{"id":61480,"date":"2020-08-17T12:00:00","date_gmt":"2020-08-17T12:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/uncategorized\/2020\/08\/17\/in-developing-robot-warships-us-navy-wants-to-avoid-another-littoral-combat-ship\/"},"modified":"2026-08-08T00:36:08","modified_gmt":"2026-08-08T00:36:08","slug":"in-developing-robot-warships-us-navy-wants-to-avoid-another-littoral-combat-ship","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/naval\/2020\/08\/17\/in-developing-robot-warships-us-navy-wants-to-avoid-another-littoral-combat-ship\/","title":{"rendered":"In developing robot warships, US Navy wants to avoid another littoral combat ship"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

WASHINGTON \u2014 As the U.S. Navy pushes forward with developing<\/a> its large unmanned surface vessel, envisioned as a kind of external missile magazine that will tag along with larger manned surface combatants, a growing consensus is forming that the service needs to get its requirements and systems right<\/a> before making a big investment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Congress has, for the second year in a row, slowed the development of the large unmanned surface vessel, or LUSV, in the 2020 National Defense Authorization Act. The language in this year\u2019s bill would essentially force the Navy to have a working prototype with all systems tested and fully integrated before using procurement dollars for the boats<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In an exclusive July 16 interview with Defense News, Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Michael Gilday said that while the marks were frustrating, he agreed with Congress that requirements must be concrete right up front.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThe approach has to be deliberate,\u201d Gilday said. \u201cWe have to make sure that the systems that are on those unmanned systems with respect to the [hull, mechanical and electrical system], that they are designed to requirement, and perform to requirement. And most importantly, are those requirements sound?<\/p>\n\n\n\t