He said it could be because of the ongoing drawdowns in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as the continuing effects of sequestration that are hitting DoD spending harder.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
“It is extraordinary, and very surprising,” Gordon said<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Contract spending will probably stabilize further in fiscal 2015, Gordon said, without any large drops or increases. But as Congress works to increase funding for the Defense Department, that spending might end up increasing in fiscal 2016, he said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
“I would expect that the numbers \u2014 if they drop at all \u2014 won’t drop as much as last year. You might even see a turnaround in DoD contract spending that leads to an overall increase in contract spending,” Gordon said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Michael O’Hanlon, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and a former national security analyst at the Congressional Budget Office, said fiscal 2014 spending numbers are down primarily because of the decrease in war costs and the continuing downward pressure of sequestration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
O’Hanlon said he believes there is a chance of higher numbers if Congress approves an increase in the overall DoD budget.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Rob Burton, former deputy administrator of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy at OMB and a government contracts attorney at Venable, said the drop in spending was not just related to sequestration but to an administration effort to reduce contract spending as a policy goal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n He said OMB has pushed agencies to rely less on contracted services and personnel, which he called “flawed reasoning.” In many agencies, federal personnel are short on experience or short on the critical skills the agency needs, Burton said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n “I think that is somewhat shortsighted \u2014 the government’s reliance on the private sector is probably more critical now than it has before,” Burton said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n While the Defense Department is seeing sharp drops now it will more than likely begin seeing increases in the next few years, Burton said. Congressional pressure to increase the Defense budget will force an increase in contract spending, he said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Army saw a 13 percent drop in spending, from $87.4 billion in fiscal <\/span>2013 to $75.8 billion. <\/span> The Army might see a smaller drop in spending in fiscal 2015 than it did in previous years \u2014 $5 billion or less \u2014 Harry Hallock, deputy assistant secretary for procurement at the Army, told Federal Times March 16.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Hallock said while fiscal 2015 might see some leveling off, Army contract spending has been falling every year since fiscal 2012. But the real concern within the Army is the automatic budget caps passed by Congress known as sequestration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n “What we are really worried about of course with sequestration is 2016, when it will fall off the cliff,” Hallock said. He would not speculate on how much of a drop that would entail for the Army.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Top contractors see drop in agency spending<\/b> The drop in government contract spending \u2014 especially within the Defense Department \u2014 also translates to a 12 percent drop in spending going to the top 10 contractors. Contract spending for the top 10 fell from $125.6 billion in fiscal 2013 to 110.3 billion in fiscal 2014.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Lockheed Martin took the biggest hit, with the total spending falling from $44 billion in fiscal 2013 to $32 billion in 2014 \u2014 a 27 percent drop. Boeing saw its share of spending fall as well, from 21.5 billion in 2013 to 19.4 in 2014.<\/p>\n\n\n\n General Dynamics Corporation saw a $1.8 billion increase, from $12.6 billion in 2013 to $14.4 billion in 2014.<\/p>\n\n\n\n McKesson Corporation, which provides pharmaceuticals and medical supplies, saw its share of spending increase from $4.7 billion in fiscal 2013 to $6.2 billion in 2014, raising it to the fifth biggest contractor by agency spending.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Aircraft manufacturing and engineer services take hit in fiscal 2014<\/b><\/p>\n\n\n\n Aircraft manufacturing took a big hit in fiscal 2014, with spending falling $15.3 billion to $30.9 billion. Engineering services also dropped from $29.2 billion to $26.9 billion in fiscal 2014.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Federal contract spending fell another $17 billion \u2013 or 3.7 percent \u2013 in 2014 and down 17 percent since 2011.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-noindex":"","_yoast_wpseo_meta-robots-nofollow":"","_yoast_wpseo_canonical":"","_acf":"","_yoast_wpseo_primary_category":15,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","_smg_distribution_targets":[]},"categories":[77,15,6,28],"tags":[],"coauthors":[2671],"class_list":["post-9365","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-acquisition-smr","category-management","category-acquisition","category-smr"],"acf":{"subheadline":"","legacy_arc_id":"MQ2W4KK7INCC7CUPLFINSLKPDI","arc_canonical_url":"\/management\/2015\/03\/25\/defense-department-spending-drops-24-billion-in-2014\/","remove_feature_photo":false,"is_sponsored":false,"subtype":"","redirect_url":"","disable_inline_ads":false,"native_logo_pretext":"Presented By:"},"yoast_head":"\n![\"\"](\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/counter-drone.jpg.jpg\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n
The decrease was primarily the result of the drawdown, which reduced requirements resulting in fewer contracts and contractor personnel to support the mission, according to the Army.<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n![\"\"](\"\/Portals\/_default\/Skins\/PrestoLegacy\/CommonCss\/images\/embed.jpg\" "\\"Top")
![\"\"](\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/636060087109816304-2770180jpg.jpg\")