{"id":60306,"date":"2016-07-07T14:01:22","date_gmt":"2016-07-07T14:01:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/uncategorized\/2016\/07\/07\/f-35-ejection-seat-concerns-have-not-reached-lockheed-martin\/"},"modified":"2026-08-08T00:23:10","modified_gmt":"2026-08-08T00:23:10","slug":"f-35-ejection-seat-concerns-have-not-reached-lockheed-martin","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/digital-show-dailies\/farnborough\/2016\/07\/07\/f-35-ejection-seat-concerns-have-not-reached-lockheed-martin\/","title":{"rendered":"F-35 Ejection Seat Concerns Have Not Reached Lockheed Martin"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">RAF FAIRFORD, England \u2014 While the Air Force may have developed a hint of second thoughts on the F-35A&#8217;s ejection seat, aircraft manufacturer Lockheed Martin has not been approached by the joint program office to weigh alternatives, a company official said Thursday.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Defense News broke the story last month that the service is considering the certification of United Technologies&#8217; ACES 5 design as a fallback to the currently planned Martin-Baker US16E seat. Lt. Gen. Arnold Bunch, the Air Force&#8217;s top uniformed acquisition official, said then that the service was studying the cost and logistics of adopting a different seat as a risk-mitigation measure in case the Martin-Baker equipment failed to meet safety requirements.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Jeff Babione, Lockheed&#8217;s executive vice president and general manager of the F-35 program, noted that Lockheed has not been asked by the joint program office to assess the ACES 5 seat, but would be willing to do so if the government deems it necessary. He declined to speculate about the impact of integrating an alternative seat to the F-35&#8217;s cost and schedule.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;The details of the kind of testing, cost and schedule of integrating another seat would really be out of scope right now,&#8221; he said during an exclusive interview ahead of the Royal International Air Tattoo here. &#8220;If the JPO decides that they would like Lockheed Martin to look at that, we&#8217;re there to support, but right now we&#8217;re focused on finishing Martin-Baker integration and I have complete confidence that that&#8217;s going to be a success.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Last year, the Air Force found that pilots weighing less than 136 pounds were at risk of severe neck injury when ejected from the F-35. Martin-Baker has since incorporated a number of fixes into its seat, including adding a head support panel to prevent injury when the parachute is deployed, and modifying its software to lessen the impact on pilots of the parachute deploying.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Martin-Baker and the F-35 JPO have released statements to Defense News contending\u00a0that the\u00a0modified seat will demonstrate improved pilot safety, and\u00a0Babione echoed that view.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">&#8220;We have every confidence with the latest changes that the seat will be fully qualified for all weights, sizes and heights of pilots that the F-35 can be certified for,&#8221; he\u00a0said. &#8220;And I think that will all be resolved by the end of this fall.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>While the Air Force may develop second thoughts on the F-35A\u2019s ejection seat, aircraft manufacturer Lockheed Martin says the company has not been approached by the joint program office to weigh alternatives.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":116216,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-noindex":"","_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-nofollow":"","_yoast_wpseo_canonical":"","_acf":"","_yoast_wpseo_primary_category":87,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","_smg_distribution_targets":[]},"categories":[29,87,33],"tags":[],"coauthors":[3384],"class_list":["post-60306","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-digital-show-dailies","category-farnborough","category-home"],"acf":{"subheadline":"","legacy_arc_id":"HZMXTQASKNCYLA3NTNHYTAYX5U","arc_canonical_url":"\/digital-show-dailies\/farnborough\/2016\/07\/07\/f-35-ejection-seat-concerns-have-not-reached-lockheed-martin\/","remove_feature_photo":false,"is_sponsored":false,"subtype":"","redirect_url":"","disable_inline_ads":false,"native_logo_pretext":"Presented By:"},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.0 (Yoast SEO v28.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>F-35 Ejection Seat Concerns Have Not Reached Lockheed Martin - Defense News<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"While the Air Force may develop second thoughts on the F-35A\u2019s ejection seat, aircraft manufacturer Lockheed Martin says the company has not been approached by the joint program office to weigh alternatives.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"F-35 Ejection Seat Concerns Have Not Reached Lockheed Martin\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"While the Air Force may develop second thoughts on the F-35A\u2019s ejection seat, aircraft manufacturer Lockheed Martin says the company has not been approached by the joint program office to weigh alternatives.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/digital-show-dailies\/farnborough\/2016\/07\/07\/f-35-ejection-seat-concerns-have-not-reached-lockheed-martin\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Defense News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-07-07T14:01:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-08-08T00:23:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Valerie Insinna\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Valerie Insinna\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\n\t    \"@context\": \"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\n\t    \"@graph\": [\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"Article\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/digital-show-dailies\\\/farnborough\\\/2016\\\/07\\\/07\\\/f-35-ejection-seat-concerns-have-not-reached-lockheed-martin\\\/#article\",\n\t            \"isPartOf\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/digital-show-dailies\\\/farnborough\\\/2016\\\/07\\\/07\\\/f-35-ejection-seat-concerns-have-not-reached-lockheed-martin\\\/\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"author\": {\n\t                \"name\": \"migration\",\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"headline\": \"F-35 Ejection Seat Concerns Have Not Reached Lockheed Martin\",\n\t            \"datePublished\": \"2016-07-07T14:01:22+00:00\",\n\t            \"dateModified\": \"2026-08-08T00:23:10+00:00\",\n\t            \"mainEntityOfPage\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/digital-show-dailies\\\/farnborough\\\/2016\\\/07\\\/07\\\/f-35-ejection-seat-concerns-have-not-reached-lockheed-martin\\\/\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"wordCount\": 400,\n\t            \"commentCount\": 0,\n\t            \"publisher\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/digital-show-dailies\\\/farnborough\\\/2016\\\/07\\\/07\\\/f-35-ejection-seat-concerns-have-not-reached-lockheed-martin\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"thumbnailUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/636034820445555473-f-35-seatjpg.jpg\",\n\t            \"articleSection\": [\n\t                \"Digital Show Dailies\",\n\t                \"Farnborough\",\n\t                \"Home\"\n\t            ],\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t            \"potentialAction\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"CommentAction\",\n\t                    \"name\": \"Comment\",\n\t                    \"target\": [\n\t                        \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/digital-show-dailies\\\/farnborough\\\/2016\\\/07\\\/07\\\/f-35-ejection-seat-concerns-have-not-reached-lockheed-martin\\\/#respond\"\n\t                    ]\n\t                }\n\t            ]\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"WebPage\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/digital-show-dailies\\\/farnborough\\\/2016\\\/07\\\/07\\\/f-35-ejection-seat-concerns-have-not-reached-lockheed-martin\\\/\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/digital-show-dailies\\\/farnborough\\\/2016\\\/07\\\/07\\\/f-35-ejection-seat-concerns-have-not-reached-lockheed-martin\\\/\",\n\t            \"name\": \"F-35 Ejection Seat Concerns Have Not Reached Lockheed Martin - Defense News\",\n\t            \"isPartOf\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#website\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"primaryImageOfPage\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/digital-show-dailies\\\/farnborough\\\/2016\\\/07\\\/07\\\/f-35-ejection-seat-concerns-have-not-reached-lockheed-martin\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/digital-show-dailies\\\/farnborough\\\/2016\\\/07\\\/07\\\/f-35-ejection-seat-concerns-have-not-reached-lockheed-martin\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"thumbnailUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/636034820445555473-f-35-seatjpg.jpg\",\n\t            \"datePublished\": \"2016-07-07T14:01:22+00:00\",\n\t            \"dateModified\": \"2026-08-08T00:23:10+00:00\",\n\t            \"description\": \"While the Air Force may develop second thoughts on the F-35A\u2019s ejection seat, aircraft manufacturer Lockheed Martin says the company has not been approached by the joint program office to weigh alternatives.\",\n\t            \"breadcrumb\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/digital-show-dailies\\\/farnborough\\\/2016\\\/07\\\/07\\\/f-35-ejection-seat-concerns-have-not-reached-lockheed-martin\\\/#breadcrumb\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t            \"potentialAction\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ReadAction\",\n\t                    \"target\": [\n\t                        \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/digital-show-dailies\\\/farnborough\\\/2016\\\/07\\\/07\\\/f-35-ejection-seat-concerns-have-not-reached-lockheed-martin\\\/\"\n\t                    ]\n\t                }\n\t            ]\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/digital-show-dailies\\\/farnborough\\\/2016\\\/07\\\/07\\\/f-35-ejection-seat-concerns-have-not-reached-lockheed-martin\\\/#primaryimage\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/636034820445555473-f-35-seatjpg.jpg\",\n\t            \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/636034820445555473-f-35-seatjpg.jpg\"\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"BreadcrumbList\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/digital-show-dailies\\\/farnborough\\\/2016\\\/07\\\/07\\\/f-35-ejection-seat-concerns-have-not-reached-lockheed-martin\\\/#breadcrumb\",\n\t            \"itemListElement\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 1,\n\t                    \"name\": \"Home\",\n\t                    \"item\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t                    \"ad_zone\": \"home\"\n\t                },\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 2,\n\t                    \"name\": \"Farnborough\",\n\t                    \"item\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/digital-show-dailies\\\/farnborough\\\/\",\n\t                    \"ad_zone\": \"farnborough\"\n\t                },\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 3,\n\t                    \"name\": \"F-35 Ejection Seat Concerns Have Not Reached Lockheed Martin\"\n\t                }\n\t            ]\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"WebSite\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#website\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t            \"name\": \"Defense News\",\n\t            \"description\": \"Covering the politics, business and technology of defense | Defense News\",\n\t            \"publisher\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"potentialAction\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"SearchAction\",\n\t                    \"target\": {\n\t                        \"@type\": \"EntryPoint\",\n\t                        \"urlTemplate\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"\n\t                    },\n\t                    \"query-input\": {\n\t                        \"@type\": \"PropertyValueSpecification\",\n\t                        \"valueRequired\": true,\n\t                        \"valueName\": \"search_term_string\"\n\t                    }\n\t                }\n\t            ],\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\"\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\",\n\t            \"name\": \"Defense News\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t            \"logo\": {\n\t                \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t                \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\n\t                \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/defensenews-logo-white.png\",\n\t                \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/defensenews-logo-white.png\",\n\t                \"caption\": \"Defense News\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"\n\t            }\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"Person\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1\",\n\t            \"name\": \"migration\",\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t                \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=gcf4cb6ee0ec29e49e7a963234e4340ec\",\n\t                \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\n\t                \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\n\t                \"caption\": \"migration\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/author\\\/migration\\\/\"\n\t        }\n\t    ]\n\t}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"F-35 Ejection Seat Concerns Have Not Reached Lockheed Martin - Defense News","description":"While the Air Force may develop second thoughts on the F-35A\u2019s ejection seat, aircraft manufacturer Lockheed Martin says the company has not been approached by the joint program office to weigh alternatives.","robots":{"index":"noindex","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"F-35 Ejection Seat Concerns Have Not Reached Lockheed Martin","og_description":"While the Air Force may develop second thoughts on the F-35A\u2019s ejection seat, aircraft manufacturer Lockheed Martin says the company has not been approached by the joint program office to weigh alternatives.","og_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/digital-show-dailies\/farnborough\/2016\/07\/07\/f-35-ejection-seat-concerns-have-not-reached-lockheed-martin\/","og_site_name":"Defense News","article_published_time":"2016-07-07T14:01:22+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-08-08T00:23:10+00:00","author":"Valerie Insinna","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Valerie Insinna","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/digital-show-dailies\/farnborough\/2016\/07\/07\/f-35-ejection-seat-concerns-have-not-reached-lockheed-martin\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/digital-show-dailies\/farnborough\/2016\/07\/07\/f-35-ejection-seat-concerns-have-not-reached-lockheed-martin\/"},"author":{"name":"migration","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/person\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1"},"headline":"F-35 Ejection Seat Concerns Have Not Reached Lockheed Martin","datePublished":"2016-07-07T14:01:22+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-08T00:23:10+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/digital-show-dailies\/farnborough\/2016\/07\/07\/f-35-ejection-seat-concerns-have-not-reached-lockheed-martin\/"},"wordCount":400,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/digital-show-dailies\/farnborough\/2016\/07\/07\/f-35-ejection-seat-concerns-have-not-reached-lockheed-martin\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/636034820445555473-f-35-seatjpg.jpg","articleSection":["Digital Show Dailies","Farnborough","Home"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/digital-show-dailies\/farnborough\/2016\/07\/07\/f-35-ejection-seat-concerns-have-not-reached-lockheed-martin\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/digital-show-dailies\/farnborough\/2016\/07\/07\/f-35-ejection-seat-concerns-have-not-reached-lockheed-martin\/","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/digital-show-dailies\/farnborough\/2016\/07\/07\/f-35-ejection-seat-concerns-have-not-reached-lockheed-martin\/","name":"F-35 Ejection Seat Concerns Have Not Reached Lockheed Martin - Defense News","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/digital-show-dailies\/farnborough\/2016\/07\/07\/f-35-ejection-seat-concerns-have-not-reached-lockheed-martin\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/digital-show-dailies\/farnborough\/2016\/07\/07\/f-35-ejection-seat-concerns-have-not-reached-lockheed-martin\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/636034820445555473-f-35-seatjpg.jpg","datePublished":"2016-07-07T14:01:22+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-08T00:23:10+00:00","description":"While the Air Force may develop second thoughts on the F-35A\u2019s ejection seat, aircraft manufacturer Lockheed Martin says the company has not been approached by the joint program office to weigh alternatives.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/digital-show-dailies\/farnborough\/2016\/07\/07\/f-35-ejection-seat-concerns-have-not-reached-lockheed-martin\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/digital-show-dailies\/farnborough\/2016\/07\/07\/f-35-ejection-seat-concerns-have-not-reached-lockheed-martin\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/digital-show-dailies\/farnborough\/2016\/07\/07\/f-35-ejection-seat-concerns-have-not-reached-lockheed-martin\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/636034820445555473-f-35-seatjpg.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/636034820445555473-f-35-seatjpg.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/digital-show-dailies\/farnborough\/2016\/07\/07\/f-35-ejection-seat-concerns-have-not-reached-lockheed-martin\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","ad_zone":"home"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Farnborough","item":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/digital-show-dailies\/farnborough\/","ad_zone":"farnborough"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"F-35 Ejection Seat Concerns Have Not Reached Lockheed Martin"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#website","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","name":"Defense News","description":"Covering the politics, business and technology of defense | Defense News","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization","name":"Defense News","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/defensenews-logo-white.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/defensenews-logo-white.png","caption":"Defense News"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/person\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1","name":"migration","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=gcf4cb6ee0ec29e49e7a963234e4340ec","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"migration"},"url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/author\/migration\/"}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"distributor_meta":false,"distributor_terms":false,"distributor_media":false,"distributor_original_site_name":"Defense News","distributor_original_site_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews","push-errors":false,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/636034820445555473-f-35-seatjpg.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60306","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=60306"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60306\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":60315,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60306\/revisions\/60315"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=60306"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=60306"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=60306"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=60306"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}