg.jpg","datePublished":"2017-10-25T16:24:33+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-08T00:11:01+00:00","description":"Under its fixed-price contract, the company has now had to cough up about $2.9 billion in pretax fees \u2014 or about $1.9 billion after tax \u2014 as delays and cost overruns mount.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/industry\/2017\/10\/25\/boeing-hit-with-another-kc-46-cost-overrun-this-time-worth-329m\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/industry\/2017\/10\/25\/boeing-hit-with-another-kc-46-cost-overrun-this-time-worth-329m\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/industry\/2017\/10\/25\/boeing-hit-with-another-kc-46-cost-overrun-this-time-worth-329m\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/17BFT000088_036_sm.jpg.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/17BFT000088_036_sm.jpg.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/industry\/2017\/10\/25\/boeing-hit-with-another-kc-46-cost-overrun-this-time-worth-329m\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","ad_zone":"home"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Industry","item":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/industry\/","ad_zone":"industry"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Boeing hit with another KC-46 cost overrun, this time worth $329M"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#website","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","name":"Defense News","description":"Covering the politics, business and technology of defense | Defense News","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization","name":"Defense News","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/defensenews-logo-white.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/defensenews-logo-white.png","caption":"Defense News"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/person\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1","name":"migration","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=gcf4cb6ee0ec29e49e7a963234e4340ec","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"migration"},"url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/author\/migration\/"}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"distributor_meta":false,"distributor_terms":false,"distributor_media":false,"distributor_original_site_name":"Defense News","distributor_original_site_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews","push-errors":false,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/17BFT000088_036_sm.jpg.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58053","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=58053"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58053\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":58059,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58053\/revisions\/58059"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=58053"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=58053"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=58053"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=58053"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}