{"id":34224,"date":"2026-01-29T14:55:06","date_gmt":"2026-01-29T14:55:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/uncategorized\/2026\/01\/29\/america-can-strike-anywhere-but-can-it-stay-anywhere\/"},"modified":"2026-08-08T01:28:49","modified_gmt":"2026-08-08T01:28:49","slug":"america-can-strike-anywhere-but-can-it-stay-anywhere","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/opinions\/2026\/01\/29\/america-can-strike-anywhere-but-can-it-stay-anywhere\/","title":{"rendered":"America can strike anywhere \u2014 but can it stay anywhere?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The recent Operation Absolute Resolve captured Venezuelan President Maduro in a stunning display of American military power. Yet weeks later, pro-government forces still control Caracas, and the country remains \u201cuninvestable.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This gap between tactical brilliance and strategic stalemate reveals the central flaw in the Pentagon\u2019s new <a href=\"https:\/\/www.militarytimes.com\/news\/pentagon-congress\/2026\/01\/26\/trumps-new-national-defense-strategy-downgrades-china-threat\/\" target=\"_self\" rel=\"\" title=\"https:\/\/www.militarytimes.com\/news\/pentagon-congress\/2026\/01\/26\/trumps-new-national-defense-strategy-downgrades-china-threat\/\">National Defense Strategy<\/a>: America can project overwhelming force anywhere on Earth, but increasingly lacks the sustained presence to turn military victories into enduring outcomes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Jan. 24 National Defense Strategy, or NDS for short, confronts a hard reality: the United States cannot simultaneously deter China in the Taiwan Strait, defend the Panama Canal, guarantee European security, and extend nuclear deterrence over South Korea with current force levels.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Pentagon\u2019s answer is to prioritize homeland defense and Western Hemisphere dominance while maintaining First Island Chain denial and providing \u201ccritical but more limited\u201d support to Europe and Korea.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The problem isn\u2019t the diagnosis \u2014 it\u2019s that the cure may be worse than the disease.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">When priorities collide with physics<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The math simply doesn\u2019t work. Taiwan contingency planning alone would consume most available naval and air defense forces before accounting for Western Hemisphere or European commitments. Western Hemisphere defense requires separate force packages: airlift, amphibious platforms, intelligence systems, special operations units, and surface combatants. Current force levels were designed for sustained global commitments, not for simultaneous hemispheric dominance and Indo-Pacific denial while maintaining credible deterrence elsewhere.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Venezuela operation proves this constraint. America demonstrated it can strike anywhere, but the strategic outcome remains unresolved precisely because the new strategy deprioritizes sustained commitments outside priority theaters.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">But the force structure gap is only half the problem. The transition period while allies build capacity creates its own dangers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The transition window problem<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The strategy assumes NATO and South Korea can take \u201cprimary responsibility\u201d for regional defense within acceptable timeframes. But Europe faces daunting barriers: aggregate debt at 90% of GDP limits defense spending increases, limited indigenous production of precision munitions and advanced air defense creates capability gaps, and untested casualty tolerance raises questions about political sustainability. This creates a 3-5-year vulnerability window. Europe cannot operate independently while U.S. support is reduced.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">South Korea\u2019s challenge is even more acute. The claim that Seoul can take \u201cprimary responsibility for deterring North Korea\u201d with \u201ccritical but more limited U.S. support\u201d assumes conventional superiority can replace a nuclear guarantee. It cannot. North Korea\u2019s growing arsenal creates advantages in any escalation scenario that conventional forces cannot counter. \u201cCritical but more limited\u201d support undermines confidence in the fundamental question: Would Washington trade Los Angeles for Seoul? This ambiguity could prompt Seoul to reconsider its nuclear stance, triggering exactly the proliferation cascade nonproliferation policy seeks to prevent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">When strategy becomes personal<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Perhaps most troubling, the NDS ties its framework explicitly to \u201cPresident Trump\u2019s vision,\u201d mentioning him 47 times across 24 pages. Enduring strategies frame objectives around persistent national interests, not individual leadership. Containment \u2014 articulated in George Kennan\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/nsarchive2.gwu.edu\/coldwar\/documents\/episode-1\/kennan.htm\" target=\"_self\" rel=\"\" title=\"https:\/\/nsarchive2.gwu.edu\/coldwar\/documents\/episode-1\/kennan.htm\">\u201cLong Telegram\u201d<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/irp.fas.org\/offdocs\/nsc-hst\/nsc-68.htm\" target=\"_self\" rel=\"\" title=\"https:\/\/irp.fas.org\/offdocs\/nsc-hst\/nsc-68.htm\">NSC-68<\/a>, two pivotal documents of the early Cold War era \u2014survived nearly 50 years across nine administrations because it addressed Soviet threats to American interests.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">When strategy becomes synonymous with a single leader, it becomes vulnerable to reversal. If allies and adversaries believe this framework expires in 2029 or 2033, they adjust behavior accordingly: allies delay defense investments awaiting policy reversals; adversaries simply wait us out.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The adversary gets a vote<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The strategy\u2019s viability depends on adversaries accommodating American repositioning rather than exploiting vulnerabilities during the transition. History offers little comfort. Britain\u2019s 1937 Imperial Defence White Paper articulated clear priorities, but this didn\u2019t prevent Germany from exploiting the transition period before Allied rearmament.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">By designating certain theaters as lower priorities during allied capacity-building, the NDS creates a 3-5-year window for adversaries to test resolve.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The 2026 NDS offers overdue strategic clarity in diagnosing resource constraints. But it fails to show how America bridges the gap between current commitments and future capabilities without creating exploitable vulnerabilities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Venezuela operation crystallizes the dilemma: overwhelming tactical capability without strategic staying power. Until the Pentagon shows how it protects allies during the transition \u2014 or candidly acknowledges the risks they must accept \u2014 this strategy raises more questions than it answers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Strategy documents set intentions; adversary responses determine outcomes. On current evidence, significant gaps remain.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><i>Richard Berry is a national security strategist who served as senior advisor to six U.S. Indo-Pacific Command and U.S. Special Operations Command (2010-2025).<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Perhaps most troubling, the National Defense Strategy ties its framework explicitly to \u201cPresident Trump\u2019s vision,\u201d mentioning him 47 times across 24 pages.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":120275,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-noindex":"","_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-nofollow":"","_yoast_wpseo_canonical":"","_acf":"","_yoast_wpseo_primary_category":26,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","_smg_distribution_targets":[]},"categories":[26],"tags":[],"coauthors":[3678],"class_list":["post-34224","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-opinions"],"acf":{"subheadline":"","legacy_arc_id":"YNXF3PQJVVFLLCHOCQQCJCR7NM","arc_canonical_url":"\/opinion\/2026\/01\/29\/america-can-strike-anywhere-but-can-it-stay-anywhere\/","remove_feature_photo":false,"is_sponsored":false,"subtype":"","redirect_url":"","disable_inline_ads":false,"native_logo_pretext":"Presented By:"},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v26.0 (Yoast SEO v28.1) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>America can strike anywhere \u2014 but can it stay anywhere? - Federal Times<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Perhaps most troubling, the National Defense Strategy ties its framework explicitly to \u201cPresident Trump\u2019s vision,\u201d mentioning him 47 times across 24 pages.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"America can strike anywhere \u2014 but can it stay anywhere?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Perhaps most troubling, the National Defense Strategy ties its framework explicitly to \u201cPresident Trump\u2019s vision,\u201d mentioning him 47 times across 24 pages.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/opinions\/2026\/01\/29\/america-can-strike-anywhere-but-can-it-stay-anywhere\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Federal Times\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-01-29T14:55:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-08-08T01:28:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Richard Berry\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Richard Berry\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\n\t    \"@context\": \"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\n\t    \"@graph\": [\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"Article\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/federaltimes\\\/opinions\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/29\\\/america-can-strike-anywhere-but-can-it-stay-anywhere\\\/#article\",\n\t            \"isPartOf\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/federaltimes\\\/opinions\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/29\\\/america-can-strike-anywhere-but-can-it-stay-anywhere\\\/\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"author\": {\n\t                \"name\": \"migration\",\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/federaltimes\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"headline\": \"America can strike anywhere \u2014 but can it stay anywhere?\",\n\t            \"datePublished\": \"2026-01-29T14:55:06+00:00\",\n\t            \"dateModified\": \"2026-08-08T01:28:49+00:00\",\n\t            \"mainEntityOfPage\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/federaltimes\\\/opinions\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/29\\\/america-can-strike-anywhere-but-can-it-stay-anywhere\\\/\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"wordCount\": 743,\n\t            \"commentCount\": 0,\n\t            \"publisher\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/federaltimes\\\/#organization\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/federaltimes\\\/opinions\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/29\\\/america-can-strike-anywhere-but-can-it-stay-anywhere\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"thumbnailUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/GettyImages-2252580387.jpg.jpg\",\n\t            \"articleSection\": [\n\t                \"Opinion\"\n\t            ],\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t            \"potentialAction\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"CommentAction\",\n\t                    \"name\": \"Comment\",\n\t                    \"target\": [\n\t                        \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/federaltimes\\\/opinions\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/29\\\/america-can-strike-anywhere-but-can-it-stay-anywhere\\\/#respond\"\n\t                    ]\n\t                }\n\t            ]\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"WebPage\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/federaltimes\\\/opinions\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/29\\\/america-can-strike-anywhere-but-can-it-stay-anywhere\\\/\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/federaltimes\\\/opinions\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/29\\\/america-can-strike-anywhere-but-can-it-stay-anywhere\\\/\",\n\t            \"name\": \"America can strike anywhere \u2014 but can it stay anywhere? - Federal Times\",\n\t            \"isPartOf\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/federaltimes\\\/#website\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"primaryImageOfPage\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/federaltimes\\\/opinions\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/29\\\/america-can-strike-anywhere-but-can-it-stay-anywhere\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/federaltimes\\\/opinions\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/29\\\/america-can-strike-anywhere-but-can-it-stay-anywhere\\\/#primaryimage\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"thumbnailUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/GettyImages-2252580387.jpg.jpg\",\n\t            \"datePublished\": \"2026-01-29T14:55:06+00:00\",\n\t            \"dateModified\": \"2026-08-08T01:28:49+00:00\",\n\t            \"description\": \"Perhaps most troubling, the National Defense Strategy ties its framework explicitly to \u201cPresident Trump\u2019s vision,\u201d mentioning him 47 times across 24 pages.\",\n\t            \"breadcrumb\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/federaltimes\\\/opinions\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/29\\\/america-can-strike-anywhere-but-can-it-stay-anywhere\\\/#breadcrumb\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t            \"potentialAction\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ReadAction\",\n\t                    \"target\": [\n\t                        \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/federaltimes\\\/opinions\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/29\\\/america-can-strike-anywhere-but-can-it-stay-anywhere\\\/\"\n\t                    ]\n\t                }\n\t            ]\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/federaltimes\\\/opinions\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/29\\\/america-can-strike-anywhere-but-can-it-stay-anywhere\\\/#primaryimage\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/GettyImages-2252580387.jpg.jpg\",\n\t            \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/GettyImages-2252580387.jpg.jpg\"\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"BreadcrumbList\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/federaltimes\\\/opinions\\\/2026\\\/01\\\/29\\\/america-can-strike-anywhere-but-can-it-stay-anywhere\\\/#breadcrumb\",\n\t            \"itemListElement\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 1,\n\t                    \"name\": \"Home\",\n\t                    \"item\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/federaltimes\\\/\",\n\t                    \"ad_zone\": \"home\"\n\t                },\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 2,\n\t                    \"name\": \"Opinion\",\n\t                    \"item\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/federaltimes\\\/opinions\\\/\",\n\t                    \"ad_zone\": \"opinions\"\n\t                },\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"ListItem\",\n\t                    \"position\": 3,\n\t                    \"name\": \"America can strike anywhere \u2014 but can it stay anywhere?\"\n\t                }\n\t            ]\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"WebSite\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/federaltimes\\\/#website\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/federaltimes\\\/\",\n\t            \"name\": \"Federal Times\",\n\t            \"description\": \"Federal Times\",\n\t            \"publisher\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/federaltimes\\\/#organization\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"potentialAction\": [\n\t                {\n\t                    \"@type\": \"SearchAction\",\n\t                    \"target\": {\n\t                        \"@type\": \"EntryPoint\",\n\t                        \"urlTemplate\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/federaltimes\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"\n\t                    },\n\t                    \"query-input\": {\n\t                        \"@type\": \"PropertyValueSpecification\",\n\t                        \"valueRequired\": true,\n\t                        \"valueName\": \"search_term_string\"\n\t                    }\n\t                }\n\t            ],\n\t            \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\"\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/federaltimes\\\/#organization\",\n\t            \"name\": \"Federal Times\",\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/federaltimes\\\/\",\n\t            \"logo\": {\n\t                \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t                \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/federaltimes\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\n\t                \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/federal-logo-white.png\",\n\t                \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/06\\\/federal-logo-white.png\",\n\t                \"caption\": \"Federal Times\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/federaltimes\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"\n\t            }\n\t        },\n\t        {\n\t            \"@type\": \"Person\",\n\t            \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/federaltimes\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1\",\n\t            \"name\": \"migration\",\n\t            \"image\": {\n\t                \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n\t                \"inLanguage\": \"en-US\",\n\t                \"@id\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=gcf4cb6ee0ec29e49e7a963234e4340ec\",\n\t                \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\n\t                \"contentUrl\": \"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\n\t                \"caption\": \"migration\"\n\t            },\n\t            \"url\": \"https:\\\/\\\/one.sightlinemg.com\\\/federaltimes\\\/author\\\/migration\\\/\"\n\t        }\n\t    ]\n\t}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"America can strike anywhere \u2014 but can it stay anywhere? - Federal Times","description":"Perhaps most troubling, the National Defense Strategy ties its framework explicitly to \u201cPresident Trump\u2019s vision,\u201d mentioning him 47 times across 24 pages.","robots":{"index":"noindex","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"America can strike anywhere \u2014 but can it stay anywhere?","og_description":"Perhaps most troubling, the National Defense Strategy ties its framework explicitly to \u201cPresident Trump\u2019s vision,\u201d mentioning him 47 times across 24 pages.","og_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/opinions\/2026\/01\/29\/america-can-strike-anywhere-but-can-it-stay-anywhere\/","og_site_name":"Federal Times","article_published_time":"2026-01-29T14:55:06+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-08-08T01:28:49+00:00","author":"Richard Berry","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Richard Berry","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/opinions\/2026\/01\/29\/america-can-strike-anywhere-but-can-it-stay-anywhere\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/opinions\/2026\/01\/29\/america-can-strike-anywhere-but-can-it-stay-anywhere\/"},"author":{"name":"migration","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/#\/schema\/person\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1"},"headline":"America can strike anywhere \u2014 but can it stay anywhere?","datePublished":"2026-01-29T14:55:06+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-08T01:28:49+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/opinions\/2026\/01\/29\/america-can-strike-anywhere-but-can-it-stay-anywhere\/"},"wordCount":743,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/opinions\/2026\/01\/29\/america-can-strike-anywhere-but-can-it-stay-anywhere\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/GettyImages-2252580387.jpg.jpg","articleSection":["Opinion"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/opinions\/2026\/01\/29\/america-can-strike-anywhere-but-can-it-stay-anywhere\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/opinions\/2026\/01\/29\/america-can-strike-anywhere-but-can-it-stay-anywhere\/","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/opinions\/2026\/01\/29\/america-can-strike-anywhere-but-can-it-stay-anywhere\/","name":"America can strike anywhere \u2014 but can it stay anywhere? - Federal Times","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/opinions\/2026\/01\/29\/america-can-strike-anywhere-but-can-it-stay-anywhere\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/opinions\/2026\/01\/29\/america-can-strike-anywhere-but-can-it-stay-anywhere\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/GettyImages-2252580387.jpg.jpg","datePublished":"2026-01-29T14:55:06+00:00","dateModified":"2026-08-08T01:28:49+00:00","description":"Perhaps most troubling, the National Defense Strategy ties its framework explicitly to \u201cPresident Trump\u2019s vision,\u201d mentioning him 47 times across 24 pages.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/opinions\/2026\/01\/29\/america-can-strike-anywhere-but-can-it-stay-anywhere\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/opinions\/2026\/01\/29\/america-can-strike-anywhere-but-can-it-stay-anywhere\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/opinions\/2026\/01\/29\/america-can-strike-anywhere-but-can-it-stay-anywhere\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/GettyImages-2252580387.jpg.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/GettyImages-2252580387.jpg.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/opinions\/2026\/01\/29\/america-can-strike-anywhere-but-can-it-stay-anywhere\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/","ad_zone":"home"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Opinion","item":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/opinions\/","ad_zone":"opinions"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"America can strike anywhere \u2014 but can it stay anywhere?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/#website","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/","name":"Federal Times","description":"Federal Times","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/#organization","name":"Federal Times","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/federal-logo-white.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/federal-logo-white.png","caption":"Federal Times"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/#\/schema\/person\/cc76c831bb37a926738c8391fca7a3b1","name":"migration","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=gcf4cb6ee0ec29e49e7a963234e4340ec","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9e8d47be443ce94ce7fc357677b5f9c70235bb1f59e7267a102a74af58c04f59?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"migration"},"url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/author\/migration\/"}]}},"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"distributor_meta":false,"distributor_terms":false,"distributor_media":false,"distributor_original_site_name":"Federal Times","distributor_original_site_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes","push-errors":false,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/GettyImages-2252580387.jpg.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34224","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=34224"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34224\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":34225,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34224\/revisions\/34225"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=34224"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=34224"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=34224"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/federaltimes\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=34224"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}