{"id":58826,"date":"2019-09-05T19:19:02","date_gmt":"2019-09-05T19:19:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/uncategorized\/2019\/09\/05\/trump-drains-us-spending-in-europe-to-pay-for-wall-with-mexico\/"},"modified":"2026-08-08T00:16:55","modified_gmt":"2026-08-08T00:16:55","slug":"trump-drains-us-spending-in-europe-to-pay-for-wall-with-mexico","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/congress\/2019\/09\/05\/trump-drains-us-spending-in-europe-to-pay-for-wall-with-mexico\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump drains US spending in Europe to pay for wall with Mexico"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Note: This article was updated to include comments from Defense Secretary Mark Esper.<\/i><\/p>\n\n\n\n

WASHINGTON \u2014 Defense Secretary suggested European allies replenish the $771 million meant to shore up Europe\u2019s defensive posture against Russia to fund<\/a> President Donald Trump\u2019s U.S.-Mexico border barrier.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The announcement is sure to jar European allies, where NATO members have nervously watched the president\u2019s on-again, off-again commitment to the alliance. And it could deal a blow to the narrative among allies that Trump\u2019s boisterous rhetoric should be taken with a grain of salt, given that money has kept flowing from Washington despite trans-Atlantic disagreements.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Half of the $3.6 billion for the border wall would come from dozens of U.S. military construction projects, and the other half would come from projects in Europe and the Pacific. In Europe, there were roughly 40 projects, including training facilities for special forces in Estonia and aviation infrastructure in Germany, Hungary and Slovakia.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Trump is gambling that Congress and allies will eventually restore the money used for the wall, he originally said Mexico would pay for. Defense Secretary Mark Esper suggested<\/a> that European nations should consider funding projects in their countries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThe message that I\u2019ve been carrying, since when I was acting secretary to today, has been about the increase in burden sharing,\u201d Esper told reporters in London late on Thursday.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cSo part of the message will be \u2018Look, if you\u2019re really concerned then maybe you should look to cover those projects for us\u2019 because that\u2019s going to build infrastructure in many cases in their countries,\u201d he added.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As it stands, the maneuver will weaken NATO efforts to deter Russia, feed growing doubts that America would come to Europe\u2019s defense and undermine extensive plans to strengthen NATO\u2019s eastern flank, according to former U.S. Ambassador to NATO Ivo Daalder, now president of the Chicago Council on Global Affairs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cIf you looked at the state of the alliance, you could say the bad news was the president\u2019s rhetoric was problematic for alliance unity, but the administration\u2019s growing investment suggested on a sub-political level the alliance was getting stronger,\u201d Daalder said Thursday. \u201cI can no longer make that argument because we\u2019ve just [signaled] we\u2019re going to cut back on that investment.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\t