Australian National Audit Office report<\/a>, citing serious flaws.<\/p>\n\n\n\nThe first phase of the Sea 5000 program involves the production of the ships for the Royal Australian Navy. The government of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese received an independent study of the planned surface fleet on Sept. 29, but its findings will not be made public until the end of the first quarter of 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Former U.S. Navy Vice Adm. William Hilarides conducted the study following recommendations in Australia\u2019s most recent Defence Strategic Review, which called for an enhanced, long-range strike capability, among other things.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
But in the meantime, BAE Systems Australia\u2019s managing director for maritime business has pushed back against critics, telling reporters at the Indo Pacific International Maritime Exposition in November that the future frigate recently completed its preliminary design review.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cIt still meets all of [Australia\u2019s] key 23 performance criteria [for] speed, range, endurance, seakeeping [and] underwater radiated noise, so I would challenge you to determine why it is still referred to as too heavy and too slow,\u201d Craig Lockhart said. \u201cIn fact, it\u2019s still [capable of] 27 knots-plus. And when we get the first ship in the water and get upwards of 31 or 32 knots in the real testing trials, then it will become our model benchmark.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Design changes<\/h1>\n\n\n\n Under the current plan, Australia is seeking to build nine frigates based on the British Type 26 Global Combat Ship design, but featuring an indigenous phased array radar from CEA Technologies and a Saab Australia-made 9LV combat system.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Australian government chose this modified design, known as the Hunter class, in 2018. BAE Systems Australia is the prime contractor for the Hunter-class frigate program, having beat out Italian firm Fincantieri\u2019s FREMM pitch and Spanish shipbuilder Navantia\u2019s offering of a modified F100 variant.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
BAE is currently completing a series of prototyping activities at a purposely designed shipyard in Osborne, South Australia.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The changes to the baseline Type 26 design have resulted in a reduced design margin in terms of weight; the vessel will now displace almost 10,000 tons \u2014 an increase over the originally planned 8,800 tons. This is what drove analysts to claim the Hunter-class frigates will not meet the original specifications, as it will end up too big, too heavy and too slow.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In anticipation of future security threats to Australia, as forecast in the Defence Strategic Review, Lockhart revealed at November\u2019s expo that the firm has been working on a modified Hunter design, with some high-end anti-submarine warfare equipment removed and the number of vertical launching system cells increased from 32 to 96. VLS cells are used to launch missiles from ships.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Lockhart said that because production for the frigates will take place in three batches, each including three ships, the latest design \u2014 dubbed Hunter Guided Missile Frigate \u2014 could be the first vessel in the second batch, which would come with additional options in terms of technological features.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
BAE replaced a flexible mission bay in the back half of the ship with a new strike module that houses 64 VLS cells and four quad-pack launchers for the Kongsberg-made Naval Strike Missile. Lockhart said the new strike module is designed for the American-made MK 41 VLS but can accommodate the MK 57 VLS used on the U.S. Navy\u2019s Zumwalt-class destroyers.<\/p>\n\n\n\nA Kongsberg-made Naval Strike Missile launches from the U.S. Navy littoral combat ship Coronado during testing in 2014 off the coast of Southern California. (MC2 Zachary D. Bell\/U.S. Navy)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n\u201cYou would need to go to a 13,000-ton ship like the [U.S. Navy\u2019s] Arleigh Burke-[class destroyer] to get the same capability, which is too big and too slow\u201d he said. \u201cWhereas the Hunter Guided Missile Frigate gives us that capability and it retains enough [anti-submarine warfare] capability to do a very good job.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
But Marcus Hellyer, the chief researcher at the consultancy Strategic Analysis Australia, said the removal of the mission bay impacts the ship\u2019s anti-submarine warfare role \u201cby eliminating its ability to operate a second helicopter and potentially its towed array sonar.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cVLS cells have become a convenient proxy to assess the combat power of warships. By this standard, the Hunter-class frigate\u2019s 32 VLS cells fall short of other warships of a similar size,\u201d Hellyer told Defense News. \u201cThe critics\u2019 case is that the Hunter is very poor value for money for such a small number of cells and resultant combat capability.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cBut it\u2019s a more complex issue than simply numbers,\u201d he added. \u201cVLS cells are used primarily for air defense missiles and then land-strike missiles. The primarily role of the Hunter is ASW [anti-submarine warfare], so does it need more than 32 cells? But if the primary role of the Hunter is ASW, why did [the Department of] Defence require significant design changes that are primarily about enhancing its air defense capabilities?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Getting your money\u2019s worth<\/h1>\n\n\n\n For its part, the Australian National Audit Office report, released in May, described the Defence Department\u2019s management of the frigate acquisition process as only \u201cpartly effective.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cDefence\u2019s procurement process and related advisory processes lacked a value for money focus,\u201d the report noted, \u201cand key records, including the rationale for the procurement approach, were not retained.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cContract expenditure to date has not been effective in delivering on project milestones, and the project is experiencing an 18-month delay and additional costs due in large part to design immaturity,\u201d it added. \u201cDefence did not conduct an effective limited tender process for the ship design. The value for money of the three competing designs was not assessed by officials.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\nAustralian Defence Department Secretary Greg Moriarty attends a hearing before lawmakers on June 2, 2021. (Sam Mooy\/Getty Images)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\nDefence Secretary Greg Moriarty responded to the report in November, acknowledging failures in the department\u2019s tender process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cPlanning for procurement fell into a process of disjointed advice to government that did not include deliberate steps to maintain clear coherent goals and a procurement method commensurate with the scale, scope and risk of the procurement,\u201d Moriarty said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Then on Dec. 5, a secret document made available to lawmakers revealed the program\u2019s selection process focused on high-end capabilities at the expense of value for money, which went against Australia\u2019s Commonwealth Procurement Rules.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cThe Department [of Defence] did not fulfil the requirements of the CPRs in relation to achieving value for money,\u201d the document read. \u201cThe review team considers that it was highly improbable all members were sufficiently familiar with the procurement process to make an informed opinion as to which tender best supported the achievement of project objectives on value for money.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
And this, said Hellyer, is another area in which program observers find fault.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cTo the critics, [the Department of] Defence has asked for a ship that does everything, resulting in something that doesn\u2019t do anything particularly well in light of its very high cost,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Analysts have criticized the program, citing the frigate design\u2019s weight growth, scheduling delays and what they view as an inadequate number of VLS cells.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":118327,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-noindex":"","_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-nofollow":"","_yoast_wpseo_canonical":"","_acf":"","_yoast_wpseo_primary_category":16,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","_smg_distribution_targets":[]},"categories":[45,160,11,12,49,16,36],"tags":[],"coauthors":[3417],"class_list":["post-66376","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-asia-pacific","category-daily-news-roundup","category-global","category-industry","category-techwatch","category-naval","category-newsletters"],"acf":{"subheadline":"","legacy_arc_id":"M6NCQKTEZFALXFH62ZGYZGIUPU","arc_canonical_url":"\/naval\/2023\/12\/21\/australias-anti-submarine-frigate-program-sails-rough-seas\/","remove_feature_photo":false,"is_sponsored":false,"subtype":"","redirect_url":"","disable_inline_ads":false,"native_logo_pretext":"Presented By:"},"yoast_head":"\n
Australia\u2019s anti-submarine frigate program sails rough seas - Defense News<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Analysts have criticized the program, citing the frigate design\u2019s weight growth, scheduling delays and what they view as an inadequate number of VLS cells.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Australia\u2019s anti-submarine frigate program sails rough seas\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Analysts have criticized the program, citing the frigate design\u2019s weight growth, scheduling delays and what they view as an inadequate number of VLS cells.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/naval\/2023\/12\/21\/australias-anti-submarine-frigate-program-sails-rough-seas\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Defense News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-12-21T15:45:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-08-08T01:01:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Nigel Pittaway\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Nigel Pittaway\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\n\t \"@context\": \"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\n\t \"@graph\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"Article\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/naval\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/21\\\/australias-anti-submarine-frigate-program-sails-rough-seas\\\/#article\",\n\t \"isPartOf\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/naval\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/21\\\/australias-anti-submarine-frigate-program-sails-rough-seas\\\/\"\n\t },\n\t \"author\": {\n\t \"name\": \"migration\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1\"\n\t },\n\t \"headline\": \"Australia\u2019s anti-submarine frigate program sails rough seas\",\n\t \"datePublished\": \"2023-12-21T15:45:36+00:00\",\n\t \"dateModified\": \"2026-08-08T01:01:19+00:00\",\n\t \"mainEntityOfPage\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/naval\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/21\\\/australias-anti-submarine-frigate-program-sails-rough-seas\\\/\"\n\t },\n\t \"wordCount\": 1204,\n\t \"commentCount\": 0,\n\t \"publisher\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\"\n\t },\n\t \"image\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/naval\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/21\\\/australias-anti-submarine-frigate-program-sails-rough-seas\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t },\n\t \"thumbnailUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/RS119945_gcsax-closeup-fire_3840-hpr.jpg.jpg\",\n\t \"articleSection\": [\n\t \"Asia Pacific\",\n\t \"Daily News Roundup\",\n\t \"Global\",\n\t \"Industry\",\n\t \"MilTech\",\n\t \"Naval\",\n\t \"Newsletters\"\n\t ],\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t \"potentialAction\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"CommentAction\",\n\t \"name\": \"Comment\",\n\t \"target\": [\n\t \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/naval\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/21\\\/australias-anti-submarine-frigate-program-sails-rough-seas\\\/#respond\"\n\t ]\n\t }\n\t ]\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"WebPage\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/naval\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/21\\\/australias-anti-submarine-frigate-program-sails-rough-seas\\\/\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/naval\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/21\\\/australias-anti-submarine-frigate-program-sails-rough-seas\\\/\",\n\t \"name\": \"Australia\u2019s anti-submarine frigate program sails rough seas - Defense News\",\n\t \"isPartOf\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#website\"\n\t },\n\t \"primaryImageOfPage\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/naval\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/21\\\/australias-anti-submarine-frigate-program-sails-rough-seas\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t },\n\t \"image\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/naval\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/21\\\/australias-anti-submarine-frigate-program-sails-rough-seas\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t },\n\t \"thumbnailUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/RS119945_gcsax-closeup-fire_3840-hpr.jpg.jpg\",\n\t \"datePublished\": \"2023-12-21T15:45:36+00:00\",\n\t \"dateModified\": \"2026-08-08T01:01:19+00:00\",\n\t \"description\": \"Analysts have criticized the program, citing the frigate design\u2019s weight growth, scheduling delays and what they view as an inadequate number of VLS cells.\",\n\t \"breadcrumb\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/naval\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/21\\\/australias-anti-submarine-frigate-program-sails-rough-seas\\\/#breadcrumb\"\n\t },\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t \"potentialAction\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ReadAction\",\n\t \"target\": [\n\t \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/naval\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/21\\\/australias-anti-submarine-frigate-program-sails-rough-seas\\\/\"\n\t ]\n\t }\n\t ]\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/naval\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/21\\\/australias-anti-submarine-frigate-program-sails-rough-seas\\\/#primaryimage\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/RS119945_gcsax-closeup-fire_3840-hpr.jpg.jpg\",\n\t \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/RS119945_gcsax-closeup-fire_3840-hpr.jpg.jpg\"\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"BreadcrumbList\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/naval\\\/2023\\\/12\\\/21\\\/australias-anti-submarine-frigate-program-sails-rough-seas\\\/#breadcrumb\",\n\t \"itemListElement\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t \"position\": 1,\n\t \"name\": \"Home\",\n\t \"item\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t \"ad_zone\": \"home\"\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t \"position\": 2,\n\t \"name\": \"Naval\",\n\t \"item\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/naval\\\/\",\n\t \"ad_zone\": \"naval\"\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t \"position\": 3,\n\t \"name\": \"Australia\u2019s anti-submarine frigate program sails rough seas\"\n\t }\n\t ]\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"WebSite\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#website\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t \"name\": \"Defense News\",\n\t \"description\": \"Covering the politics, business and technology of defense | Defense News\",\n\t \"publisher\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\"\n\t },\n\t \"potentialAction\": [\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"SearchAction\",\n\t \"target\": {\n\t \"@type\": \"EntryPoint\",\n\t \"urlTemplate\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"\n\t },\n\t \"query-input\": {\n\t \"@type\": \"PropertyValueSpecification\",\n\t \"valueRequired\": true,\n\t \"valueName\": \"search_term_string\"\n\t }\n\t }\n\t ],\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\"\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#organization\",\n\t \"name\": \"Defense News\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/\",\n\t \"logo\": {\n\t \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/defensenews-logo-white.png\",\n\t \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/defensenews-logo-white.png\",\n\t \"caption\": \"Defense News\"\n\t },\n\t \"image\": {\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"\n\t }\n\t },\n\t {\n\t \"@type\": \"Person\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1\",\n\t \"name\": \"migration\",\n\t \"image\": {\n\t \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=gcf4cb6ee0ec29e49e7a963234e4340ec\",\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\n\t \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\n\t \"caption\": \"migration\"\n\t },\n\t \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/defensenews\\\/author\\\/migration\\\/\"\n\t }\n\t ]\n\t}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Australia\u2019s anti-submarine frigate program sails rough seas - Defense News","description":"Analysts have criticized the program, citing the frigate design\u2019s weight growth, scheduling delays and what they view as an inadequate number of VLS cells.","robots":{"index":"noindex","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Australia\u2019s anti-submarine frigate program sails rough seas","og_description":"Analysts have criticized the program, citing the frigate design\u2019s weight growth, scheduling delays and what they view as an inadequate number of VLS cells.","og_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/naval\/2023\/12\/21\/australias-anti-submarine-frigate-program-sails-rough-seas\/","og_site_name":"Defense News","article_published_time":"2023-12-21T15:45:36+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-08-08T01:01:19+00:00","author":"Nigel Pittaway","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Nigel Pittaway","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/naval\/2023\/12\/21\/australias-anti-submarine-frigate-program-sails-rough-seas\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/naval\/2023\/12\/21\/australias-anti-submarine-frigate-program-sails-rough-seas\/"},"author":{"name":"migration","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/person\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1"},"headline":"Australia\u2019s anti-submarine frigate program sails rough seas","datePublished":"2023-12-21T15:45:36+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-08T01:01:19+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/naval\/2023\/12\/21\/australias-anti-submarine-frigate-program-sails-rough-seas\/"},"wordCount":1204,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/naval\/2023\/12\/21\/australias-anti-submarine-frigate-program-sails-rough-seas\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/RS119945_gcsax-closeup-fire_3840-hpr.jpg.jpg","articleSection":["Asia Pacific","Daily News Roundup","Global","Industry","MilTech","Naval","Newsletters"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/naval\/2023\/12\/21\/australias-anti-submarine-frigate-program-sails-rough-seas\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/naval\/2023\/12\/21\/australias-anti-submarine-frigate-program-sails-rough-seas\/","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/naval\/2023\/12\/21\/australias-anti-submarine-frigate-program-sails-rough-seas\/","name":"Australia\u2019s anti-submarine frigate program sails rough seas - Defense News","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/naval\/2023\/12\/21\/australias-anti-submarine-frigate-program-sails-rough-seas\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/naval\/2023\/12\/21\/australias-anti-submarine-frigate-program-sails-rough-seas\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/RS119945_gcsax-closeup-fire_3840-hpr.jpg.jpg","datePublished":"2023-12-21T15:45:36+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-08T01:01:19+00:00","description":"Analysts have criticized the program, citing the frigate design\u2019s weight growth, scheduling delays and what they view as an inadequate number of VLS cells.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/naval\/2023\/12\/21\/australias-anti-submarine-frigate-program-sails-rough-seas\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/naval\/2023\/12\/21\/australias-anti-submarine-frigate-program-sails-rough-seas\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/naval\/2023\/12\/21\/australias-anti-submarine-frigate-program-sails-rough-seas\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/RS119945_gcsax-closeup-fire_3840-hpr.jpg.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/RS119945_gcsax-closeup-fire_3840-hpr.jpg.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/naval\/2023\/12\/21\/australias-anti-submarine-frigate-program-sails-rough-seas\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","ad_zone":"home"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Naval","item":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/naval\/","ad_zone":"naval"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Australia\u2019s anti-submarine frigate program sails rough seas"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#website","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","name":"Defense News","description":"Covering the politics, business and technology of defense | Defense News","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#organization","name":"Defense News","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/defensenews-logo-white.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/defensenews-logo-white.png","caption":"Defense News"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/#\/schema\/person\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1","name":"migration","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=gcf4cb6ee0ec29e49e7a963234e4340ec","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"migration"},"url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/author\/migration\/"}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"distributor_meta":false,"distributor_terms":false,"distributor_media":false,"distributor_original_site_name":"Defense News","distributor_original_site_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews","push-errors":false,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/RS119945_gcsax-closeup-fire_3840-hpr.jpg.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66376","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66376"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66376\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":66383,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66376\/revisions\/66383"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66376"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66376"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66376"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/defensenews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=66376"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
![\"\"](\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/nav-harpoon-replacementjpg.jpg\")
![\"\"](\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/GettyImages-1321232041.jpg.jpg\")