A federal judge in Texas overstepped his authority when he blocked President Joe Biden\u2019s requirement that all federal employees get vaccinated against COVID-19, an attorney for the administration told a federal appeals court panel Tuesday.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Department of Justice lawyer Charles Scarborough noted that district judges in a dozen jurisdictions had rejected a challenge to the vaccine requirement for federal workers. U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Brown, who was appointed to the District Court for the Southern District of Texas by President Donald Trump, issued a nationwide injunction against the requirement in January.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Scarborough argued that the Constitution gives the president, as the head of the federal workforce, the same authority as the CEO of a private corporation has to require that employees be vaccinated. \u201cThis is the president exercising his authority as an employer,\u201d Scarborough said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
He also argued that the case does not belong in federal court because federal employees have administrative civil service remedies they must exhaust first before heading to court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Arguing for those challenging the mandate, lawyer Trent McCotter said it was the administration that was exceeding its statutory and constitutional power. McCotter referenced the recent Supreme Court opinion that the government cannot force private employers to require employee vaccinations. He said the federal employee mandate was the same kind of \u201ccoercive choice\u201d struck down in that case. \u201cIt\u2019s a sort of freestanding, ongoing constitutional injury,\u201d McCotter said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
It was the second time in a month that the 5th Circuit dealt with the issue. A different panel refused last month to block Brown\u2019s ruling pending appeal. That panel\u2019s vote was 2-1, with no reasons given by the majority but a lengthy dissent by Judge Stephen Higginson, who said a single district judge \u201clacking public health expertise and made unaccountable through life tenure,\u201d should not be able to block the president from ordering the same type of COVID-19 safety measures many private sector CEO\u2019s have ordered.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In Tuesday\u2019s hearing, Judge Carl Stewart questioned whether Brown was right to order that his ruling apply nationwide. McCotter defended the scope of the ruling. \u201cUnless he makes this a broad, clear injunction, then individuals entitled to relief are going to fall through the cracks.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Tuesday\u2019s panel members gave no indication when they would rule. The panel consisted of Stewart, an appointee of President Bill Clinton; Rhesa Barksdale, appointed by President George H.W. Bush; and Judge James Dennis, another Clinton appointee.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The federal employee vaccination requirement is one of multiple related vaccine mandates being tested in federal courts. Biden\u2019s order that private employers force workers to get vaccinated was struck down by the Supreme Court. But on the same day, the high court removed lower court blocks on enforcement of a mandate that a wide array of health care providers funded through Medicate or Medicaid require that their employees be vaccinated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A requirement that federal contractors and subcontractors require employee vaccinations is on hold. A federal judge in Georgia blocked that mandate nationwide and the Atlanta-based 11th Circuit appeals court is to hear arguments in that case April 8.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
A requirement that federal contractors and subcontractors require employee vaccinations is on hold. A federal judge in Georgia blocked that mandate nationwide and the Atlanta-based 11th Circuit appeals court is to hear arguments in that case April 8.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":37928,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-noindex":"","_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-nofollow":"","_yoast_wpseo_canonical":"","_acf":"","_yoast_wpseo_primary_category":0,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","_smg_distribution_targets":[]},"categories":[106,31,33,9],"tags":[],"coauthors":[5478],"class_list":["post-12801","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-daily-brief","category-home","category-newsletters","category-federal-oversight"],"acf":{"subheadline":"","legacy_arc_id":"RR5JKQSE5RCF7PLIEJ5MBSKRKU","arc_canonical_url":"\/federal-oversight\/2022\/03\/08\/vaccine-mandate-for-federal-employees-awaits-court-ruling\/","remove_feature_photo":false,"is_sponsored":false,"subtype":"","redirect_url":"","disable_inline_ads":false,"native_logo_pretext":"Presented By:"},"yoast_head":"\n