{"id":65479,"date":"2023-10-04T13:00:00","date_gmt":"2023-10-04T13:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/uncategorized\/2023\/10\/04\/can-the-us-navy-save-money-by-accepting-the-lcs-as-a-sunk-cost\/"},"modified":"2026-08-08T00:49:15","modified_gmt":"2026-08-08T00:49:15","slug":"can-the-us-navy-save-money-by-accepting-the-lcs-as-a-sunk-cost","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/naval\/2023\/10\/04\/can-the-us-navy-save-money-by-accepting-the-lcs-as-a-sunk-cost\/","title":{"rendered":"Can the US Navy save money by accepting the LCS as a sunk cost?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

WASHINGTON \u2014 It\u2019s been called an \u201centirely new breed of U.S. Navy warship\u201d and a \u201clemon.\u201d A \u201cmothership\u201d for unmanned systems and \u201cthe wrong ship at the wrong time.\u201d A cornerstone of the Navy\u2019s \u201ctransformation\u201d and the \u201clittle crappy ship.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is the littoral combat ship, which in its 22-year history has never been easy to label. That is until recently; the LCS has now become an enormous sunk cost.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Navy is decommissioning nine of 35 littoral combat ships in the next few years, alongside the five already abandoned. Some, like the recently retired LCS Sioux City, entered service less than five years ago.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Decommissioning these ships early amounts to a loss of almost $7 billion based on analysis by Defense News using data from the Congressional Budget Office. But experts say the opportunity cost is more significant as the Pentagon prepares for a potential war with China, which in the last 20 years has built extensive anti-access, area denial defenses to keep ships like the LCS away from its shores.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201c[These] ships were built for a world that no longer exists,\u201d said Jerry Hendrix, a retired Navy captain and former Pentagon official, who is now a senior fellow with the Sagamore Institute think tank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It\u2019s a moment of irony for the Navy: decommissioning young ships while trying to expand its fleet. The LCS, analysts and former Pentagon officials told Defense News, was designed to be the Navy\u2019s ship of the future. But in the process, it became a program meant to do too much, too soon, and at too low a price tag to succeed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cDecommissioning them is a terrible decision,\u201d said Bryan McGrath, a former naval officer and lead author of the Navy\u2019s 2007 strategy document, who is now managing director of The FerryBridge Group defense consultancy. \u201cBut the only decision worse than that would be keeping them.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2018Pedal to the metal\u2019<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

In 2001, the Navy had a numbers problem. In the previous decade, following the end of the Cold War, the service had retired more than 200 active ships<\/a>. A further 50 destroyers and frigates were set to retire, starting in 2005.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

New ships were under development, including the Zumwalt-class destroyer and Ford-class aircraft carrier. But these large-scale combatants were too expensive to replace the outgoing ships one for one. The Navy needed a small combatant, cheap enough to build in mass and nimble enough for lower-level missions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Indeed, the Office of the Secretary of Defense told the Navy there would be no Zumwalt<\/a> without plans for a small combatant, which would need to cost a third of one Arleigh Burke-class destroyer \u2014 or around $400 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The LCS was designed to be just that ship. But from the start, the program served two masters: On one hand, it was meant to fill a demonstrated need; on the other, it became a catchall for the Pentagon\u2019s new initiatives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cIt was just born in a way that was almost guaranteed to fail,\u201d said Bryan Clark, director of the Center for Defense Concepts and Technology at the Hudson Institute think tank.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Before becoming defense secretary in 2001, Donald Rumsfeld had spent years arguing the Pentagon needed \u201ctransformation,\u201d or as he said in 2002, \u201cto behave somewhat less like bureaucrats and more like venture capitalists.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This ship would test that model.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

First was the concept. The Navy had identified three missions suited for a small combatant: anti-submarine warfare, surface warfare and minesweeping. Rather than build three ships, or even three different hulls, Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Vern Clark pushed for one. (Clark served as CNO from 2000 to 2005.)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
U.S. Navy personnel demonstrate the mine countermeasure mission package aboard an expeditionary sea base vessel in 2019. The demo showed the package could be used aboard vessels in addition to littoral combat ships. (Anthony Powers\/U.S. Navy)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

It would have a single \u201cseaframe\u201d with modular \u201cmission packages\u201d that could be swapped out depending on the need \u2014 like a Swiss Army knife.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThe idea [for the ship] was rather radical at the time,\u201d said Bob Work, who served as deputy defense secretary and undersecretary of the Navy during the Obama administration. \u201cWhat people don\u2019t remember is this is something the Navy had never done before.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To lower personnel costs, the ship would have a condensed crew \u2014 less than 90 members compared to the 200 or so for a frigate<\/a>. Hence, its sailors would need to be highly trained and make greater use of unmanned systems, which soon became a priority for the Navy as the Air Force began using Predator and Reaper drones in the Middle East.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cNobody wanted to say no [to these requirements] because this was an example of transformation,\u201d said Clark of the Hudson Institute.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The second hallmark was the program\u2019s speed. The LCS skirted the usual process for vetting a new ship, instead taking a path later referred to by a budget expert as an \u201canalytical virgin birth<\/a>.\u201d Congress funded the Navy\u2019s budget request for the ship in 2003 while warning that the service lacked a \u201croad map.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

From there, the LCS moved quickly. The first model entered service in 2008, three or four years ahead of the Pentagon\u2019s usual acquisition pace.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cWe made the decision to put the pedal to the metal all at once,\u201d Hendrix said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Problems and price tags<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

The program had three core goals: to be high tech, low cost and fast paced. But its aims were too high.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cWhat went wrong was the Navy couldn\u2019t get the mission packages to work,\u201d said Work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There were engineering snags. The submarine warfare package, intended to detect and attack submarines in shallow waters, needed a sonar hitched to the back of the ship, but it wasn\u2019t trailing correctly. The minesweeping package, designed to clear mines with unmanned systems, began hitting delays.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Compounding these flaws were problems with the hulls. Some experienced transmission issues, and others began to crack<\/a> at high speeds \u2014 a problem since moving quickly was a priority for the ship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The modular design \u2014 in which users could rotate equipment \u2014 was also proving impractical in terms of transporting the packages and quickly installing them<\/a>. Furthermore, the specialized crews required for each mission drifted between ships, unable to gel with their vessel or their fellow sailors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cUltimately [the model requires] very senior crews that are stuck on these not-very-capable ships,\u201d a Democratic aide with the House Armed Services Committee told Defense News on the condition of anonymity to speak candidly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

These issues increased costs, but the extent of those overruns wasn\u2019t immediately clear. Despite its technical problems, the LCS was still considered for years a low-cost way to expand the fleet.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To achieve this, Congress initially encouraged the Navy to have two companies develop models, and then pick one. Those companies \u2014 General Dynamics and Lockheed Martin \u2014 competed so aggressively that their advertised costs came in low enough it seemed possible to buy both. Congress approved block-buy contracts for 22 ships, starting in 2010.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
The U.S. Navy\u2019s littoral combat ship Billings is a Freedom-class variant, built by Lockheed Martin and able to perform surface warfare missions. (MC3 Aaron Lau\/U.S. Navy)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Adm. Vern Clark, the top Navy officer at the time, had initially hoped each ship would cost $250 million<\/a>, or five for every one Arleigh Burke destroyer. But with engineering woes and program delays, prices began to rise. In 2016, after persistent engine problems, the Navy ordered a 60-day review of the program, which recommended a host of technical and personnel changes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, the engineering problems didn\u2019t stop. In 2022, the Navy dropped its plan for an anti-submarine warfare mission package. By then, the service had already started decommissioning several of the first LCSs built, which hadn\u2019t received any upgrades since construction and were projected to cost $2.5 billion to update.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to the Congressional Budget Office, each ship cost about $500 million \u2014 some more than $600 million \u2014 after factoring in the mission packages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cI don\u2019t think we\u2019re going to be decommissioning many that are all sunshine, no rain clouds,\u201d said Mark Montgomery, a retired Navy rear admiral and a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies think tank. \u201cI\u2019m pretty confident that we\u2019re decommissioning things that are maintenance burdens.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The new small combatant<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

In spring 2022, the Navy announced a plan to decommission nine LCSs in the coming years because they wouldn\u2019t help the service in a potential fight against China, which is among the Biden administration\u2019s priorities for military planning.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Analysts and former Pentagon officials interviewed by Defense News largely agreed with that assessment, though some questioned whether it\u2019s the best way to judge the fleet.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Under the Biden administration, \u201cmy impression of the way the Navy responds to its political tasking is that if your widget, your ship, your platform does not directly contribute to the fight with China, it is in jeopardy,\u201d said McGrath, the former naval officer. But he noted the Navy also has peacetime missions and requires a mix of high- and low-end systems to accomplish its different goals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cWe spend most of our time not being shot at,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Others said they felt frustrated at seeing the ships abandoned so soon, given the Navy reported to Congress last year that the LCS was at last \u201con trend to meet design requirements for the [minesweeping] and [surface warfare] missions as they were established.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This March, more than 20 years after the LCS program began, the minesweeping mission package reached initial operating capability. That marks two of the program\u2019s three main successes, said Clark of the Hudson Institute.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The mine-clearing mission package is the world\u2019s first to entirely use unmanned vehicles to neutralize minefields, he said. In addition, most of the Independence-class LCSs, whose design was less afflicted by engineering issues than the Freedom class, will remain in service.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The other success is the industrial capacity the program protected, according to Hendrix. By keeping two shipyards open, he said, the Navy maintained skilled workers. For example, the Marinette Marine shipyard in Wisconsin, which produced the rapidly decommissioning Freedom-class LCS, is now building the Constellation-class frigate, the Navy\u2019s new small combatant.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This frigate has in some ways benefited from the failures of the LCS program. Its multimission design makes it capable of air warfare, surface warfare and anti-submarine warfare, but without needing to attach or detach equipment, like the LCS.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In some ways, accepting the littoral combat ships as a sunk cost will save money, experts said. The operating costs for each one are around $70 million each year, said Mackenzie Eaglen of the American Enterprise Institute think tank. Operating and support costs end up being about 70%<\/a> of the total price tag for a ship\u2019s expected life span.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Better to discard systems with little utility than to keep wasting money on them, said Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash., the ranking member of the House Armed Services Committee.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThe lesson that LCS has proved is that if a ship doesn\u2019t provide capable and relevant warfighting ability, it doesn\u2019t matter what capacity they provide,\u201d he told Defense News.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Keeping up with threats<\/h1>\n\n\n\n

Operating costs aside, the LCS program is still largely defined by its delays and waste.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Defense News estimates the value of lost service life at $7 billion by dividing the cost of each LCS seaframe (in 2023 dollars) by its intended service life of 25 years, and then multiplying out the cost of each unused year.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For example, a ship that cost $500 million and was intended to sail for 25 years should cost $20 million per year \u2014 plus operating costs, which were saved. But if it only served for five, it left 20 years \u2014 and hence $400 million worth of intended service life \u2014 dormant.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Still, the most significant waste for the LCS program may be a lost opportunity, Hendrix said. The time and resources spent building these ships could have gone toward building more capable and better-suited vessels for today\u2019s threats.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Certainly the three missions of the LCS focused on countering anti-access, area denial capabilities, but that technology from the early 2000s has since advanced, rendering the LCS nearly useless against China.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Years before the program began, in 1996, the U.S. sailed a carrier strike group through the Taiwan Strait as a warning to China, which considers the island nation a rogue province. It angered Chinese leadership, who began working on missile defense systems with a range farther off its coast.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This took place around the same time the U.S. Navy was preparing for a \u201cbrown water\u201d fleet, which would operate closer to land, said Eaglen. The LCS was one of several systems designed for such environments and perhaps the clearest example of that thinking\u2019s obsolescence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Now, given China\u2019s defenses, the Navy no longer has the same freedom to operate in littoral environments \u2014 at least in a hypothetical war over Taiwan. A generation of U.S. Navy programs, argued Hendrix, were designed for the wrong challenges.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cWe zigged and the world zagged,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Navy isn\u2019t the only service that failed to prepare for today\u2019s threats. After 20 years mired in the Middle East, rather than preparing for an ascendant China, former Pentagon officials rue a missed opportunity. The services have since pivoted to intense competition with the Asian nation, but for the U.S. Navy, that came after it started buying the LCS. This left the service with a slew of ships it considers strategically irrelevant for its \u201cpacing challenge.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Technical issues aside, the Navy\u2019s ship of the future couldn\u2019t survive the challenges of the future.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cIt\u2019s a shame that we came to this realization after we bought all the ships,\u201d the congressional aide said. \u201cBut I guess better late than never.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Decommissioning these ships early amounts to a loss of almost $7 billion based on analysis by Defense News.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":117951,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"single-post-featured-layout","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-noindex":"","_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-nofollow":"","_yoast_wpseo_canonical":"","_acf":"","_yoast_wpseo_primary_category":16,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","_smg_distribution_targets":{"2":{"categories":["your-military","pentagon-congress","news"],"primary_category":"your-military"},"7":{"categories":["your-navy","newsletters","daily-news-roundup","pentagon-congress","news"],"primary_category":"your-navy"}}},"categories":[44,8,160,11,16,36,19,38,48],"tags":[],"coauthors":[3458],"class_list":["post-65479","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-budget","category-congress","category-daily-news-roundup","category-global","category-naval","category-newsletters","category-pentagon","category-special-reports","category-the-americas"],"acf":{"subheadline":"","legacy_arc_id":"XKGPCUX2FVFUNKHKH4UXCEADPQ","arc_canonical_url":"\/naval\/2023\/10\/04\/can-the-us-navy-save-money-by-accepting-the-lcs-as-a-sunk-cost\/","remove_feature_photo":false,"is_sponsored":false,"subtype":"featured-layout","redirect_url":"","disable_inline_ads":false,"native_logo_pretext":"Presented By:"},"yoast_head":"\nCan the US Navy save money by accepting the LCS as a sunk cost? - Defense News<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Decommissioning these ships early amounts to a loss of almost $7 billion based on analysis by Defense News.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Can the US Navy save money by accepting the LCS as a sunk cost?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Decommissioning these ships early amounts to a loss of almost $7 billion based on analysis by Defense News.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/naval\/2023\/10\/04\/can-the-us-navy-save-money-by-accepting-the-lcs-as-a-sunk-cost\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Defense News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-10-04T13:00:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-08-08T00:49:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Noah Robertson\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Noah Robertson\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\n\t \"@context\": \"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\n\t \"@graph\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"Article\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/naval\\\/2023\\\/10\\\/04\\\/can-the-us-navy-save-money-by-accepting-the-lcs-as-a-sunk-cost\\\/#article\",\n\t \"isPartOf\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/naval\\\/2023\\\/10\\\/04\\\/can-the-us-navy-save-money-by-accepting-the-lcs-as-a-sunk-cost\\\/\"\n\t },\n\t \"author\": {\n\t \"name\": \"migration\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1\"\n\t },\n\t \"headline\": \"Can the US Navy save money by accepting the LCS as a sunk cost?\",\n\t \"datePublished\": \"2023-10-04T13:00:00+00:00\",\n\t \"dateModified\": \"2026-08-08T00:49:15+00:00\",\n\t \"mainEntityOfPage\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/naval\\\/2023\\\/10\\\/04\\\/can-the-us-navy-save-money-by-accepting-the-lcs-as-a-sunk-cost\\\/\"\n\t },\n\t \"wordCount\": 2294,\n\t \"commentCount\": 0,\n\t \"publisher\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\"\n\t },\n\t \"image\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/naval\\\/2023\\\/10\\\/04\\\/can-the-us-navy-save-money-by-accepting-the-lcs-as-a-sunk-cost\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t },\n\t \"thumbnailUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/30_naval_LCS.jpg.jpg\",\n\t \"articleSection\": [\n\t \"Budget\",\n\t \"Congress\",\n\t \"Daily News Roundup\",\n\t \"Global\",\n\t \"Naval\",\n\t \"Newsletters\",\n\t \"Pentagon\",\n\t \"Special Reports & Exclusives\",\n\t \"The Americas\"\n\t ],\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t \"potentialAction\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"CommentAction\",\n\t \"name\": \"Comment\",\n\t \"target\": [\n\t \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/naval\\\/2023\\\/10\\\/04\\\/can-the-us-navy-save-money-by-accepting-the-lcs-as-a-sunk-cost\\\/#respond\"\n\t ]\n\t }\n\t ]\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"WebPage\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/naval\\\/2023\\\/10\\\/04\\\/can-the-us-navy-save-money-by-accepting-the-lcs-as-a-sunk-cost\\\/\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/naval\\\/2023\\\/10\\\/04\\\/can-the-us-navy-save-money-by-accepting-the-lcs-as-a-sunk-cost\\\/\",\n\t \"name\": \"Can the US Navy save money by accepting the LCS as a sunk cost? - Defense News\",\n\t \"isPartOf\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#website\"\n\t },\n\t \"primaryImageOfPage\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/naval\\\/2023\\\/10\\\/04\\\/can-the-us-navy-save-money-by-accepting-the-lcs-as-a-sunk-cost\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t },\n\t \"image\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/naval\\\/2023\\\/10\\\/04\\\/can-the-us-navy-save-money-by-accepting-the-lcs-as-a-sunk-cost\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t },\n\t \"thumbnailUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/30_naval_LCS.jpg.jpg\",\n\t \"datePublished\": \"2023-10-04T13:00:00+00:00\",\n\t \"dateModified\": \"2026-08-08T00:49:15+00:00\",\n\t \"description\": \"Decommissioning these ships early amounts to a loss of almost $7 billion based on analysis by Defense News.\",\n\t \"breadcrumb\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/naval\\\/2023\\\/10\\\/04\\\/can-the-us-navy-save-money-by-accepting-the-lcs-as-a-sunk-cost\\\/#breadcrumb\"\n\t },\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t \"potentialAction\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ReadAction\",\n\t \"target\": [\n\t \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/naval\\\/2023\\\/10\\\/04\\\/can-the-us-navy-save-money-by-accepting-the-lcs-as-a-sunk-cost\\\/\"\n\t ]\n\t }\n\t ]\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/naval\\\/2023\\\/10\\\/04\\\/can-the-us-navy-save-money-by-accepting-the-lcs-as-a-sunk-cost\\\/#primaryimage\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/30_naval_LCS.jpg.jpg\",\n\t \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/30_naval_LCS.jpg.jpg\"\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"BreadcrumbList\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/naval\\\/2023\\\/10\\\/04\\\/can-the-us-navy-save-money-by-accepting-the-lcs-as-a-sunk-cost\\\/#breadcrumb\",\n\t \"itemListElement\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t \"position\": 1,\n\t \"name\": \"Home\",\n\t \"item\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t \"ad_zone\": \"home\"\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t \"position\": 2,\n\t \"name\": \"Naval\",\n\t \"item\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/naval\\\/\",\n\t \"ad_zone\": \"naval\"\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t \"position\": 3,\n\t \"name\": \"Can the US Navy save money by accepting the LCS as a sunk cost?\"\n\t }\n\t ]\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"WebSite\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#website\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t \"name\": \"Defense News\",\n\t \"description\": \"Covering the politics, business and technology of defense | Defense News\",\n\t \"publisher\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\"\n\t },\n\t \"potentialAction\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"SearchAction\",\n\t \"target\": {\n\t \"@type\": \"EntryPoint\",\n\t \"urlTemplate\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"\n\t },\n\t \"query-input\": {\n\t \"@type\": \"PropertyValueSpecification\",\n\t \"valueRequired\": true,\n\t \"valueName\": \"search_term_string\"\n\t }\n\t }\n\t ],\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\"\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\",\n\t \"name\": \"Defense News\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t \"logo\": {\n\t \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/defensenews-logo-white.png\",\n\t \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/defensenews-logo-white.png\",\n\t \"caption\": \"Defense News\"\n\t },\n\t \"image\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"\n\t }\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"Person\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1\",\n\t \"name\": \"migration\",\n\t \"image\": {\n\t \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=gcf4cb6ee0ec29e49e7a963234e4340ec\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\n\t \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\n\t \"caption\": \"migration\"\n\t },\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/author\\\/migration\\\/\"\n\t }\n\t ]\n\t}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Can the US Navy save money by accepting the LCS as a sunk cost? - Defense News","description":"Decommissioning these ships early amounts to a loss of almost $7 billion based on analysis by Defense News.","robots":{"index":"noindex","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Can the US Navy save money by accepting the LCS as a sunk cost?","og_description":"Decommissioning these ships early amounts to a loss of almost $7 billion based on analysis by Defense News.","og_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/naval\/2023\/10\/04\/can-the-us-navy-save-money-by-accepting-the-lcs-as-a-sunk-cost\/","og_site_name":"Defense News","article_published_time":"2023-10-04T13:00:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-08-08T00:49:15+00:00","author":"Noah Robertson","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Noah Robertson","Est. reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/naval\/2023\/10\/04\/can-the-us-navy-save-money-by-accepting-the-lcs-as-a-sunk-cost\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/naval\/2023\/10\/04\/can-the-us-navy-save-money-by-accepting-the-lcs-as-a-sunk-cost\/"},"author":{"name":"migration","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/person\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1"},"headline":"Can the US Navy save money by accepting the LCS as a sunk cost?","datePublished":"2023-10-04T13:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-08T00:49:15+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/naval\/2023\/10\/04\/can-the-us-navy-save-money-by-accepting-the-lcs-as-a-sunk-cost\/"},"wordCount":2294,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/naval\/2023\/10\/04\/can-the-us-navy-save-money-by-accepting-the-lcs-as-a-sunk-cost\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/30_naval_LCS.jpg.jpg","articleSection":["Budget","Congress","Daily News Roundup","Global","Naval","Newsletters","Pentagon","Special Reports & Exclusives","The Americas"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/naval\/2023\/10\/04\/can-the-us-navy-save-money-by-accepting-the-lcs-as-a-sunk-cost\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/naval\/2023\/10\/04\/can-the-us-navy-save-money-by-accepting-the-lcs-as-a-sunk-cost\/","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/naval\/2023\/10\/04\/can-the-us-navy-save-money-by-accepting-the-lcs-as-a-sunk-cost\/","name":"Can the US Navy save money by accepting the LCS as a sunk cost? - Defense News","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/naval\/2023\/10\/04\/can-the-us-navy-save-money-by-accepting-the-lcs-as-a-sunk-cost\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/naval\/2023\/10\/04\/can-the-us-navy-save-money-by-accepting-the-lcs-as-a-sunk-cost\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/30_naval_LCS.jpg.jpg","datePublished":"2023-10-04T13:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-08T00:49:15+00:00","description":"Decommissioning these ships early amounts to a loss of almost $7 billion based on analysis by Defense News.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/naval\/2023\/10\/04\/can-the-us-navy-save-money-by-accepting-the-lcs-as-a-sunk-cost\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/naval\/2023\/10\/04\/can-the-us-navy-save-money-by-accepting-the-lcs-as-a-sunk-cost\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/naval\/2023\/10\/04\/can-the-us-navy-save-money-by-accepting-the-lcs-as-a-sunk-cost\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/30_naval_LCS.jpg.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/30_naval_LCS.jpg.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/naval\/2023\/10\/04\/can-the-us-navy-save-money-by-accepting-the-lcs-as-a-sunk-cost\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","ad_zone":"home"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Naval","item":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/naval\/","ad_zone":"naval"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Can the US Navy save money by accepting the LCS as a sunk cost?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#website","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","name":"Defense News","description":"Covering the politics, business and technology of defense | Defense News","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization","name":"Defense News","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/defensenews-logo-white.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/defensenews-logo-white.png","caption":"Defense News"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/person\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1","name":"migration","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=gcf4cb6ee0ec29e49e7a963234e4340ec","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"migration"},"url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/author\/migration\/"}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"distributor_meta":false,"distributor_terms":false,"distributor_media":false,"distributor_original_site_name":"Defense News","distributor_original_site_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews","push-errors":false,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/30_naval_LCS.jpg.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65479","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=65479"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65479\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":65485,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65479\/revisions\/65485"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=65479"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=65479"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=65479"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=65479"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}