As we reflect on the anniversary of this tragic event, a question to consider is: How has this event impacted those individuals who are too young to remember a world before 9\/11?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
As an applied social psychologist, I study<\/a> responses to natural and human-caused adversities that impact large segments of the population \u2013 also called \u201ccollective trauma.\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n My research group at the University of California, Irvine (UCI) has found that such exposures have compounding effects over the course of one\u2019s lifespan.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This is particularly relevant for children who have grown up in a post-9\/11 society.<\/p>\n\n\n\n PTSD and Ground Zero<\/b><\/i><\/p>\n\n\n\n Many of the outcomes on which my team and I focus involve mental health, such as post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTS) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).<\/p>\n\n\n\n Post-traumatic stress symptoms<\/a> include feeling the event is happening again (e.g., flashbacks, nightmares), avoiding situations that remind individuals of the event (e.g., public places, movies about an event), negative feelings and beliefs (e.g., the world is dangerous) or feeling \u201ckeyed up\u201d (e.g., difficulty sleeping or concentrating).<\/p>\n\n\n\n In order to meet diagnostic criteria for PTSD, an individual must have been directly exposed to a \u201ctraumatic event\u201d<\/a> (e.g., assault, violence, accidental injury). Direct exposure means that an individual (or their loved one) was at or very near the site of the event. It might be somewhat obvious that people directly exposed to a collective trauma like 9\/11 might suffer from associated physical and mental health problems. What is less obvious is how people geographically distant from the epicenter or \u201cGround Zero\u201d might have been impacted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This is particularly relevant when considering the impact of 9\/11 on children and youth across America: Many reside far from the location of the actual attacks and were too young to have experienced or seen the attacks as they occurred. The point is people can experience collective trauma<\/a> solely through the media and report symptoms that resemble those typically associated<\/a> with direct trauma exposure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Impact on physical and mental health<\/b><\/i><\/p>\n\n\n\n The events of 9\/11 ushered in a new era of media coverage of collective trauma, where terrorism and other forms of large-scale violence are transmitted into the daily lives of children and Americans families.<\/p>\n\n\n\n I have been exploring these issues with my collaborators Roxane Cohen Silver<\/a> and E. Alison Holman<\/a>. My colleagues surveyed a nationally representative sample of over 3,400 Americans shortly after 9\/11 and then followed them for three years after the attacks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In the weeks and months following the 9\/11 attacks, media-based exposure was associated with psychological distress<\/a>. This included acute stress<\/a> (which is similar to PTS but must be experienced in the first month of exposure), post-traumatic stress and ongoing fears and worries about future acts of terrorism (in the months following the attacks).<\/p>\n\n\n\n These harmful effects persisted in the years following 9\/11. For example, the team found measurable impact<\/a> on the mental and physical health (such as increased risk of heart diseases) of the sample three years after the attacks. Importantly, those who responded with distress in the immediate aftermath were more likely to report subsequent problems as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n These findings bear close resemblance to research led by psychologist William Schlenger<\/a>, whose team found that Americans who reported watching more hours of 9\/11 television in the immediate aftermath of 9\/11 were more likely to report symptoms resembling PTSD. For example, those who reported watching four to seven hours were almost four times as likely to report such symptoms compared to those who watched less<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n These findings were echoed in work conducted by Michael W. Otto<\/a>, who also found that more hours of 9\/11-related television watching was associated with higher post-traumatic stress symptoms<\/a> in children under 10 in the first year following the attacks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 9\/11\u2019s impact on children<\/b><\/i><\/p>\n\n\n\n However, it is also the case that studies have found the number of children who reported longer-term distress symptoms to be relatively low. Among other factors, children whose parents had low coping abilities or themselves had learning disabilities tended to report higher distress.<\/p>\n\n\n\n For example, my collaborator Virginia Gil-Rivas<\/a>, who studied American adolescents<\/a> exposed to 9\/11 only through the media, found that symptoms of post-traumatic distress decreased in most adolescents at the one-year mark. An important finding of her study was how parental coping abilities and parental availability to discuss the attacks made a difference.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Furthermore, children who had prior mental health problems or learning disabilities tended to be at higher risk for distress symptoms<\/a>. That could be because children prone to anxiety in general experienced increased feelings of vulnerability<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Despite the number of studies<\/a> that have followed children over the course of several years, no studies have comprehensively examined the long-term impact of 9\/11 on children\u2019s development and adjustment. That is because it is difficult to compare American children who lived through 9\/11 with those who did not, since almost every American child was exposed to images of 9\/11 at some point in time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This limits the ability of researchers to examine how children\u2019s lives might have changed over time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n However, some researchers believe that even media-based exposure to collective trauma could likely have a longer-term impact on the attitudes and beliefs<\/a> of those who grew up in a post-9\/11 world. It is possible, for example, that exposure to 9\/11 and other acts of terrorism has led to fears of perceived threats<\/a>, political intolerance, prejudice and xenophobia in some American children.<\/p>\n\n\n\n How 9\/11 trauma impacts people today<\/b><\/i><\/p>\n\n\n\n Years later, a bigger question is: How does the collective trauma of 9\/11 affect people today?<\/p>\n\n\n\n Over the past several years, my team and I have sought to address many of the issues that remained unanswered in the scientific literature after 9\/11. We sought to replicate and extend the findings initially produced after 9\/11 through an examination of responses to the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing, the worst act of terrorism in America since 9\/11.<\/p>\n\n\n\n To this end, we surveyed 4,675 Americans<\/a>. Our sample was demographically representative, meaning that our sample proportionally matched the U.S. Census data on key indicators such as ethnicity, income, gender and marital status.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This allowed us to make stronger inferences about how \u201cAmericans\u201d responded. Within the first two to four weeks of the Boston Marathon bombings, we surveyed our sample about their direct and media-based exposure to the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing and their subsequent psychological responses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Our study found that as media exposure (a sum of daily hours of Boston Marathon bombing-related television, radio, print, online news and social media coverage) increased, so did respondents\u2019 acute stress symptoms<\/a>. This was even after statistically accounting for other variables typically associated with distress responses (such as mental health).<\/p>\n\n\n\n People who reported more than three hours of media exposure had higher probability of reporting high acute stress symptoms than were people who were directly exposed to the bombing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Then, last year, we sought to explore<\/a> whether the accumulation of exposure to events like 9\/11 and other collective trauma might influence responses to subsequent events like the Boston Marathon bombing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Once again, we used data from demographically representative samples of people who lived in the New York and Boston metropolitan areas. We assessed people who lived in the New York and Boston areas to facilitate a stronger comparison of direct and media-based exposure to 9\/11 and the Boston Marathon bombing: people who lived in New York or Boston were more likely to meet criteria for \u201ctrauma exposure.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n This study had two primary, congruent findings. First, people who experienced greater numbers of direct exposure to prior collective trauma (e.g., 9\/11, the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting<\/a>, Superstorm Sandy<\/a>) reported higher acute stress symptoms after the Boston Marathon bombings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Second, greater amounts of media-based live exposure (i.e., people watched or listened to the event as it occurred on live television, radio, or online streaming) to prior collective trauma were also associated with higher acute stress symptoms after the Boston Marathon bombing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n So greater direct and media-based exposure to prior collective trauma was linked with greater acute stress responses (e.g., anxiety, nightmares, trouble concentrating) after a subsequent event.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Stay informed, but limit exposure<\/b><\/i><\/p>\n\n\n\n Overall, our research indicates that the impact on children growing up post-9\/11 likely extends well beyond the physical and mental health effects of exposure \u2013 be it direct or media-based. Each tragic incident that individuals witness, even if only through the media, likely has a cumulative effect.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Nevertheless, the positive finding is that most people are resilient<\/a> in the face of tragedy. In the early years following 9\/11, several studies examined how 9\/11 impacted children nationally<\/a>. Like adults, children exposed both directly and through the media tended to be resilient in the early years following the attacks and symptoms generally decreased over time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Even so, being aware of the potential for distress through media exposure is important. Even small percentages can have large implications for our nation\u2019s physical and mental health. For example, in the case of 9\/11, 10 percent of a nationally-representative sample reporting post-traumatic stress<\/a> represents 32,443,375 Americans<\/a> with similar symptoms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n So, people should stay informed, but limit repeated exposure to disturbing images, which can elicit<\/a> post-traumatic stress and lead to negative psychological and physical health outcomes.<\/p>\n\n\n\t![\"\"](\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/SEPTA.jpg.jpg\")
![\"\"](\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/SEPTB.jpg.jpg\")
![\"\"](\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/SEPTE.jpg.jpg\")
![\"\"](\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/SEPTF.jpg.jpg\")
![\"\"](\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/SEPTG.jpg.jpg\")