F-35 Partners Have Six Months To Decide on FY17 Block Buy

By

Lara Seligman

Maj. Gen. Jay Silveria, U. S. Air Force Warfare Center commander, steers his F-35A Lightning II along the yellow taxi line prior to a hot pit refueling session during his final flight qualification Sept. 26 at Eglin Air Force Base, Fla. Silveria became the first general officer in the Department of Defense to qualify in the fifth generation fighter. He completed his training with back-to-back flights and hot pit refueling. (U.S. Air Force photo/Samuel King Jr.)

ORLANDO, Fla. — Lockheed Martin can still support a bulk F-35 buy among international partners in fiscal year 2017, but time is running out for the jJoint pProgram oOffice to make a final decision.  

If the F-35 international partners want to participate in a “block buy” beginning in FY17, Lockheed needs to know within the next six months in order to prepare the supply chain, company F-35 program manager Jeff Babione told reporters Feb. 25.

“It takes about two years to order the parts for any given lot — you really need about two, two and a half years to make sure the supply chain is ready for that,” Babione said during the Air Force Association’s air warfare symposium in Orlando, Florida. “For a 2018 buy we probably have time, for 2017 we probably need to do that in the next six months.”

If the international partners move forward with a block buy in FY17, the US will not participate, JPO chief Lt. Gen. Chris Bogdan told reporters Feb. 10. However, the US could choose to opt in to such a deal in later years, he said.

The Pentagon’s latest budget request reflects a decision to include advanced funding in FY18 for a block buy to start in FY19, Bogdan said. The deal would cover FY19 through FY21 and is expected to save over $2 billion in total, he stressed.

Babione also touted the advantages of participating in a block buy, but said Lockheed would prefer a longer time frame.

“We should be able to save multi-billion dollars — if you are going to buy those airplanes anyway, we can save you a couple billion dollars,” he said. “Is there a scenario where we could start the partner multiyear ahead of the US? That’s possible, but it probably wouldn’t be our preference.”

Email: lseligman@defensenews.com

Twitter: @laraseligman