{"id":18721,"date":"2020-03-06T20:21:17","date_gmt":"2020-03-06T20:21:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/navytimes\/uncategorized\/2020\/03\/06\/explainer-why-it-took-40-years-to-pass-a-bill-acknowledging-the-armenian-genocide\/"},"modified":"2026-08-08T18:58:52","modified_gmt":"2026-08-08T18:58:52","slug":"explainer-why-it-took-40-years-to-pass-a-bill-acknowledging-the-armenian-genocide","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/one.sightlinemg.com\/navytimes\/news\/your-navy\/2020\/03\/06\/explainer-why-it-took-40-years-to-pass-a-bill-acknowledging-the-armenian-genocide\/","title":{"rendered":"Explainer: Why it took 40 years to pass a bill acknowledging the Armenian genocide"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Between 1914 and 1921, the Ottoman Empire carried out an extended campaign to expel or kill the Armenians<\/a> living in Turkey and its border regions. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

From massacres to death marches, 1.5 million of Turkey\u2019s historic Armenian population was murdered.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Since 1923, Turkey<\/a> has denied perpetrating what came to be called the Armenian genocide. It has pressured its allies to refrain from officially declaring the events a \u201cgenocide,\u201d which the United Nations defines<\/a> as acts committed with the \u201cintent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But in a milestone vote in late 2019, both the U.S. House<\/a> and Senate<\/a> defied that pressure and the weight of over 40 years of precedent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They passed a bill declaring that the killing of 1.5 million Armenians by the Ottoman Turks was, in fact, a genocide.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Since 1975, numerous efforts<\/a> were made<\/a> to pass an Armenian genocide bill. The decades-long struggle involving Turkey, Israel, Armenian-Americans, the American Jewish community and the U.S. government over the commemoration of the Armenian genocide resulted in failure to pass a bill every time \u2013 until 2019.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Remnant of Armenian family, a glass negative from Bain News Service, between ca. 1915 and ca. 1920. (Library of Congress)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Setting the table<\/b><\/i><\/p>\n\n\n\n

I am a historian of international relations<\/a>. I am currently writing a book that focuses on Israeli-Turkish-American relations<\/a> and the contested memories of the Armenian genocide<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The political struggle over U.S. recognition of the Armenian genocide was set in motion during the presidency of Jimmy Carter in 1976. Carter came to the job with a commitment to protecting human rights<\/a>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

That commitment was soon tested by the longstanding strategic relationship between the U.S. and Iran, which was ruled by the Shah with an iron fist. By late 1977, U.S.-Iranian relations were deteriorating<\/a> after Carter sent mixed signals about the Shah\u2019s dictatorship and his abuse of Iranians\u2019 human rights.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In 1978, Carter\u2019s fraught relations with the Shah weakened the Iranian leader\u2019s hold on power. Popular protest movements mounted, culminating in the Shah\u2019s overthrow in 1979, the Iranian fundamentalist revolution<\/a> and the American hostage crisis<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The criticism at home about the Carter-Shah relationship and American Jews\u2019 reluctance to support Carter\u2019s administration<\/a> convinced the president and his staff members to re-promote human rights through American foreign policy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Their strategy: Use the Holocaust as a universal lesson for genocide prevention to help reinforce ties with Jewish voters.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
President Jimmy Carter and Shah of Iran inspect the troops during a 1977 welcoming ceremony for the Shah. (National Archives)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Holocaust remembrance<\/b><\/i><\/p>\n\n\n\n

While the Iran crisis was playing out, on Nov. 1, 1978, Carter launched the President\u2019s Commission on the Holocaust. Carter requested that the commission submit a report addressing the<\/a> \u201cestablishment and maintenance of an appropriate memorial to those who perished in the Holocaust.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The commission included American Holocaust survivors like Elie Wiesel<\/a> and Benjamin Meed<\/a>. The commission\u2019s September 1979 report recommended special days of remembrance for the Jewish victims of the Holocaust, a dedicated education program, and the establishment of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum<\/a> as a national memorial.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The museum, the report said<\/a>, should be focused on one specific aspect of the Nazis\u2019 many crimes: the \u201cunique\u201d and unprecedented nature of the murder of the Jews \u2013 even over other Nazi victims.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cMillions of innocent civilians were tragically killed by the Nazis. They must be remembered. However, there exists a moral imperative for special emphasis on the six million Jews. While not all victims were Jews, all Jews were victims, disdained for annihilation solely because they were born Jewish,\u201d wrote the commission.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This approach clashed with Carter\u2019s views on the universal lessons of the Holocaust.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It also aroused the opposition of representatives of other victims of the Nazis, such as the Roma<\/a> and the gay community<\/a>, who pressed for inclusion in the Holocaust museum.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
President Ronald Reagan and Nancy Reagan on the campaign trail with George Deukmejian and Pete Wilson in Fountain Valley California, Sept. 3, 1984. (National Archives)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

A \u2018campaign to remember\u2019<\/b><\/i><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Another heated debate was taking place about who should pay for the museum, which was estimated to cost $100 million.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The land allocated on the National Mall in Washington, D.C., was a contribution by the federal government. But the remaining funds to build the museum were to be donated mainly by the American public through a \u201cCampaign to Remember<\/a>.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This was the moment \u2013 the convergence of Carter\u2019s vision of human rights protection and the \u201cCampaign to Remember\u201d \u2013 that the organized American-Armenian community believed could bring the almost-forgotten memory of the Armenian genocide back to public consciousness.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

California Gov. George Deukmejian<\/a>, an Armenian-American, pressured museum leaders to appoint Set Momjian as its American-Armenian community representative. The Armenian community in the U.S. made a donation of $1 million<\/a>, aiming to be able to include the Armenian genocide in the museum\u2019s focus.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In August 1983, the Armenian expectations became reality when the museum commission reached a decision to include the Armenian genocide in the exhibition narrative. Although the decision about the 1915 genocide was informal, it was still a commitment that later would be difficult to reverse.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Armenian refugees in Palestine, October 1918 (American Red Cross, now in the Library of Congress)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Turkey looks to Israel<\/b><\/i><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Turkish government was extremely anxious about the museum. It turned for help to its regional and Cold War ally, Israel. Turkey pressured Israel to influence the concept of the museum and to make sure the Armenians were left out of the memorial.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As part of an oral history project<\/a>, I interviewed Gabi Levy, who served as Israeli ambassador to Turkey from 2007 to 2011<\/a>. Levy told me that throughout the history of Israeli-Turkish relations, whenever Turkey had an urgent concern in the U.S., \u201cthe Turks carried assumptions regarding the \u2018magical power\u2019 of Israel\u2019s foreign policy,\u201d especially their purported ability to use the American Jewish lobby for influence the U.S. political arena.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Israel capitalized on presumptions about the Israeli\/Jewish \u201cmagic power\u201d to convince Turkey that they were taking all \u201cpossible measures.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Israeli diplomats tried to persuade the relevant American players to prevent the Armenian experience from being incorporated into the museum, requesting influential Jewish congressmen such as Tom Lantos<\/a> and Stephen Solarz<\/a> to convince the museum commission to exclude the Armenian genocide. Lantos and Solarz believed this would serve U.S. interests in the Middle East that included Israel and Turkey maintaining good relations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ultimately, as a key U.S. NATO ally, it was Turkey\u2019s own pressure on the U.S. Congress and the Reagan administration\u2019s Cold War<\/a> fears that forestalled any presence of the Armenian genocide in the museum as well as resulted in the failure to pass the Armenian genocide bill.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When the memorial finally opened its doors in 1991, its focus was the Holocaust and Jewish victims.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
President William J. Clinton lighting the flame in Washington D.C. at the Holocaust Memorial Museum Dedication. Elie Wiesel is pictured at the right. (Sharon Farmer, now in the Library of Congress)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

What changed in 2019?<\/b><\/i><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Internationally, a number of developments supported the dramatic changes in U.S.-Turkish relations in 2019. They include Turkey\u2019s July purchase of a Russian-made<\/a> air defense system, which angered the Americans, and the October military offensive by Turkey in Northern Syria against the Kurds, who were U.S. allies<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the U.S., the unprecedented condemnation by both Democrats and Republicans of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdo\u011fan for his attack on Kurds in Syria, as well as the impeachment process<\/a> against Erdogan ally Donald Trump, weakened Congress\u2019 adherence to the longtime official position favoring<\/a> Turkey.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Congress passed powerful sanctions<\/a> against Turkey. The Armenian genocide bill<\/a> was part of the package.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Importantly, the bill passed by the U.S. Congress states<\/a> the U.S. will \u201ccommemorate the Armenian Genocide through official recognition and remembrance.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The U.S. is thus committed to allocate federal resources to build a U.S. memorial to commemorate the 1915 genocide \u2013 just as with the the 1978 President\u2019s Commission on the Holocaust.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Practically speaking, building a U.S. Armenian genocide museum or memorial will have further negative implications for U.S.-Turkish relations, which might take another 40 years to rebuild.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Armenians with the flag they used to signal for help after their resistance on Musa Dagh, Turkey, during the Armenian Genocide. Photograph probably taken after their arrival at Port Said, Egypt, September 1915. (Bain News Service photograph now in the Library of Congress)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Dr. <\/i>Eldad Ben Aharon<\/i><\/a> is a lecturer at the Leiden University Institute for Area Studies. He specializes in the field of modern Middle East studies and the region\u2019s diplomatic history during the Cold War. His research focuses on Israel\u2019s foreign policy from 1948 to the present and Memory Studies, Holocaust and Genocide Studies, Arab Jews and the theory and practice of Oral History. <\/i><\/p>\n\n\n\t